The Scientific Miracles in the Quran

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holly3278
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And if you are in doubt concerning that which We have bestowed upon Our slave (Muhammad), then produce a surah of similar merit, and call your witnesses other than Allah, if you are truthful.
Oh, try any one of the four canonical Gospels.

I call as my witnesses Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and not the entity called allah.
Here is the miracle of the koran - that over a billion people believe in it.
Here’s the miracle of the New Testament: that MORE than a billion people believe it.
 
a slave of Allah:
Allahu Akbar, God is More Great.
81. And say: ā€œTruth (i.e. IslĆ¢mic Monotheism or this Qur’ân) has come and BĆ¢til (falsehood, i.e. Satan or polytheism, etc.) has vanished. Surely! BĆ¢til is ever bound to vanish.ā€

let us see how atheists deny scientific facts, and show us that they depend on the language of science, while in fact they are far away from the scientific logic, How can I trust a (so called) mind of a person believes that everything in the universe of creation and creativity and mastery is made by blind coincidence! Since they are not convinced by God’s words or words of our scientists, we will leave their scientists to talk to them!

Criticizing the cosmological smoke

They have also criticized the verses that talk about the beginning of the universe and that it was smoke, and said that scientists have discovered that the universe was filled with hydrogen gas, and the word (smoke) mentioned in the Quran
"Then turned He to the heaven when it was smoke, and said to it and to the earth: Come both, willingly or unwillingly. They both said, ā€œWe come willingly.ā€
is not scientifically correct (they claimed), because the chemical composition of smoke is quite different from the installation of gas, and that scientists call the clouds spread in the universe, ā€œcosmic Dustā€ not ā€œsmokeā€ as the Quran claim, and the installation of dust also differs from the installation of smoke , And it is enough to find one scientific fault in the Quran to prove that it is falsified book or not from God because God does not make mistakes! This is what they say.

Now, with a little meditation in the scientists’ discoveries, people will be aware that every word came in the The Quran is right, and that atheists have nothing but lies.

See with me the last reached of NASA after picking up the cosmic dust particles, what they found, dozens of years have passed and they used the term ā€œdustā€ read with me:

This is Dr. ā€œDouglas Pierce,ā€ the scientist that supervised the analysis of dust particles from space imagery says:
ā€œUnlike household dust, cosmic ā€˜dust’ actually consists of tiny solid grains (mostly carbon and silicates) floating around in interstellar space, with similar sizes to the particles in cigarette smoke.ā€
outreach.jach.hawaii.edu/pressroom/2003_casa/

and this is one of the new articles in which the auther says:
ā€œThe dust particles that are mixed with the gas are tiny, only a fraction of a micrometer in size, and could therefore better be described as ``smoke““.ā€
chl.chalmers.se/~numa/astrophysics/molecules/molecules.html
Even astronomers in the largest space sites in the world are studying this cosmic dust and say:
ā€œCosmic dust particles are very small. To understand their size and consistency, they may best be visually compared to cigar smokeā€

saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/inst-cassini-cda-details.cfm
According to the result of laboratory analysis of this dust:
ā€œInterstellar and interplanetary dust grains between about .6 micrometers and 1.4 micrometers are captured by Jupiter’s magnetosphere, or area of magnetic influence, according to the study. Such particles are smaller than the diameter of a human hair and about the size of smoke particles.ā€
xs4all.nl/~carlkop/dustring.html

If we enumerate the words and statements of scientists around the cosmic smoke and that they were mistaken when they called it (dust) and the floor that is scientifically accurate is (the smoke), it would take many pages of this forum.

"And We reveal of the Qur’an that which is a healing and a mercy for believers though it increase the evil-doers in naught save ruin. (82)"

**36. And most of them follow nothing but conjecture. Certainly, conjecture can be of no avail against the truth. Surely, Allâh is All-Aware of what they do.
  1. And this Qur’ân is not such as could ever be produced by other than AllĆ¢h (Lord of the heavens and the earth), but it is a confirmation of (the revelation)] which was before it *, and a full explanation of the Book (i.e. laws and orders, etc, decreed for mankind) - wherein there is no doubt from the the Lord of the 'AlamĆ®n (mankind, jinns,and all that exists).
  2. Or do they say: ā€œHe (Muhammad PBUH) has forged it?ā€ Say: ā€œBring then a SĆ»rah (chapter) like unto it, and call upon whomsoever you can, besides AllĆ¢h, if you are truthful!ā€
  3. Nay, they deny that; the knowledge whereof they could not compass and whereof the interpretation has not yet come unto them. Thus those before them did deny. Then see what was the end of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.)! ***
Best wishes.
 
You know, I was just thinking and when I thought about it, I realized that the Arab civilizations were at least somewhat advanced so it is possible that they knew this stuff before the Quran was written down and therefore it is not a ā€œscientific miracleā€ for this stuff to be in the Quran. Besides that, we know that some ancient civilizations knew how to do things that we don’t know how to do today and had knowledge that we don’t have today. An example of this is the building of the pyramids. There is not a way yet known to build the pyramids using the tools that the ancient Egyptians had. At least I don’t believe so. I could be wrong though. And then there was the Library of Alexandria. It contained an immense amount of information that was lost during a fire sometime during the ancient world (I’m not sure when but I think it was after the time of Christ’s death). So yeah, it is entirely possible that the Arabs already knew this information before the first Muslims wrote it down in the Quran.
Arabs did not build the Pyramids. The Copts’ ancestors did. Arabs were invaders of Egypt, and Egypt was a Christian country with good ties to Rome for hundreds of years, so please do not perpetuate this myth. Arabs are invaders of Northern Africa, and did not have any existence there for hundreds of years.

Most Arab civilizations were nomadic, and as such had oral traditions rather than written traditions. Oral traditions are a sign of nomadic peoples, and do change from generation to generation, so anything ā€˜scientific’ about these claims is pretty laughable – and any professor (even Arab ones worth their salt) will tell you as such.
 
I m wondering to hear about this. In my opinion its not possible in the Quran.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top