The "Squeeze"

  • Thread starter Thread starter roseproject
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

roseproject

Guest
I’m not sure what category this would go under, but…

Anyone know why people sometimes give each other a squeeze after saying the Our Father? Y’know, when you’re holding the other person’s hand and the other person squeezes your hand after the prayer is done. Why do people do this?? xD

Thanks in advance 🙂
 
At first I thought (hoped) the title referred to Squeeze, Singles: 45s and Under.
 
This is an important part of mass for me. It symbolizes our unity and combined faith. For me, it is a powerful expression of our devotion and love to God not only as individuals but as a church.
 
I think it’s because we feel strength in unity of our faith, so people express with a squeeze
 
Well, like the handshake it seems meaningless. And over familiar from folk doing it because the liturgy says so. I close my eyes and hide my hands
 
Just holding hands can be quite painful for me with arthritic fingers. The final “squeeze” is added agony for me. The thing is, many people have the mistaken idea that this is the part of the Mass in which we demonstrate our love for one another. Really? By a handshake? Even the most duplicitous car dealer willing shakes your hand and smiles warmly. It doesn’t mean anything in reality. The sign of our unity is the Eucharist, not a mere handshake. I too wish it would be eliminated or if some form of acknowledgement has to be shared with our fellow worshipers it ought to be a bow of the head and an offer of “God bless you” and nothing more.
 
I have seen people choose not to hold hands but, rather, only hold their hands up in personal praise. No one should feel forced, if that is the sentiment.
 
I have seen people choose not to hold hands but, rather, only hold their hands up in personal praise. No one should feel forced, if that is the sentiment.
Indeed, no one should feel forced, I heartily agree. 🙂 I have tried not shaking hands and been given the “evil eye” in response. Hardly a moment of “unity and peace.” 😛 People are so used to shaking hands they think it is a mandatory part of Mass, when it’s an option that can be dispensed at the discretion of the celebrant. In some parishes it becomes a free-for-all in which people wander all over the church greeting people like they were at a party. And the “sign of peace” often lingers well into the Lamb of God. I’d be relieved if the SOP were eliminated all together. I am convinced that, after a while–not all that long in reality, no one would miss it.
 
I could never imagine myself refusing to shake the hand of a person who reaches out to me.

Same is true of holding hands during the Lord’s prayer. If a person reaches for my hand, I will gladly accept.

I know the feeling of being snubbed and would never want to send that message to another person in the name of Jesus Christ during Mass.

Jim
 
I could never imagine myself refusing to shake the hand of a person who reaches out to me.
You aren’t a 66 year old woman with arthritic hands who has had them squeezed so hard tears came to her eyes, either. I’ve learned to extend my hand palm down, look the other person straight in the eye, and smile sweetly. It usually keeps the other person from grasping my hand in a vise-like grip–as if I were a criminal about to escape custody. 😛 Still, if the SOP were eliminated I’d be the first to cheer.
Same is true of holding hands during the Lord’s prayer. If a person reaches for my hand, I will gladly accept.
Holding hands is in no way mandatory so I have politely smiled, bowed my head and kept my hands to myself. I hold my dh’s hand, but then he knows how to hold my hand without hurting me.
I know the feeling of being snubbed and would never want to send that message to another person in the name of Jesus Christ during Mass.
It isn’t a “snub” to not do something one is not obligated to do–not in the rubrics nor in charity. Let families hold hands if they want to, but everyone holding hands is a false sign of “unity” that ought to be squashed because it is not the sign of unity–the Eucharist is–and that’s where our attention should be right after the SOP not on getting back to our seats and talking to others.
 
Della;
You aren’t a 66 year old woman with arthritic hands who has had them squeezed so hard tears came to her eyes, either. I’ve learned to extend my hand palm down, look the other person straight in the eye, and smile sweetly. It usually keeps the other person from grasping my hand in a vise-like grip–as if I were a criminal about to escape custody. 😛 Still, if the SOP were eliminated I’d be the first to cheer.
Well I’m a 64 year old, and know that letting the other person know of your issues can be done politely.
Holding hands is in no way mandatory so I have politely smiled, bowed my head and kept my hands to myself. I hold my dh’s hand, but then he knows how to hold my hand without hurting me.
Nor is returning a hello to another person who says hello mandatory. But it says a lot about who you are when you refuse the kindness.

