P
PRmerger
Guest
Thanks for this beautiful testimony.
And welcome to the Forums!
And welcome to the Forums!
This is a 100% correct assessment of Kliska. In reading through this thread and in the Scriptural and Church teachings that has been providing to dispel a blatant falsehood or complete error presented by this individual, he /she avoids the truths with answers like ābut this is your interpretation, or that is what some believe, or we agree to disagreeā and several other dismissals of the truth. the problem is he/she is applying his/her own fallible personal interpretation without the benefit of what Christ gave His Church which is the teaching authority of the Church, that is protected from error by the Holy Spirit.Nope! Your interpretation is seriously flawed. Again, you adhere to novel belief. Not one early Church father would agree with your position. Second, what makes you believe your interpretation is correct?
As for Noah? It is not what he did or was asked to built ,it is HOW God changed their livesā¦by means of WATER! What did water remove? How did Jews escape Egypt? God opened the Red Sea and used what to save them? WATER! God used water to get rid of who? The Egyptians.
No offense,but your biblical exegesis is seriously lacking.
Of course you would say that, your perspective will allow no other way of looking at it,and I fully understand that.Nope! Your interpretation is seriously flawed.
What makes me believe? Studying the whole context, and taking him at his word that he is teaching a correspondence. It isnāt that hard to see. Obviously it does me no good to speak of the Spirit guiding me into seeing this truth, as it is just as easily rejected as I reject your stance.Again, you adhere to novel belief. Not one early Church father would agree with your position. Second, what makes you believe your interpretation is correct?
Quite the contrary the important question was how and why Noah was spared. I want to know what the ark is, and how to get on it. (That would be Jesus, and by grace through faith) Then comes the water.As for Noah? It is not what he did or was asked to built ,it is HOW God changed their livesā¦by means of WATER! What did water remove? How did Jews escape Egypt? God opened the Red Sea and used what to save them? WATER! God used water to get rid of who? The Egyptians.
Of course youād say that.No offense,but your biblical exegesis is seriously lacking.
Iām a sister in Christ, to be clear on my gender. You rely on interpretations that others hand you, instead of searching scripture with prayer and diligence to see if what others have told you are true; again, you start with the assumption that what someone else (the mageisterium) has told you is true and go from there. If you have searched scriptures then you personally have agreed to their interpretation, or else you wouldnāt belong to the RCC. You are in the same situation as I, it is just one removed, with your belief that only certain special people can be lead to truth instead of you being able to find it on you own with the help of the Spirit.This is a 100% correct assessment of Kliska. In reading through this thread and in the Scriptural and Church teachings that has been providing to dispel a blatant falsehood or complete error presented by this individual, he /she avoids the truths with answers like ābut this is your interpretation, or that is what some believe, or we agree to disagreeā and several other dismissals of the truth. the problem is he/she is applying his/her own fallible personal interpretation without the benefit of what Christ gave His Church which is the teaching authority of the Church, that is protected from error by the Holy Spirit.
I covet every prayer I can get, however, I already have the fullness of truth. The fullness of Truth is a Person, and His name is Jesus. Christ and Him crucified is the truth of the faith that we share and the foundation that never changes. There was protest long before 500 years ago and can be seen in the protestations of Paul not to change the gospel, to fight against misrepresenting it in action, and to not return to the old way of doing things.Folks like Kliska really need our prayers so that they can over come 500 years of āProtestā and return home to the fullness of truth.
At work now but will answer this tonight.Of course you would say that, your perspective will allow no other way of looking at it,and I fully understand that.
What makes me believe? Studying the whole context, and taking him at his word that he is teaching a correspondence. It isnāt that hard to see. Obviously it does me no good to speak of the Spirit guiding me into seeing this truth, as it is just as easily rejected as I reject your stance.
Quite the contrary the important question was how and why Noah was spared. I want to know what the ark is, and how to get on it. (That would be Jesus, and by grace through faith) Then comes the water.
Of course youād say that.
Iām a sister in Christ, to be clear on my gender. You rely on interpretations that others hand you, instead of searching scripture with prayer and diligence to see if what others have told you are true; again, you start with the assumption that what someone else (the mageisterium) has told you is true and go from there. If you have searched scriptures then you personally have agreed to their interpretation, or else you wouldnāt belong to the RCC. You are in the same situation as I, it is just one removed, with your belief that only certain special people can be lead to truth instead of you being able to find it on you own with the help of the Spirit.
I covet every prayer I can get, however, I already have the fullness of truth. The fullness of Truth is a Person, and His name is Jesus. Christ and Him crucified is the truth of the faith that we share and the foundation that never changes. There was protest long before 500 years ago and can be seen in the protestations of Paul not to change the gospel, to fight against misrepresenting it in action, and to not return to the old way of doing things.
Again, you are Roman Catholic for a reason, Iām a protestant for a reason, we obviously are not going to agree on everything.
Iāll try (depending on how much time I have later). Itās a little hard b/c to me this thread has been rather weird.Could you expand on that a bit?
Yes, some do. I have my self. ****Iām not saying itās bad.pocohombre;11477602 said:Donāt some Catholics speak in tongues ?
Glad to hear that.I was really starting to wonder, after some of the things said here by you and other Catholics.
