The Satiation Of The Spirit With Truth

  • Thread starter Thread starter djeter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

djeter

Guest
http://payingattentiontothesky.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/1981-pieper.jpg?w=170&h=250

Josef Pieper moves from St. Thomas’ reflections on the destructive power of unchastity and of the preserving, perfecting, fulfilling power of chastity to a consideration of spirit and truth and how sensual joy is provoked by the sensually beautiful.

This enjoyment is made possible, oddly enough, only by the virtue of temperance and moderation. I couldn’t help but think how the world’s richest and most powerful often maintain the world’s chintziest art. It’s almost a stereotype when encountered in movies and books.

Think also the account of a woman who performs an extravagant act on the beginning of the Passion narratives in Mark: “While he (Jesus) was at Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, as he sat at the table, a woman came with an alabaster jar of very costly ointment of nard, and she broke open the jar and poured the ointment on his head.” This gesture wasting something as expensive as an entire jar of perfume — is sniffed at by the bystanders, who complain that, at the very least, the nard could have been sold and the money given to the poor.

But think of our Lord’s reaction to it: “Let her alone; why do you trouble her? She has performed a good service for me.” Authentic religion, ultimate concern, can never be hemmed in by reason alone. Flowing from the deepest place in the heart, religion resists the strictures set for it by a fussily moralizing reason (on full display in those who complain about the woman’s extravagance).

At the climax of his life, Jesus will give himself away totally, lavishly, unreasonably — and this is why the woman’s beautiful gesture is a sort of overture to the opera that will follow. And it is rooted in the sensual and the extravagance of man’s response to it. Read the Pieper essay with this scene in mind and you will see how true Temperantia creates the indispensable prerequisite for both the realization of actual good and the actual movement of man toward his goal.

Without it, the stream of the innermost human will-to-be would overflow destructively beyond all bounds, it would lose its direction and never reach the sea of perfection. Yet temperantia is not itself the stream. But it is the shore, the banks, from whose solidity the stream receives the gift of straight unhindered course, of force, descent, and velocity.

I’ve been dealing with St. Thomas’ reflections on temperance these past three days and this is sort of a final send off, perhaps the most nuanced piece of the three I carved out of Pieper’s book on the Cardinal Virtues. Hope you like it.

You can find it here:

payingattentiontothesky.com/2010/01/22/the-satiation-of-the-spirit-with-truth/

dj
 
I have Josef Piper’s book on language from Ignatius Press. Thank you for posting something that resonates with me. I’m also reminded of the encouragement of students of art, in artwork of the sort in which you refer to.
 
I have been slowly reading a collection of Joseph Pieper’s books. I have finished about 7 now, with about 5 more to go. A couple I’ve read twice (On Hope, the Silence of St. Thomas). Right now I’m working on his “What Catholics Believe” (currently out of print, unfortunately) which is one of the finest introductions to Catholic belief that I’ve ever read. This would make a great book for a well-educated potential convert. It’s beautifully written also.
 
“The current notion of the “Immaculate Conception” — current even among Christians — refers this immaculateness not so much to the person of the Virgin Mary as to the process of conception, of begetting (and often enough, as anyone can test, not to the conception of Mary, but to that of the Lord in the womb of His mother). Among people generally, this immaculateness is in any case not understood as it is understood by the Church and by theology, namely, as signifying that Mary was free from the stain of original sin from her mother’s womb.”

If we set aside that heretic Tertullian, what did St. Augustine have to say about this? Wasn’t his view that original sin was transmitted somehow by the concupiscence inevitably attached to the “process of conception”?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top