K
I agree that what Rabbinical scholars say or what certain schools of Judaism decide on the moral teaching of scripture in the Christian era have little to no import for the Church. However, meltzerboy wasn’t implying that it should matter for us, merely offering a Jewish take on the article, which is of course fine. Your post comes across rather harsh, considering.Furthermore, the Church decided and dogmatically decreed sacred scripture hundreds of years ago. The thoughts of some Rabbi’s are irrelevant.
Why are thoughts of Rabbis less worthy than priests?Furthermore, the Church decided and dogmatically decreed sacred scripture hundreds of years ago. The thoughts of some Rabbi’s are irrelevant.
The NYT is a religion, albeit a secular one, and hates competition.Yeah, I would approach anything the NYT says about religion with extreme caution.
Because he hadn’t started the Catholic Church yet and he needed to go talk to His Father somewhere.Irrelevant? Then why did Christ (a Jew) continue to attend synagogue and practice Judaism?
A more accurate word than “desperation” for the article might be “childish”, which sums up various movement’s attempts to reconcile their faith with post-Sexual Revolution popularity. Desperation is still good though.That is very insightful and adds greatly to the discussion.