Apostle v. Bishop - Differences between OfficesI donāt see in scripture where they were infallible.
To be clear there is only ONE Truth!!! I do not rely on others to hand me the truth; I rely on the Holy Spirit and the Church. When I read Sacred Scripture after praying for guidance from the Holy Spirit and try to understand what is being conveyed, and if I come away with something other than what the Church teaches, I must accept the Churches interpretation because the Church and the magisterium is the final authority and there can only be one truth. This is because it was the Church that āChristā promised to guide in āALL TRUTHā Jn 16:13 - guided by Holy Spirit into all truth. And Jn 14:26 ā āHOLY SPIRIT TO TEACHā & remind them of everything. It is in 1Tim 3:15 ā that the CHURCH is called āpillar and foundation of truthāIām a sister in Christ, to be clear on my gender. You rely on interpretations that others hand you, instead of searching scripture with prayer and diligence to see if what others have told you are true; again, you start with the assumption that what someone else (the mageisterium) has told you is true and go from there. If you have searched scriptures then you personally have agreed to their interpretation, or else you wouldnāt belong to the RCC. You are in the same situation as I, it is just one removed, with your belief that only certain special people can be lead to truth instead of you being able to find it on you own with the help of the Spirit.
I covet every prayer I can get, however, I already have the fullness of truth. The fullness of Truth is a Person, and His name is Jesus. Christ and Him crucified is the truth of the faith that we share and the foundation that never changes. There was protest long before 500 years ago and can be seen in the protestations of Paul not to change the gospel, to fight against misrepresenting it in action, and to not return to the old way of doing things.
Hi Reuben,Thanks for the post. I think this is what the OP is asking for - misunderstanding of what a Rosary prayer is.
Rosary is not only about the amount of times of asking Mary because it is not exactly just an intercessory prayer. Going with it more productively, it is also a comptemplative prayer - time spent with the Lord. Hence it is rather how much time we are willing to pray.
How is it could be a comtemplative prayer? Not sure if this is covered in this thread, but yes, it could.
Kliska,I agree, and Iām just explaining that is one idea that some protestants hold, the whole āback to the Bibleā ideology. And in this case, I believe even Tradition wouldnāt include the rosary dated back to the time of the earliest church. It sometimes boils down to earliest practice for protestants.
And that is why there can be no meaningful exchanging of ideas on such things; if a person believes this, that is great for them. The problem is that it is an endless loop. Thank you for taking the time to answer.To be clear there is only ONE Truth!!! I do not rely on others to hand me the truth; I rely on the Holy Spirit and the Church. When I read Sacred Scripture after praying for guidance from the Holy Spirit and try to understand what is being conveyed, and if I come away with something other than what the Church teaches, I must accept the Churches interpretation because the Church and the magisterium is the final authority and there can only be one truth.
Because itās an interesting and often misunderstood topic. To be fair, this discussion and its many pages has been one of the most calm. No shouting at one another, no debates, just discussion and personal feelings towards the Rosary by two groups.Is this topic going anywhere? Why so many people focus on the Rosary to criticized or defend the teachings of the Catholic Church? If we Praying the rosary with all the loved and respect, an with a beautiful intention we are not Offending God, or Jesus, also i donāt think protestants brothers are going to hell for not pray the rosary, the Rosary is not mandatory, is more a personal way to pray, why we end discussing Catholicism based on the Rosary? The rosary is a beautiful way to pray together as a family, always remembering that Mother Mary will be mad if in any moment we donāt obey and Glorify Her son as our number One, unfortunately many Catholics donāt understand that, that is why many protestant focus on those āerrorsā to criticized, although I Love Mother Mary , we have to be careful not to cross the line where we can end on Idolatry by mistake, and I think this is so well explained many times we donāt Idolize Mary, all the Glory and Adoration is for God Father and God Son Jesus Christ the King of the Universe. The Rosary is not in the Bible many people say, but computers are not in the Bible, mega churches with Big screens are not in the Bible, beach baptism is not in the Bible, and i can go on and on⦠I will told a friend the other day, if you think Iām wrong pray for me, but donāt think you are better then my, because your church rent a big arena, for make services, the same way i will do with you, pray the rosary donāt make me better then you, Is the way that i feel close to Jesus, also to express my love and respect for our Mother.
Come on PR .There is nothing in OT or NT that resembles the Rosary with itās repetitiveness.The āamount of repetitionā??
How much repetition is valid, and how much is too much? And what Bible verses tell you this?
Is 25 repetitions ok?
Your exaple showed every sentence(vs) to be different.Yes each sentence had a phrase, a refrain, in it ,kind of artistic poetry , which is what some Psalms were. yet every verse is different.Youāll have to be consistent, then, and say that the inspired author of Psalm 136 was vain and making some unnecessary ejaculations.
OK Thank you. A tradition not found in OT or beginning of new.Just a tradition.
Originally it started as a way to pray the 150 Psalms. Pebbles were kept in oneās pockets to keep track of how many Psalms one had prayed. It eventually morphed into stringed beads
I see nothing in the bible that resembles the Southern Baptist Convention ā is it your contention that Southern baptists are un-biblical?Come on PR .There is nothing in OT or NT that resembles the Rosary with itās repetitiveness.