The Skeptics Annotated Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter windlessuser
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

windlessuser

Guest
Peace Brother’s in Christ,

I’ve recently came across this link, which views our sacred scriptures with much skeptisim. At first I had a good laugh; from my reading, Ive learned that since the Protestant reformation and the Advent of New Atheism, people have forgotten what the bible was meant to be or do.

It would be awesome, if you lend me your strength in formulating a proper response to this.

Thank you all
 
Blasphemy and heresy. Is this parody actually on sale somewhere?
 
Peace Brother’s in Christ,

I’ve recently came across this link, which views our sacred scriptures with much skeptisim. At first I had a good laugh; from my reading, Ive learned that since the Protestant reformation and the Advent of New Atheism, people have forgotten what the bible was meant to be or do.

It would be awesome, if you lend me your strength in formulating a proper response to this.

Thank you all
Proper response is to ignore it. The more outrage and press coverage something gets, the more likely it will sell.

If you simply can’t help yourself, just simply say “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.” Shakespear, The Merchant of Venice
 
There is not much you can do about the Skeptics Annotated Bible. If you want to respond to it though perhaps you should consider evangelizing to atheists. I do this and although it can be very frustrating it can also be very rewarding.
 
There is no proper response to foolishness that does not become foolishness itself.

Answer a fool in his folly and you will be like him.

Proverbs 26:4,5
 
Why is anyone surprised at this in an age where XXXXXX rated pornography is common? All of this sort of thing is little more that contemptuous intellectual masturbation, and it is only ego publishers (those the author has to pay) that will print these books.
All we can and should do is to pray for the souls of the authors and any poor young people that are corrupted by such filth.
 
Peace Brother’s in Christ,

I’ve recently came across this link, which views our sacred scriptures with much skeptisim. At first I had a good laugh; from my reading, Ive learned that since the Protestant reformation and the Advent of New Atheism, people have forgotten what the bible was meant to be or do.

It would be awesome, if you lend me your strength in formulating a proper response to this.

Thank you all
Here are good principles that ought to bear upon a response:
youtube.com/watch?v=51rR4aC9aMg

I am reminded of Proverbs 26:4-5, “Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.”
 
Separate and appart from that, Within that secularist group, I had this to say. Please warn me if I said anything heretical 🙂

I was planning to write about marriage, but this issue came up while I was talking to Gavin Robinson. There’s been a tantamount of Misinformation and that’s lead to the break down of quite a
few things. Personally, I blame the protestant reformation. The heretics took one book and made it into something it’s not. This lead to much disunity in the Christian community, leading to all
sorts of bad stuff including twisted views of God. My Goal here is to bring understanding, So I’ll try my best to clear up a few things.

As a book, the bible doesn’t teach; it cannot teach; PEOPLE teach. The bible is NOT a scientific treatise, or is it an exhaustive list of christian doctrine. It was written to tell us Who God is, what he created and why, and what he expects from us. Basically, a starting point in getting to know him. It’s a rather complex book that would take years & years of study to truly get what the writers were saying, that it would be much easier to use the other simpler literature that was written over the last 1300 years. It’s is not the Be all or End all of christianity, just one part of a 3 legged stool the church uses to teach its people.

But if not the bible, where does Christian Doctrine come from? All christian Doctrine (read the first principles) were taught by Jesus. The apostles (his 1st students) then began developing on those first principles as their understanding grew, and so on and so on with their students and students’ students. The doctrines do not change, we just grow more in understanding. Thus, when a new modern day issue come up that wasn’t addressed, the bishops go back to 1st principles to address it, if they care to that is. The primary goal of the church(as an accident of us being devoted to God) is to develop in you a conscience using these first principles. Once your formed in this, and are still willing to learn, you can decide for your self almost anything, provided you don’t violate those first principles. That’s right, you are free to disagree with the church(Bishops and Priests disagree with each other all time, even with the pope), because that’s how conversations work! We learn from each other from our differing view points. All that’s important is that all parties respect those 1st principles, and if necessary submit their pride and will to them out of obedience. What I mean is, think of gravity. You and I may discuss ways to circumvent gravity. I may say we can use a form of Thrust, while you may propose a way to nullify the effect all together. We may disagree with our ideas, but we both agree that we are both subject to the force of gravity.

Devotion to God aside, at the end of the day, you use your own conscience to aid you in making your own choices, wether or not they are for the better or worse for yourself or mankind. We’re not drones. To say further, we Devote ourselves to God not because he demands us to, or because it is the right thing to do. We do because we chose to love him, and why we love him depends on the
person and their own relationship with him.

Hope this helps.
 
Looks like an interesting volume to add to a Bible collection and study library. If it’s on Amazon I’m going to order a copy.
 
Looks like an interesting volume to add to a Bible collection and study library. If it’s on Amazon I’m going to order a copy.
Sure, they’ll be very happy to make some more bucks through their sacrilegious and sinful book 😃
 
Sure, they’ll be very happy to make some more bucks through their sacrilegious and sinful book 😃
It’s a “sin” to question and seek? It’s sacrilige to want to examine all the claims that conservative Christians make about the inerrancy and no contradictions in scripture?

I tought even the scriptures have God saying…“Come now, let us reason together…”

We don’t need to be fearful of books…they are just words on a page…books can’t sin by the way.🙂
 
I was taking a look at that, it is so poorly written that it only really affects you if you are a fundamentalist, Biblical literalist…
 
Proper response is to ignore it. The more outrage and press coverage something gets, the more likely it will sell.

If you simply can’t help yourself, just simply say “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.” Shakespear, The Merchant of Venice
I would say that we have here a great tool to evangelize. And, the references to descrepancies make it easier :D.

For instance, Jesus was not the first resurrected (technically and historically true in the flesh only), but that’s forgetting what resurrection is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top