Holding hands during the Lord’s prayer at Mass isn’t in the rubrics, but it isn’t prohibited either.

If the parish you’re attending Mass at holds hands and the person next to reaches out, swallow your pride and hold their hand. If it’s too painful, just show them your hand in a polite gesture.

We hold hands at my parish and we have many people who visit, being we’re a town with six lakes.

I’ve had people let me know they have a cold when they point at their nose and let me know they don’t want to hold my hand and I understand that it’s their charity that their informing me. I give them a gesture of thanks in return.

Jim
 
Della; Well I’m a 64 year old, and know that letting the other person know of your issues can be done politely.
And you do that at the time? How, exactly. Do you say, “Excuse me, but I have arthritic fingers, so would you please not squeeze my hand?” There’s no time to “explain” to someone holding out his hand and expecting to shake it right then and there. I’ve trusted and then winced, and moaned in pain–real pain, but it makes no difference to the other person because by then he’s moved on to someone else and my hand is hurting. No, better to simply bow and smile if need be. Others should understand that shaking hands is not a pleasant experience for everyone.
Nor is returning a hello to another person who says hello mandatory. But it says a lot about who you are when you refuse the kindness.
Hello is not the greeting we give each other at the SOP, is it? It’s “God bless you.” I can say that perfectly well without getting my hand squeezed.
Holding hands during the Lord’s prayer at Mass isn’t in the rubrics, but it isn’t prohibited either.
It is not to be done parish wide, with all and sundry–with people crossing aisles and the priest descending from the sanctuary but it’s done all the time under the false idea that it’s somehow “unifying.” Instead of encouraging this idea, the priest ought to instruct people that holding hands is fine for family and friends, if desired, but that it is not to be done otherwise. It would restore a great deal of peace and reverence if done properly.
If the parish you’re attending Mass at holds hands and the person next to reaches out, swallow your pride and hold their hand. If it’s too painful, just show them your hand in a polite gesture.
Whenever someone resorts to personal attacks, I know they are arguing from a weak position. I’m not moved by this. Try again. 😉 See my answer above about attempting to make others “understand” within a second’s time it takes to shake hands. :rolleyes:
We hold hands at my parish and we have many people who visit, being we’re a town with six lakes.
How nice for your parish. Frankly, I’d rather not be molested merely because I happen to visit your town no matter how many lakes it has.
I’ve had people let me know they have a cold when they point at their nose and let me know they don’t want to hold my hand and I understand that it’s their charity that their informing me. I give them a gesture of thanks in return.
And I’ve said, “contagious” when I have a cold, as well, so I won’t pass on germs, but that’s hardly the point.

I won’t be bullied into doing an action that is not part of the rubric just to give someone a feeling of “inclusion.” I will shake hands, judiciously, if I am able, if the SOP is done, but I am perfectly free to refuse if necessary. And no amount of “shaming” by others will make me change my mind.

Please carry on with any more comments you wish to make. I’m done.
 
“rather not be molested” in the previous post pretty much explains the mindset here. :rolleyes:

It isn’t difficult to be polite in showing another person you have arthritic hands and prefer not to hold hands, or shake hands.

I’d suggest you could hug at the sign of peace instead, but heaven forbid!

Jim
 
I thought it was the “let go now” signal? 😃
👍

That’s exactly right! It’s a subtle gesture–a head’s up–that you’re now going to remove your hand from theirs. At least that’s how I’ve always taken it, and how I’ve employed it. It makes much more sense, when you’ve held someone’s hand…who’s kind of dosed off, and unconsciously resisted letting go-because they were off in la-la land. That can be very awkward. A gentle squeeze snaps them back to reality, and everyone intuitively knows what comes immediately next: Release.

jmho/fwiw.
 
I’ve had many ppl. decline to hold my hand, or shake my hand. Never once took it personally; almost always, it prompts me to petition our Lord for a blessing on the person, for whatever must be ailing them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top