The Retreat of Courage

  • Thread starter Thread starter ricmat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

ricmat

Guest
1 of 2

Where has the courage gone?

In Genesis 1, after creating inanimate forms of matter, God created lower forms of life and then created man and woman. He gave them the Garden of Eden, and told them to become one flesh (person), and to go forth and multiply. The nature of women’s bodies reveals her role in God’s plan - to be a fountain of new life, and to nurture that new life. Adam’s role was to protect (keep) the Garden, and make it fruitful. So Adam’s role was to protect, and provide for his spouse - the fountain of life, his children, and the Garden in general.

With original sin, Adam failed to protect anything when the serpent appeared. So what should have happened?

Christ said “This is my body, which is given up for you.” In other words, Christ, as the new Adam, gives us this example of what must sometimes be done. Man must sometimes sacrifice his own life in order to protect spouse and immediate family, and more generally others in the Garden.

I made this statement in an adult catechism class - “Man must be willing to provide for his spouse and family, and protect them even to the point of sacrificing his own life.” The class was overwhelmingly female, and I half expected some progressive thinking women to walk out in a huff while shouting “hey, we don’t need no stinkin help from men to protect ourselves…” Actually, no women walked out, 2 out of 3 men did, and none of the 3 came back for any more sessions. What the heck???

And a month ago we had the high school shooting episode where a single crazy person with a gun walked at will through the school killing people, and stopped only when his gun jammed. This was apparently a very large school (5000?) so you had probably a thousand or more prime age men on site, none of whom were willing to distract, divert, or attempt to disarm the assailant either alone or in a group. If the gun hadn’t jammed, everybody in the school could have been killed. Meanwhile, the highly trained police force waited outside for the shooting to stop before going in.

Ditto the Pulse nightclub shootings. A club with hundreds of prime age men, a single shooter, and nobody willing to take any sort of action except hiding in the bathrooms.

Even after Adam’s mishap, men retain some degree of the desire to protect. Witness all those unfortunate young boys helped by the Last Wish Foundation. What do they want? They want to be Batman. They want to be Superman. They want to be Fire Chief, or Police Chief. They want to save others. God bless them.

2 of 2 below
 
2 of 2

In 2001 watching the 9/11 event happen in real time, I watched, stunned, and in awe as hundreds of emergency responders (mostly men) rushed into the 2nd twin tower to save people, even though the 1st tower had just collapsed and the 2nd was most probably going to do the same thing at any time. My thought at the time was “didn’t they just see the first tower collapse??” To no one’s surprise, tower 2 did collapse, and the responders were killed. Why would they rush in given the circumstances? Because it’s what they do. They offer their lives to protect others. Why would Jesus accept torture and the cross for us? It’s called love. It’s the ultimate expression of love. God bless them.

On that same 9/11 day, a bunch of men on a hijacked airplane rushed the hijackers in an attempt to first, take back control of the plane, or lacking that, to prevent it from being flown into another large building. At least they succeeded with the 2nd. God bless them too.

How is it that 7 year olds know that they should save others, and by the time you are in high school, or an adult, you know that the answer is to hide in the bathroom and hope the bad guy goes away, or hope that his gun jams, or hope that he runs out of ammunition. Perhaps they’re waiting for Wonder Woman to come to the rescue.

O Courage, where are you?

[my rant is now over]
 
Guns are not omnipotent weapons. Not having one does not make a person defenseless. That’s no doubt the narrative that gun control advocates want you to believe. But it’s not true.

Guns can’t shoot in all directions at the same time. If 2 people came at the attacker from opposite directions, he could be knocked down, and a bunch of people jump on him…

Or you’ve got 30 students and a teacher in the classroom…everybody start throwing books, backpacks, or whatever. Distract the bad guy and rush him…

What would you do if the weapon wasn’t a gun? A baseball bat, for example. Or a knife? Or a box cutter (those were popular at one time).
 
The chances of untrained people coordinating an attack against someone armed is highly unlikely. It’s very easy for YOU to come up with solutions after the fact. We depend on trained law enforcement personnel to provide protection, not your average citizen. You’re being unrealistic.
 
Parkland students depended on trained law enforcement for protection and 17 died. And many more would have died except the gun jammed.

