pablope;10901456 said:
Acts27
34 Wherefore I pray you to take some meat: for this is for your health: for there shall not an hair fall from the head of any of you.
No. As I had stated…only in the SDA interpretation does the Scripture conflict…not in the Catholic understanding and interpretation because we still carry the apostolic meaning.
The SDA interpretation centers on trying to disprove the CC. Aside from the Bible, there is the apostolic tradition, which is evident and continues to live in the common life, common teaching, common worship and liturgy of the Church.
This shows how the basis of your and sda interpretation:
Ecclesial Deism
calledtocommunion.com/2009/07/ecclesial-deism/
‘Tradition’ becomes whatever one agrees with in the history of the Church, such as the Nicene Creed or Chalcedonian Christology…What makes it ‘authoritative’ for Mohler is that it agrees with his interpretation of Scripture. If he encounters something in the tradition that seems extra-biblical or opposed to Scripture he rejects it. For that reason, tradition does not authoritatively guide his interpretation. His interpretation picks out what counts as tradition, and then this tradition informs his interpretation.
Substitute your name for Mohler. Your understanding and interpretation are based on the claims of EGW…not the Apostles.
So another question to you…what makes your understanding authoritative over that of the CC? Where did the SDA gets its authority?
The Catholic church doesn’t keep the fourth commandment? Do they?
What is the 4th commandment to you? And how do you think the CC does not keep it?
And are you the authority to say whether the CC keeps it or not?