The real face of Jesus

  • Thread starter Thread starter eo_chibears
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

eo_chibears

Guest
Is it racist that many people view Jesus Christ as a white man? No one knows what he actually looked like, so why is he generally portrayed as a white guy? This topic was brought up in a Bible study class that I attend. Any thoughts from you out there?
 
Is it racist that many people view Jesus Christ as a white man? No one knows what he actually looked like, so why is he generally portrayed as a white guy? This topic was brought up in a Bible study class that I attend. Any thoughts from you out there?
My friend and I always thought of Jesus as a Hebrew Arab looking guy.
We never really saw him as white,
 
Yeah based on where he lived I seriously doubt he looked like a Caucasian European.
😃 yes, but remember Christianity was mainly dominant in Europe.
So most painting of him were white, but yes he probably looked a lot like what we picture him as today. Except he isn’t white. 👍

God Bless
 
If you want to know what Jesus looked like, just look at the Shroud of Turin. The negative of the shroud is as close as you will get to what Our Lord looked like. I know the Church does not recognize whether or not the Shroud is genuine, but, there exists a face cloth, supposedly the one used to wipe Christ’s face by St. Veronica when he was on His way to Cavalry. The facial image is exactly like the one on the Shroud of Turin.
 
If you want to know what Jesus looked like, just look at the Shroud of Turin. The negative of the shroud is as close as you will get to what Our Lord looked like. I know the Church does not recognize whether or not the Shroud is genuine, but, there exists a face cloth, supposedly the one used to wipe Christ’s face by St. Veronica when he was on His way to Cavalry. The facial image is exactly like the one on the Shroud of Turin.
Thanks for the information, I looked at it, very interesting. God bless
 
I have seen pictures of Jesus being black. Honestly if he was purple i dont see why people care. His colour is of no significance. Just artistic choice.
 
He of course would have Arabic/Middle Eastern colored skin, as He lived in that area for all his life, coming from a family who lived there all their life. Ethnically, He is Middle Eastern/Jewish.

However, artists portray Him as they see fit, mainly because (in my opinion) it reaches out to the audience more. For example, I’m white – and I’ll be more affected by a painting of a White Jesus than a painting of an Asian Jesus. And an Asian may have the exact opposite opinion: to them, an Asian-looking Jesus may be more connecting.

It’s no big deal, really…

Here’s a picture of an Asian (Chinese) Jesus:
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/ChineseJesus.jpg

Here’s a picture of a Black (Ethiopian) Jesus:
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Iyesus_%28Ethiopia%29.jpg

Here’s a picture of a White Jesus:
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Christ_Carrying_the_Cross_1580.jpg/438px-Christ_Carrying_the_Cross_1580.jpg

In my opinion, the last one speaks to me the most, but that’s probably because I’m White, and it reaches out to me more. That being said, I ***can *** connect to, say, a “brown-skinned” Jesus that would look more historically accurate.
 
The portrayal of Christ has always followed the traditions of the royalty of the area. The portrayal of Christ as a bearded man with long hair I think came from the Byzantine era where that was the style of the rich and powerful at the time. The white portrayal probably came from the fact that Christ wasn’t black and that European artists mainly portrayed him causing him to once again appear as the people of the area. We really have nothing to base Christ’s appearance from so we have taken the appearance of the nobility which eventually became common practice and has simply stuck.
 
Is it racist that many people view Jesus Christ as a white man?
Not to be a language nut, but I think you are misusing the term “racist” in your question. The definition of racism is “Prejudice or discrimination directed against someone of a different race based on such a belief.” So how is viewing Jesus as white discrimination? Who is being discriminated? What group is being singled out?

This is all more rhetorical than anything else. It just bothers me how EVERYTHING people do is somehow racist according to modern society. Granted, it is mostly politicians and talking heads in the media, but I don’t like how that word is thrown around to explain any situation.
 
Not to be a language nut, but I think you are misusing the term “racist” in your question. The definition of racism is “Prejudice or discrimination directed against someone of a different race based on such a belief.” So how is viewing Jesus as white discrimination? Who is being discriminated? What group is being singled out?

This is all more rhetorical than anything else. It just bothers me how EVERYTHING people do is somehow racist according to modern society. Granted, it is mostly politicians and talking heads in the media, but I don’t like how that word is thrown around to explain any situation.
I am not missing the term. Assuming Jesus was white and not taking into account what he most likely looked like could be considered racist. Most people love the our Lord regardless of what he looks like. Unfortunately there are some out there who may not want to follow a middle eastern looking Jesus.
 
Is it racist that many people view Jesus Christ as a white man? No one knows what he actually looked like, so why is he generally portrayed as a white guy? This topic was brought up in a Bible study class that I attend. Any thoughts from you out there?
Is it racist that in many places he is portrayed as black, when looking at people of that region they are more olive skinned? No-one knows exactly what Christ looked like and it is unimportant. There is a stunning Polish icon in my cathedral of a black Virgin and Infant Jesus. There is a natural tendency to feel more of an affinity with people of your own race - hence why European tradition portrays Jesus as white, African icons show Him as black, In the Far East portraits show him as Asian. It doesn’t matter what the portrait looks like, what matters is that we understand that these images represent the Lord.


40.png
eo_chibears:
I am not missing the term. Assuming Jesus was white and not taking into account what he most likely looked like could be considered racist. Most people love the our Lord regardless of what he looks like. Unfortunately there are some out there who may not want to follow a middle eastern looking Jesus.
But why does what He looked like matter? We do not follow the Lord because of His appearance, whether we share His human ethnicity or not. That is not important. It’s tantamount to saying ‘Christ probably had brown eyes but this icon shows Him with blue eyes’. The ‘accuracy’ of the depiction really doesn’t matter. What matters is that we have love for and faith in Him and see the images as just what they are: images and representations, not actually the Lord Himself.
 
