I decided to see what I could find on the matter for your country. I chose the NSW region since I understand that to be the most populated one (I can easily be wrong here). This is what I found.
NSW Department of Education and Training:
*…]Children and young people’s attitudes towards other people and level of acceptance of diversity are developed by observing and copying the behaviours they see, particularly of the adults around them. Therefore negative attitudes towards same-sex attracted people, which may be presented from the earliest age, can impact on the views of children. Primary schooling is a critical phase in developing positive and non-discriminatory views relating to same-sex attracted people in our society…]
In the past, education programs have virtually ignored talking about same-sex attracted people or presented images which have been negative or stereotypical. Some people report the absence of any positive references or images of same-sex attracted people in their entire schooling. Current educational programs in NSW seek to address this shortcoming and government schools are encouraged to address homophobia and same-sex attracted issues through PDHPE programs and whole-school welfare programs. While secondary schools have more opportunities for explicit teaching of same-sex attracted issues through their sexuality programs with adolescents, primary schools are a critical factor in challenging attitudes early in life and promoting a more accepting and diverse society. Sexuality education also provides an appropriate context for addressing discrimination and sexual harassment issues which are an increasing problem in our society…] *
Thank you. I think you found the right one, I’m from NSW.
You can tell whoever set this up certainly has an agenda.
They say “
Being inclusive of same-sex attracted people and managing homophobia.”
That would be good if it wasn’t for the agenda in doing so, which presents the sexual acts of homosexuality as a moral and normal varient of sexuality.
My worry is the word “homophopia” because we all know how the LGBT agenda likes to throw that word around, in other words, “homophobic” is now anyone who doesn’t accept the sexual acts of homosexuality (such lifestyle) as a moral and embraced varient of sexuality.
This was one of their points to emphasise - *In primary schools, there are opportunities when teaching sexuality, to be inclusive of same-sex attracted people and issues by:
- using inclusive language when discussing social and emotional changes during adolescence to acknowledge that some students may be attracted to the same sex, e.g. using the term partners instead of boyfriend and girlfriend or husband and wife.*
I ask myself, what on earth people are thinking? This is the first step I believe to destroying the family.
Like Ravi said, I wouldn’t mess with the foundations of good thinking, especially when it comes to the Christian understanding of marriage and family, because I believe the family is the corner stone to society, as the family erodes, so will society.
And as G.K. Chesterton said -
“Don’t ever take a fence down until you know the reason it was put up.” - G.K. Chesterton
This is such a shame
mainly because of the sexual immorality it’s going to indoctrine the next generation with and because before anyone else can get to them and educate them on sexuality and sexual immorality, the first thing every young child will be taught, will be to embrace their sexuality without regard for whether it is right or wrong, without regard for sexual morality, because secular society wants to tell people that anything they sexually desire is perfectly ‘okay’ to act on.
Sorry for the rant. It’s just that this is going to harm so many young kids in such disasterous ways, their only saving grace will be if these kids have another role model in their life (such as parents if their plugged in) to teach them correctly (on sexual morality).
I believe It’s kind of like how Hitler indoctrined the next generation with prejudice toward the Jews, they will indoctrine the next generation with sexual immorality and indirectly with prejudice toward those who teach sexual morality such as the Church.
I will simply remind myself of this quote -
*“Give me the patience to endure that which cannot be changed, the courage to change that which should be changed, and the wisdom to know the difference.” *- Oliver J. Hart
God Bless
Thank you for reading
Josh
)
eople that were not of the same racial classification before such marriages were allowed) there were people that engaged in sex and commitment without marriage. I’ve also had coworkers or other associates that were committed to a significant other for years to over a decade without getting a civil marriage. There are people that engage in marriage and sex without commitment to each other. And there have been people that have married and are committed to each other without interacting sexually.