T
Trelow
Guest
Silly impulsive, incomplete utterance on my part. I understand the teaching of the Church. Many protestants don’t believe baptism does anything, regardless of the command to “Repent and be baptised,” hence my interjection.There can be repentance and saving faith where there is no baptismal water - and sacrilege where there is baptismal water
Baptising a kitten (as witches did, to raise storms) or a stone doesn’t confer any grace at all. Invoking the Holy Spirit over a currant bun, and baptising the currant bun in the name of the Blessed Trinity, is a waste of time, and a sin.
The “good thief” in Luke 23.43 was not baptised, he never went to confession, he was crucified for his crimes & did not deny that his punishment was just - but he had saving faith in the words of Christ Himself. That’s why the thief has a place in the calendar of saints. And he could not have had faith but for Christ.
Acts 10 shows the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the household of the Roman soldier Cornelius - before anyone was baptised. Baptism followed the reception of the Holy Spirit, rather than preceding it - just as happened in Acts 2.
Besides, without the Holy Spirit, no one can repent. To bring a sinner to repent is as great a thing as to create the world from nothing; so God alone can do it. And none of God’s works is a small thing, even when they fall outside His “usual” ways of working - which is why the Church teaches that God is not limited by or to the Sacraments; as is plain enough even without the Church’s underlining the point; for if God is Transcendent & Infinite, nothing through which He works can limit Him. The limits are in the creatures - such as the Church or the Christian. But our weakness & poverty is no limitation on God. ##