The RCC facade

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timmy_Z
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
you are right, the popes should bring back the inquisition, try these dissenters for heresy, and erect stakes and start burning people again.
I’m working on it, although I tend to shy away from recommending executions anymore. Too much paperwork.

Humor aside, the Church has been in the middle of an Inquisition of sorts for many years now. People don’t recognize it because it doesn’t get as much bad press as the Spanish Inquisition. One of the things rooted out by this modern Inquisition is the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), the founder of which (Bishop Marcel Lefebvre) and his group were excommunicated by Pope John Paul II, as was the American pro-choice lobby Catholics for a Free Choice.
 
It would be torture to run to assist a vomiting child and step on something like that in the middle of the night! :rotfl:

To the OP: Anytime you encounter a Catholic who says something that sounds wrong, or deviant from what you know about Catholicism, you should just ask them point blank if that’s their personal opinion or the official teaching of the Church. šŸ‘
 
The centralised body of the RCC is either unwilling or unable to rain in catholics who flagrantly reject core RCC doctrine.

Considder how many catholics openly reject central church teaching on Christian essentials. How many gay rights rallies have practicing priests paticipating? There are organizations of practicing catholics for ordaining women. The majority of catholics use contraception or openly approve it in full unity with Rome. How many Catholics are members of Amnesty international, NOW, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, or other pro-Abortion groups? How many RC politicians continue to ensure the legality of abortion? None of these people are ever rained in or removed by the supposed authority of the RCC.
Of course, there are those in the Church who do not keep all its doctrines. We are all sinners after all. Show me a perfect Protestant, would you please? What about the Protestant minister who steadfastly preaches against sexual immorality but later gets publicly caught up in the scandal of adultery? (As a teen I watched as one’s ordination was pulled because he not only committed adultery, but he did so with a congregation member’s teenage daughter.) The Church is filled with people, and people, even when they know and accept the truth, make mistakes and committ sins. That is why we have the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

What is unified in the Catholic Church is the core doctrine. However, there is a lot that is not specified in that doctrine as well. The Church gives her people a relatively wide latitude in persuing their personal spirituality and relationship with God. In fact, there are two major traditions within the Church now which are both in keeping with core Doctrine and fall under the authority of the Pope. They are known as the Roman or Latin Rite and the Eastern Rite. Traditions of practice vary quite a lot between the two. There are also adjustments to the Mass rubrics to take into account the fact that in some cultures, the same gesture may have different meanings as well. These are all handled by the national conferences of Bishops and approved by the Pope before being put into practice. For example, in the United States we kneel during the consecration, but in another culture, perhaps standing is the most appropriate way to express the same humility and respect for this crucial moment in the liturgy.

There are many orders of religious that have different means of seeking the same goals and have different callings and charisms. There are a variety of lay apostolates such as Opus Sanctorem Angelorum, The Legion of Mary, the Apostolate of Holy Motherhood, and the now wildly famous Opus Dei. There are mystics and contemplatives, and then there are charasmatic Catholics–both celebrate the same gifts of the Holy Spirit in sometimes drastically different fashion. Yet both of these spiritualities are valid and, though different in personal practice, comply with Catholic Doctrine. That is part of the Catholic Church’s true universality.

This does not excuse those Catholics who blantantly defy the teaching authority of the Church. Though, they are no less Catholics, they are in grave spiritual danger. Instead of blaming the Church for the failings of some of its members, let us pray for those members who are failing that God will strengthen them in their faith, in their trust, and in their understanding of the teaching authority of the Church, and that the Holy Spirit will guide them back home.
 
Real quick as I am late for work…
The point is that the factual authority that establishes Catholic doctrine is a reality that n-Cs can not even attempt to lay any realistic claim to…and the fact that your entire argument is based not upon faithful Catholics but those who dissent and reject the valid teachings of the faith.
Protestants do not pretend to be a unified visible church, RC’s do. We all acknowledge there are dissenters is every church. The RC’s claim unity while there is dissent that is not excommunicated within (and we can all think of very public names as an example).

Why are those who ā€œdissent and reject the valid teachings of the churchā€ allowed to remain in a visible, ā€œunifiedā€ church??
Can you point to any such authority and unity of doctrine among your own community?
In my local church? Yes we practice church discipline (excommunication)
Prots in general? No we don’t claim it
There really is no merit to this argument that you seek to advance and again…all I see is a comparison of the worst of Catholics to some mythological best of n-Cs, probably for no other purpose than to attempt to create a dichotomy that actually does not exist.
Michael, you keep bringing up this N-C to RC best/worst comparison and it makes no sense to me as I do not understand how it pertains to the discussion.
We are discussing the RCC claim of church unity (leave prots out of it, as we don’t claim it). The RCC makes the claim of unity (within its visible church). That unity is false (does not exist).