Is it racist that many people view Jesus Christ as a white man? No one knows what he actually looked like, so why is he generally portrayed as a white guy? This topic was brought up in a Bible study class that I attend. Any thoughts from you out there?
i have a joke for you that covers this issue. A white man and a black man are driving down a road the white man is trying to convince the black man that Jesus is white the black man is trying to convince the white man that Jesus is black. they are so busy arguing that they don’t see the big tree and crash into it. both are killed they go to heaven St Peter sees them and says wait here Jesus comes out and says Buenos días amigos?
 
Is it racist that in many places he is portrayed as black, when looking at people of that region they are more olive skinned? No-one knows exactly what Christ looked like and it is unimportant. There is a stunning Polish icon in my cathedral of a black Virgin and Infant Jesus. There is a natural tendency to feel more of an affinity with people of your own race - hence why European tradition portrays Jesus as white, African icons show Him as black, In the Far East portraits show him as Asian. It doesn’t matter what the portrait looks like, what matters is that we understand that these images represent the Lord.

http://www.portsmouthcatholiccathedral.org.uk/album/pictures/Black10Virgin10Poland450450.jpg

But why does what He looked like matter? We do not follow the Lord because of His appearance, whether we share His human ethnicity or not. That is not important. It’s tantamount to saying ‘Christ probably had brown eyes but this icon shows Him with blue eyes’. The ‘accuracy’ of the depiction really doesn’t matter. What matters is that we have love for and faith in Him and see the images as just what they are: images and representations, not actually the Lord Himself.
the Blessed Mother is black because the portrait of her was burned and tried to be destroyed by the turks when they invaded poland. now matter what they did to the picture they could not destroy it so finally they tried to burn it and that is why she is black.

She is our Lady of Czestochowa. if you ever get to the town you can go and visit the image.
 
I am not missing the term. Assuming Jesus was white and not taking into account what he most likely looked like could be considered racist. Most people love the our Lord regardless of what he looks like. Unfortunately there are some out there who may not want to follow a middle eastern looking Jesus.
Let’s go back a little into art history. It was around the late Middle Ages followed by the Renaissance that we started seeing realistic portrayals of Jesus. Now, the artists at the time basically drew inspiration and direction from the world around them. This is why many works of religious art depicting Jesus have people wearing Renaissance clothing which is totally historically inaccurate. This is also why Jesus looks very Western European. The European artists most likely had European models. Flash forward several centuries. The US’s cultural history is rooted in Western, Christian Europe. So what do we have as our prevailing model of Jesus? A white man.

Your original question was whether the general portrayal of Jesus as a white man is racist. And I say no. The artists who created the works that have formed our cultural, subconscious image of Jesus probably didn’t make him white out of a prejudice or malice towards Middle Easterners. And we can’t be considered racists if those works of art make up the majority of what a Westerner has been exposed to in their lives. In general, Western culture does not think of Jesus as white out of a malice for Middle Eastern looking people so the racist tag cannot be applied.
 
If you want to know what Jesus looked like, just look at the Shroud of Turin. The negative of the shroud is as close as you will get to what Our Lord looked like. I know the Church does not recognize whether or not the Shroud is genuine, but, there exists a face cloth, supposedly the one used to wipe Christ’s face by St. Veronica when he was on His way to Cavalry. The facial image is exactly like the one on the Shroud of Turin.
GS
I agree. A couple of weeks ago I saw the Rembrandt exhibition of “The Face of Jesus” in the Philadelphia Art Museum. In addition there were a couple of paintings by several lesser artists that depicted the image on the Veil of Veronica, the cloth that Veronica used to wipe the sweat from Jesus’ face on His way to Calvary. All of the images by the several lesser artists were similar and also wondrously similar to the image on the Shroud of Turin.

As for Rembrandt, his early faces are of a Dutch looking man. Then he began using a Jewish neighbor as a model and the faces were more Middle Eastern looking, but nothing like the image on the Shroud.

The experience has strengthened my belief in the authenticity of the Shroud.

Yppop
 
These are the the images of the man in the shroud created by Ray Downing by computer using the information encoded in the shroud itself, including 3D information embedded in the shroud and the most advanced 3D technology available. If the shroud is true (I believe it is) then these would represent the closest/most accurate pictures ever made of Jesus: Isn’t he beautiful?
 
These are the the images of the man in the shroud created by Ray Downing by computer using the information encoded in the shroud itself, including 3D information embedded in the shroud and the most advanced 3D technology available. If the shroud is true (I believe it is) then these would represent the closest/most accurate pictures ever made of Jesus: Isn’t he beautiful?
That’s really cool, thanks for sharing that. God bless
 
Jesus is Prophet of GOD and also known as Messiah. He sacrifice his life for the GOD and the humanity, His real face is like you and me, He is just a normal man like you and me, his face is white due to the peace which he is spreading all the time.

Thank You Cards
 
Is it racist that many people view Jesus Christ as a white man? No one knows what he actually looked like, so why is he generally portrayed as a white guy? This topic was brought up in a Bible study class that I attend. Any thoughts from you out there?
He was metamorphosed by artists into a white man to Christianize Europe. It is the same reason why we celebrate his birthday on December 25. Jesus real birthday is not December 25. It was used only to Christianize the pagans who celebrate winter festival or solstice.🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top