I agree. It is disingenuous to give a conclusion as if it is supported by a chart. I think in fact the source of this data from 2003 gave the opposite conclusion,True, but the intent, it seems to me, is to imply causation. “If only we did these ‘reasonable steps’,…”
First Reports Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Violence: Firearms Laws
Evidence was insufficient to determine the effectiveness of any of these laws for the following reasons. … However, NICS lacks much of the required background information, particularly on certain restriction categories. … However, denial of an application does not always stop applicants from acquiring firearms through other means. Overall, evaluations of the effects of acquisition restrictions on violent outcomes have produced inconsistent findings: some studies indicated decreases in violence associated with restrictions, and others indicated increases.
Thank goodness for the NRA.These discussions have become comically absurd. “Lawdy, lawdy! They gonna take my guns away!” Ridiculous. 8 years of extreme left-wing leadership, and nope, I still have all my guns. Relax! Find something else to save the world from. This dead horse has been sufficiently beaten.
I think the point of the OP was that what is illegal in California about one firearm and not the other does not impact its power, which, by the way, is not “high powered” ordinance, but 9mmThis is not rocket science. It is not impossible. The argument from the first post is an NRA line that no one that is not already in favor of legalized, high-power ordinance will be fooled by.
Malarkey. It’s been a long, bitter and CONTINUED fight.These discussions have become comically absurd. “Lawdy, lawdy! They gonna take my guns away!” Ridiculous. 8 years of extreme left-wing leadership, and nope, I still have all my guns. Relax! Find something else to save the world from. This dead horse has been sufficiently beaten.
You still have yours, but what about the next generation, and the one after that?These discussions have become comically absurd. “Lawdy, lawdy! They gonna take my guns away!” Ridiculous. 8 years of extreme left-wing leadership, and nope, I still have all my guns. Relax! Find something else to save the world from. This dead horse has been sufficiently beaten.
Nope. It’s just a very graphic/simple example.The first post has a basic flaw.
I’m talking about gun control. There are not “good” gun control laws.A bad law does not mean no law is good.
“Assault rifles” have effectively been banned since 1934. It’s laughable how the gun-haters keep trying to sell the lie that modern sporing rifles are “assault rifles.” It’s that sort of disingenity that makes ALL of their comments suspect.We can ban assault rifles.
It is indeed impossible to pass ANY gun control law that will reduce gun-related violent crime. It’s been proven not to work, time and time again.This is not rocket science. It is not impossible.
Oh! The dreaded NRA “boogieman” comment! It always shows up when there is nothing left!The argument from the first post is an NRA line that no one that is not already in favor of legalized, high-power ordinance will be fooled by.
And from “like CA” to like Nazi Germany.I see the entire USA going like CA when it comes to gun control.
Once should never make comments simply to “stir” things.withdrawn. No need to stir this any longer.
Just think, the government has even more powerful weapons that are secret…Yes, you bet gun control is ridiculous. Hell, I’d own a A-10 Thunderbolt ll GAU-8/A Avenger 30 mm. Gatling-gun
Uh-huh. You do realize that progressives own the education system from kindergarten through college…right? Just look at the inroads they’ve made on gender and LGBT issues alone. And as said, this liberal agenda is being taught to 5 and 6 year olds. By the time these kids graduate, unless parents deprogram their children of this radicalism, they will have far left socialism so well ingrained in them, that most of them wouldn’t give a rat’s patoot about the 2nd amendment! The liberal education system in this country, which I perceive to be largely over looked in this battle, is a huge chunk of the playing field for the future of American gun rights. Right now, if this were a chess match, I would say that liberals are very, very, close to “check mate.”These discussions have become comically absurd. “Lawdy, lawdy! They gonna take my guns away!” Ridiculous. 8 years of extreme left-wing leadership, and nope, I still have all my guns. Relax! Find something else to save the world from. This dead horse has been sufficiently beaten.
That is a matter of opinion, which is kind of the point. Your arguments only preach to the choir and will only persuade those who do not believe in any gun control, or a limited gun control. The Catholic bishops in the United States have repeatedly spoken up for the need of some control, that elevates public safety over the right to own any and every gun one wants. It is a pro-life issue for them.I’m talking about gun control. There are not “good” gun control laws.
Ah, the dreaded scare quotes. I said I won’t waste time with that stupid argument. It is a pro-gun red herring that no one believes works except those who are pro-gun. Yet, as someone who would like to see America a safer place, I think threads like this will move us forward. The rather terrible defense of our proliferation of firearms and death is so hypocritical, the lesser threat of Muslim terrorist has sending us into extreme measures when it comes to travel.“Assault rifles” have effectively been banned since 1934.
Engaging a little intelligence, I would like to point out that this was my first post and the NRA is always part of the discussion when it comes to gun control.Oh! The dreaded NRA “boogieman” comment! It always shows up when there is nothing left!
Somalia has no rule of law. There’s plenty of gun control. Those in power control the guns.Somalia has no gun control.
That’s not true. A gun control law has to be EFFICACIOUS for it to be a GOOD gun control law. None have been thus far, and none will ever be.That is a matter of opinion, which is kind of the point.
“Stupid”? Your rude retort shows me that you know you’re in the wrong. Nice projection.Ah, the dreaded scare quotes. I said I won’t waste time with that stupid argument.
That might be true to some degree. On the other hand, just look at how the politicos treat one another when it comes to gun control.I had a very pleasant conversation with a parishioner who recently returned from a weeklong deer hunting trip with family and friends. I’m not pro-gun, don’t eat venison (I’m a vegetarian), but I certainly respect his right to hunt and own a gun. This friend and I have many more things that we agree on, than the one or two things that could divide us. It’s much easier to rant at each other in anonymous chat rooms than to serve next to each other on the same parish committee where we have to work in at least a civil, if not friendly way with each other.
A very short article that’s well worth reading. In a very few words it explains why there is such a disconnect between those who support the Second Amendment and those who do not. 6 Reasons Your Right-Wing Friend Isn’t Coming To Your Side On Gun Control