The SSPX (without a flamewar)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maximilian75
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay.

My question has been answered.

Mods, if you see fit, this thread can be closed.

I’m gonna stick around though haha
 
Technicality- The EF is more than just Latin, but I get what you mean
 
Art. 2. In Masses celebrated without a congregation, any Catholic priest of the Latin rite, whether secular or regular, may use either the Roman Missal published in 1962 by Blessed Pope John XXIII or the Roman Missal promulgated in 1970 by Pope Paul VI, and may do so on any day, with the exception of the Easter Triduum. For such a celebration with either Missal, the priest needs no permission from the Apostolic See or from his own Ordinary.

From the letter that Benedict wrote introducing SP. I bolded for emphases.
 
Maximilian75 said:
If that current status is one of separation, what’s holding them back from full communion? Why won’t they join the FSSP or a similar order?
Click to expand...
I think they would want separate status, instead of being subservient to another order like the FSSP. IMO, if the SSPX were offered sui juris status, they would go for it. As you may know, there are more than a dozen Eastern sui juris churches, but only one in the west.
 
So? That doesn’t mean it is still not a valid, teaching council.
If you do not accept it, you are separating yourself from the Church, just like the SSPX did, hence this thread.
 
So a dogmatic Council is on the same level as a non-dogmatic one?
 
Vatican II did not declare any new dogmas, it expanded the teaching on dogmas to bring us out of the middle ages.
 
The same level of assent? And let me ask you this: did Vatican II enjoy infallibility?
 
There was nothing wrong with the Middle Ages. Vatican II just made things worse.
 
There is only one teaching that has ever invoked infalibility.
Please see upthread.
 
That is your opinion.
Many, many people around the world, including most clergy, do not agree with you.
 
Nothing wrong with the Middle Ages. Maybe you should make that more specific. Plague comes to mind.
 
Disregard… posted on the wrong thread
 
Last edited:
Not sure why that quoted me. I agree, the plague is just one thing…
no penicillin
no vaccines at all
no refrigeration
no electricity
woman were considered property

Shall I go on?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top