P
Per_Crucem
Guest
That was back when Jon was in the ELCA.
That was back when Jon was in the ELCA.
That was back when Jon was in the ELCA.
That was back when Jon was in the ELCA.
Thanks for taking the time to post this. There is a sort of similarity in your Summary Rule and Norm of the Epitome and the position thatās recently been discussed, in that both believe the church has authority. Other than that, I donāt perceive any meaningful similarity in which a theoretical unity is achieved.The language here is quite strong in support of the creeds, that one could infer this āassistanceā of the Holy Spirit in their writing. Even in the second paragraph can include that inferenceā¦Obviously, there is a difference in degrees, but I thought what PR and Randy were saying has a similarity to this. Jon
The church has authority [to]⦠authoritatively proclaim the Word of God, as itās been granted us in Scripture. I think thatās the big point that surprised me. It does not have the authority to create new doctrines, which is typically the Lutheran and Reformed objection to Catholicismās emphasis on Tradition, but rather only to uncover authoritative Traditions (Like the Creeds, which cannot be at odds with that of the Scriptures). In other words, the Catholic Church (or at least those within the Church who hold the view weāve been discussing) stops just short of calling Scripture the āSole Rule and Norm of all doctrine⦠by which, all other teachings and teachers are to be judged.āThanks for taking the time to post this. There is a sort of similarity in your Summary Rule and Norm of the Epitome and the position thatās recently been discussed, in that both believe the church has authority. Other than that, I donāt perceive any meaningful similarity in which a theoretical unity is achieved.