Pulse nightclub patrons depended on trained law enforcement for protection, and over 50 died.

Average citizens can do a lot. What is lacking is courage to do ANYTHING.

Would an untrained, uncoordinated attack by amateurs have turned out any worse? Would having a single armed teacher (or guard) in the building have made anything worse?

Trained law enforcement had enough information to put this guy behind bars before anything happened, and they didn’t.

If you were being beaten to death on the street, and dozens of people are walking by, would you prefer that they try to help you, or wait for trained law enforcement to arrive???
 
Last edited:
Sounds like you’re blaming the victims… “You could’ve, should’ve, and I would’ve” 😐
 
The Lord did not give us a spirit of fear. Although I’m surrounded by refugees, immigrants and drug addicts, I still feel no need to own a firearm. My wife feels the same way.

Gun culture plays it’s own part in the culture of death, and as a Christian/Catholic I want nothing to do with it.
 
As Catholic Christians we have a responsibility to protect our spouse, children, families in general, and the public at large. The government is not the answer (as can be seen in the examples above).

Guns are not inherently evil. They can be used for good purposes as well as bad. If you don’t trust yourself to use it for good purposes, then I definitely agree that you should have nothing to do with one.
 
Courage comes in many forms, which means it does not always mean acting like Rambo.
Read up a bit more on these cases and you will discover cases of teachers and husbands using their bodies as shields and etc. That is courage too.
Just a question if I may, and it is have you ever been shot at or had your life threatened?
 
Yes, I’m partially blaming the victims. For lack of courage.

Courage is a positive virtue, and it seems that our society is trying to eliminate it, so I’m really blaming those in our society who try so hard to banish courage.

One of the reasons I started this thread was to remind people that there is such a thing, and that we need to encourage it rather than quiver in fear when reality strikes.
 
I agree with everything you said. Did I mention Rambo anywhere? I don’t think so.

Yes, teachers and husbands, bodies as shields. Yes. Yes. And if you can knock the bad guy off balance, even better.
 
Well, then I’m gonna be courageous and open carry my Smith and Wesson M&P .45
 
You can do that of course. It might save somebody’s life some day (I’m assuming you’re a good guy!)

You may be misunderstanding me, however. I’m not equating courage with carrying a gun. I’m equating courage with sacrificing your own body, even to the point of death if necessary, to save someone else. I think I said that in the first or second post.
 
You didn’t have to mention Rambo, but you promoting that attitude.
This thread is going no where so may God be with you.
 
I re-read my posts, and what I was promoting throwing books and backpacks at the assailant. I don’t recall Rambo ever doing that. Which movie was that??
 
This Thread has much,

-Bravado

“A bold manner or a show of boldness intended to impress or intimidate.”

The OP has much,

-Machismo

“Strong or aggressive masculine pride.”

An unarmed citizen charging a gunman could be considered,

-Foolhardy

“Recklessly bold or rash.”
 
Last edited:
From the Catholic Dictionary

COURAGE

Definition

Virtue of bravery in facing difficulties, especially in overcoming the fear of consequences in doing good. As moral courage, it enables a person to pursue a course deemed right, through which one may incur contempt, disapproval, or opprobrium. As physical courage, it is simply bodily or emotional strength to withstand opposition. It differs from fortitude in being more aggressive in undertaking, whereas fortitude is more patient in undergoing what is virtuous but hard.
and…
What is fortitude?
Fortitude is the virtue of courage in the face of danger and toughness in the face of pain. It is one of the cardinal virtues. It is necessary for us in both our natural and supernatural lives.
 
Cruciferi, is it foolhardy or rash to run into a burning building to try to save people (like my example in the second post of this thread). Many would say yes. Do you?

Do you think that courage has any role in our society?
 
Or you’ve got 30 students and a teacher in the classroom…everybody start throwing books, backpacks, or whatever. Distract the bad guy and rush him…
Yea, the record seems to indicate that’s not how it plays out. There is plenty of individual courage displayed by victims, but not much group coordination. Most schools don’t allow backpacks in the class btw, they belong in the locker.

I’d much prefer to rely upon a hit to the central nervous system, or center of mass,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top