Thanks for all the replies everyone,
Tim
 
We are discussing the RCC claim of church unity (leave prots out of it, as we don’t claim it). The RCC makes the claim of unity (within its visible church). That unity is false (does not exist).

Thanks for all the replies everyone,
Tim
The problem is that you are confusing the ā€œunityā€ of the Roman Catholic Church with the perfection of its members in keeping its doctrines and creed. The Church does not claim all its members to be perfect. We never have. We claim unity of doctrine and creed. This we do have. That individuals have difficulty in keeping to this doctrine and creed to varying degrees is not disunity of doctrine–it’s called individual sin.
 
The Church is unified in belief and doctrine. Of course it isn’t a dictatorship so you can’t expect that there is a definite statement about everything. However the essential things you mention are clearly stated. There are however people who reject these things. This is however not an argument against the Church. Why?

Because people who for example ordain women go agaist the Church. By going agaist the Church they thus do not represent it’s teaching. People who knowingly fall into these heresies in fact place themselves outside of the Church.
 
Yes Timmy Z and Atemi, you are both so correct…
So how do you suppose we get all those Catholic folks who split from the the Catholic Church starting back in the 1500’s back in the fold? Boy has that been a scandal or what. And what about that Catholic Monk changing doctrine and teaching heresy? Now we have all these folks starting different faith communities and changing doctrine and core Christian/Catholic beliefs left and right. We really need to do something about that for sure. So what do you both think we should do?
That’s the rub with Atemi—our heretics are his liberators.
 
What is the RCC? :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
Its an acronym that stands for Roman Catholic Church, which USUALLY stands for the Catholic Church in toto, whereas most Catholics understand Roman Catholicism to mean adherents to the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church (which is only ONE of the 26 or so liturgical rites in the Church).
 
40.png
Scott_Lafrance:
I’m working on it, although I tend to shy away from recommending executions anymore. Too much paperwork.
Does that mean I can come out of the fridge now? :angel1:
 
Its an acronym that stands for Roman Catholic Church, which USUALLY stands for the Catholic Church in toto, whereas most Catholics understand Roman Catholicism to mean adherents to the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church (which is only ONE of the 26 or so liturgical rites in the Church).
So why don’t folks just say ā€˜Catholic Church’? After all I don’t use Ac for Anglican churches as Ac could mean a kind of electrical current. I don’t use Pc for Pentecostal churchs as Pc could mean politically correct. I don’t use Mc for Methodist churches as Mc could mean master of ceremonies. Bc could mean Before Christ instead of Baptist churches. And so on.

I agree with Jimmy Akin’s 2noorulz and suggest that RCC be stricken from acceptability too. I certainly don’t answer to it. One thing about whistling at the dog, if the dog don’t recognize the whistle, the dog aint’ a-gonna be a comin any time soon. 😃
 
If B16 excommunicated every dissenter/heretic, there would be a flood of posts, ā€œWhy is the RCC so intolerant?ā€. The Times headline would read, ā€œReturn of the Inquisition?ā€

😦
 
you are right, the popes should bring back the inquisition, try these dissenters for heresy, and erect stakes and start burning people again.
Oh now I’m really torn. What should I do? Collect firewood for the heretics or flip hamburgers for the Tiber-swimmers beach barbecue? Can someone help me?

🤷
 
If B16 excommunicated every dissenter/heretic, there would be a flood of posts, ā€œWhy is the RCC so intolerant?ā€. The Times headline would read, ā€œReturn of the Inquisition?ā€

😦
If that happened there woulndt be 1 billion catholics anymore. I would imagine the number would drop drastically.:eek:
 
Timmy Z:
My experience is that going from denom to denom is nearly the equivalent of going parrish to parrish.
This of course is no more than anecdotal but in any case please set out your anecdotal evidence. What exactly has your experience been of going from parish to parish?

😃
Timmy Z:
Church disipline or excommunication is a practise that is commanded in the Bible and allowed in RC doctrine. I ask a question on why it is not used in the RCC
It is.
Timmy Z:
and doctinal diversity is allowed or sanctioned within RC ā€œunionā€.
It isn’t.
Timmy Z:
It is then insinuated that I am asking for torture and brutal murder. Grow Up. :mad:
Is misrepresenting Church teaching grown up? :confused:
 
If that happened there woulndt be 1 billion catholics anymore. I would imagine the number would drop drastically.:eek:
The Pope has said that the Church will get smaller. It’s early in his papacy yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top