The Red Pill: How radical feminism is demeaning to men

  • Thread starter Thread starter smichhertz
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of radical feminists are going to be lonely later in life. I hope that men’s rights folks, who have many good points that are dead on point, don’t make the same mistake the feminist made. I would even like to see radical feminists temper their views. If Laci Green (not the most radical of course) can do it, so can they.

I know that people in the **current **mainstream won’t necessarily have that problem, but there’s a lot of people who have swallowed the identitarian kool-aid and especially for women the clock is ticking.
Sure. Although they tell themselves that they don’t mind.
Most radical feminists I know are usually the ones who have a string of men lusting after them right now. Think of those stereotypical women with…a certain hairstyle, size, dressing, range of vocabulary, etc. The sane girls tend to be invisible to men. It’s odd. It won’t be the same once they hit a certain age, though.

I do notice these young men making the same mistakes. Their views on relationships and women are so off that I don’t know how a woman, who isn’t desperate to settle down, would want to commit to them. Thankfully (or not), their movement is not that influential (when compared to feminism, who actually changed the heck out of society) and the rest of the men don’t seem to pay any attention. But when radical feminism gets bigger, so does the men. Both fuel each other’s anger, it is kind of cute.

Do I want these radical feminists to calm down? Yes, because they are ruining society, but at the same time, we really don’t need more good women competing for good men :rolleyes:
 
This whole “pill” thing seems to be the domain of men who have severe personal and social issues and also have a bizare penchant to blame political forces for their personal failures.
Personality wise I bet many of them have a lot in common with conspiracy theorists. There is also a sense of entitlement to having a woman. In the past there would have been a lot of women married to men who didn’t deserve a wife because there were fewer options for women. I don’t think it’s a bad thing that feminism gave women more options but obviously these types of men see it differently.
 
I don’t think it’s a bad thing that feminism gave women more options but obviously these types of men see it differently.
Right. I’ve read Return of Kings pretty extensively, and it’s pretty clear that these schmucks regard women, even “good” women, as subhuman.
 
Right. I’ve read Return of Kings pretty extensively, and it’s pretty clear that these schmucks regard women, even “good” women, as subhuman.
They should move to China or India.

These countries are in the process of killing off their women.

Or move to a monastery.

However, I doubt the monastery would accept them.
 
Right. I’ve read Return of Kings pretty extensively, and it’s pretty clear that these schmucks regard women, even “good” women, as subhuman.
There is plenty of misandristic feminist writing out there too, yet I am not supposed to judge your movement by it.
They should move to China or India.

These countries are in the process of killing off their women.

Or move to a monastery.

However, I doubt the monastery would accept them.
I will do that when you move to Sweden. According to that alt-right organization the UN, it is going to be a 3rd World Country by 2030. They also have a much higher rape rate than the USA too.
 
There is plenty of misandristic feminist writing out there too, yet I am not supposed to judge your movement by it.I will do that when you move to Sweden. According to that alt-right organization the UN, it is going to be a 3rd World Country by 2030. They also have a much higher rape rate than the USA too.
What is this about moving to Sweden? Why do you want me to move to Sweden?

My post was not directed at you but was referring to men who view women as subhuman. If a woman viewed men as subhuman, I would tell her off too.

I am against any writing or views that dehumanizes anyone.
 
There is plenty of misandristic feminist writing out there too, yet I am not supposed to judge your movement by it.
You’re on record as saying women shouldn’t have the right to vote. I don’t need a “movement” to judge you by.
 
…There is also a sense of entitlement to having a woman…
Try reading some ROK. In between the articles discussing toxic femininity, you can find plenty of articles about fitness, style, having interesting hobbies and being a better conversationalist. How the heck is telling men to better themselves in order to be more attractive entitlement? That is the exact opposite. At any rate it sure beats the advice my father gave me about just being myself.
What is this “my movement”? I do not identify as a feminist but as a Catholic.

