D
DustinsDad
Guest
(continued from above…)
You seem to think that “there can be no bad unintended consequenses resulting from anything the Church allows in its approved disciplines”.
That’s all for now my friend, thanks for letting me rant a little bit…and Peace in Christ!
DustinsDad
Now, that would mean protection from officially teaching error as truth in regards to faith and morals. Even if you would apply this to discipline, it would mean that there is no explicit error taught as truth in the NO missal…towhich I would agree. To say that all disciplines perfectly and exactly lead the faithful, I would just have to disagree.Even discipline enjoys a negative infallibility.
You seem to think that “there can be no bad unintended consequenses resulting from anything the Church allows in its approved disciplines”.
Here’s a comparison of the two textsthat demonstrate what I’m trying say much better than I can myself. I’d also recommend Chapter V of **The Ottaviani Intervention. **And loooooong before I was Episcopalian, I was Baptist…Congregationalist/Ana-Baptist/Calvinist worship bears NO resemblance to the Catholic Mass, the TLM or the NO. So you have to be talking about the Lutherans if you’re excluding the Anglicans and my point remains: common antecedents.
That’s all for now my friend, thanks for letting me rant a little bit…and Peace in Christ!
DustinsDad