How did you glean from my post that I was telling you not to judge misandrist writing?

I am against any writing or views that dehumanizes anyone. If any woman says she looks at men as being subhuman, I would disagree with her too.
That comment was addressed to TheAmazingGrace, whose remark I quoted. You seem to be one of the more reasonable posters here.
 
Most women like most men have no business voting. I am not a believer in democracy.
 
Try reading some ROK. In between the articles discussing toxic femininity, you can find plenty of articles about fitness, style, having interesting hobbies and being a better conversationalist. How the heck is telling men to better themselves in order to be more attractive entitlement? That is the exact opposite. At any rate it sure beats the advice my father gave me about just being myself. That comment was addressed to TheAmazingGrace, whose remark I quoted. You seem to be one of the more reasonable posters here.
Oh okay.

I realized I misread your post.

I have revised my own post to remove that section.
 
No, I currently would not qualify under the conditions I would require for exercise of the franchise.
 
I do have to say, dealing with a certain class of men taught me some very unladylike manners. If someone’s being polite I will be polite back, but I’ve dealt with far too many men where “Oh **** off already” is the only thing that actually gets through. (Note: I’m counting not listening to politeness as rude behavior, as well as, obviously, crude or inappropriate advances.)
 
As Rorschach would say, “No compromise, even in the face of Armageddon.” Perhaps I should get some black and white calling cards. :cool:

If I am to be ruled, I want to be ruled by men worthy of my allegiance.
 
Good basic old fashioned advice. But it also needs to be understood that radical feminists and their identitarian allies have a very voice in academia in the West in the humanities and through such alliances a decent amount of influence in Hollywood and the media.

When your father says these women are your equal in intellect and wit, it also means they can be just as manipulative and sneaky as men.
 
Depends how you define red pill. Conservatives in the USA have been using that word before MRA’s jumped on it.

It just means that someone thinks for themselves. There’s people center-left who would insist until they are blue in the face they are redpilled.

Also, it’s not going to be a fad. With 3rd wave feminism deeply imbedded in universities along with this twisted post-modern social justice and its opponents aside from Jordan Peterson and a handful of MRAs and left-leaning atheists on social media directly opposing it, this battle is going to be around for a while and it’s not going away. It’s well funded with taxpayer money in nearly every Anglo Western nation and taxpayers are too interested in their own government benefits to care.

Just look at what Evergreen College. BTW gang, if you have to google that or any of the name I’ve mentioned in this thread, you’re wayyyyyyy behind on what’s going on and with current events…and no lazily watching the 10 PM News, the BBC or RTE or CBC will NOT give you these stories.

I would suggest that Catholics start paying attention and that includes parents and priests…While we still have time.
 
Honestly, I feel like at this point we’re rather confusing the issue with terms that none of us can agree on the meaning of.
 
Leaving your parents aside, do you concede that there are women that treat men deceitfully, contemptuously and exploitatively? If you do not concede that, then I must consider you as naive, or at least overidealistic, in that regard. In your view, are men required to be doormats?
 
Honestly, I feel like at this point we’re rather confusing the issue with terms that none of us can agree on the meaning of.
Like I said, people are talking over each other and not bothering to read or watch suggested links.

So this is really becoming a waste of time, which is unfortunate, because a lot of good points are being made.
 
There is plenty of misandristic feminist writing out there too, yet I am not supposed to judge your movement by it.I will do that when you move to Sweden. According to that alt-right organization the UN, it is going to be a 3rd World Country by 2030. They also have a much higher rape rate than the USA too.
Didn’t you say a while back that you’re a fan of Roosh V? If his writings aren’t representative of the Red Pill, then what is in your eyes?
 
As Rorschach would say, “No compromise, even in the face of Armageddon.” Perhaps I should get some black and white calling cards. :cool:

If I am to be ruled, I want to be ruled by men worthy of my allegiance.
Are you referring to a character? I’m thinking not Hermann Rorschach who used inkblots for psychoanalysis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top