The sufficiency of Christ

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2nd_Adam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah, but I have a Calvinist Protestant here but he’s not answering the question…
There are many many more grounded non-Calvinist Protestants who can expound the sufficiency of Christ much better than I can. Therefore, this topic cannot be commingled with Calvinism because Calvinism is not the gospel. The topic of the sufficiency of Christ is the heart of the gospel.
 
There are many many more grounded non-Calvinist Protestants who can expound the sufficiency of Christ much better than I can. Therefore, this topic cannot be commingled with Calvinism because Calvinism is not the gospel. The topic of the sufficiency of Christ is the heart of the gospel.
It must be commingled with Calvinism however, because non-Calvinist Christians whether Protestant or Catholic hold to very similar views on this. Unless of course your referring to pseudo Calvinists, who hold to parts of TULIP but not all? These are still Calvinists however. Maybe you need to define what you mean by sufficiency, in exact terms.
 
I try to speak the truth in love imperfectly with my dear Mormon neighbors for their sake alone. I want them to be united to Christ and worship our great Triune God. 🙂

For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ. - Apostle Paul
On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
“What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
He answered: " ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[a]; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’
" “You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”

Questions: Do you really think your attitude toward Zerinus is loving? Did you become a Calvinist because of someone witnessing to you the way you are witnessing to Zerinus?

But anyway…

You have refused to address the point that you are misrepresenting Catholic teaching. Don’t you fear “bearing false witness against your neighbor?”

Who has the agenda now, I wonder?:rolleyes:

Play fair, 2nd.

❤️ Love is Patient
 
That’s the trouble, he doesn’t answer questions or at least ones that Calvinism is ill-equipped to answer. I’ve posed many already that he simply has no answer for, or at the very least won’t grace me with one.
You can post all of your Calvinism questions of the Calvinism thread created for that particular purpose.
 
It must be commingled with Calvinism however, because non-Calvinist Christians whether Protestant or Catholic hold to very similar views on this. Unless of course your referring to pseudo Calvinists, who hold to parts of TULIP but not all? These are still Calvinists however. Maybe you need to define what you mean by sufficiency, in exact terms.
The issue is not about predestination. The issues are about sufficiency, adoption through propitiation, forensic justification, imputation, and substitutionary atonement. These are more Protestant views, and not exclusively Reformed views.
 
On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
“What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
He answered: " ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[a]; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’
" “You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”

Questions: Do you really think your attitude toward Zerinus is loving? Did you become a Calvinist because of someone witnessing to you the way you are witnessing to Zerinus?

But anyway…

You have refused to address the point that you are misrepresenting Catholic teaching. Don’t you fear “bearing false witness against your neighbor?”

Who has the agenda now, I wonder?:rolleyes:

Play fair, 2nd.

❤️ Love is Patient
I think I have loved Zerinus more than you have in regard to what really matters. The truth divides.
 
I try to speak the truth in love imperfectly with my dear Mormon neighbors for their sake alone. I want them to be united to Christ and worship our great Triune God. 🙂

For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ. - Apostle Paul
I have a question to ask you now. Which do you love more, Calvinism or the truth? Which do you love more, Calvinism or the Bible?

I think that the answer in both cases is Calvinism.
 
I have a question to ask you now. Which do you love more, Calvinism or the truth? Which do you love more, Calvinism or the Bible?

I think that the answer in both cases is Calvinism.
Question: Why are you a Morman instead of a Catholic? Not that it really matters to me just wondering, since the CC does not accept Mormans as Christians. I accept you tho as a friend, is that okay? I have some Mormen relatives and I love them all.👍
 
The issue is not about predestination. The issues are about sufficiency, adoption through propitiation, forensic justification, imputation, and substitutionary atonement. These are more Protestant views, and not exclusively Reformed views.
OK, well obviously it you’re stuck on propitiation and imputation as the methods alone for sufficiency then I’d say that the Catholic view is clearly more “sufficient”. Although it should be noted that not all protestants hold to these views. An expiation of sin is more efficient and sufficient as they cause an actual change to the problem, which is sin. Unless of course your argument is that the problem is God and His wrath. Which I would think would be an awkward position for a Christian to take. I know I certainly view sin and not God as the problem in my life.

Imputation vs infusion depends like above on what you see the problem as. If sin is the problem then infusion of righteousness is the only method that can be truly sufficient in its removal, if the problem is God then I suppose imputation is at least a more direct route to success as God then allows himself to be distracted from His wrath.

Most of the terms you’ve set out all revolve around the above concepts. We know from Romans 3:21 that God’s justice is formed without the law, which would seem to not be in line with some reformer’s ideas on forensic justification.
 
Hi dear sister in the Lord. What do you think of my new icon designation of :hug1::hug1::hug1: (Evangelicals and Catholics together icon)?
Do you think that will make up for your obfuscations, and refusal to give straight answers to straight questions, and taking people for fools and insulting their intelligence? Do you think that people are so stupid that they will fall for that?
 
Do you think that will make up for your obfuscations, and refusal to give straight answers to straight questions, and taking people for fools and insulting their intelligence? Do you think that people are so stupid that they will fall for that?
I am not stupid thank you very much and I agree with Adam on a bunch of things maybe not everything, But 90%. He is my dear brother in Christ.:clapping:
 
Question: Why are you a Morman instead of a Catholic?
I am a Mormon because I know that it is true. But I also have a lot of respect for the Catholic Church.
Not that it really matters to me just wondering, since the CC does not accept Mormans as Christians.
I am not too sure about that. As far as I am aware the CC has not made an official declaration to that effect.
I accept you tho as a friend, is that okay?
That is okay by me! 🙂
I have some Mormen relatives and I love them all.👍
And I love my Catholic friends too.
 
I am not stupid thank you very much and I agree with Adam on a bunch of things maybe not everything, But 90%. He is my dear brother in Christ.:clapping:
You are welcome to him for all I care. The poor guy doesn’t seem to have a lot of friends round here.
 
I am a Mormon because I know that it is true. But I also have a lot of respect for the Catholic Church.

I am not too sure about that. As far as I am aware the CC has not made an official declaration to that effect.

That is okay by me! 🙂

And I love my Catholic friends too.
Well I went to a conference kast year Catholic and that is what we wer told. Even have a paper that stated all the Churches that aren’t reconnized.an d Morman was one of them. Doesn’t matter to me you are still my friend and God Bless you on your journey with Christ.:tiphat:
 
You are welcome to him for all I care. The poor guy doesn’t seem to have a lot of friends round here.
He has me and always will.:love: I don’t agree with everything you Church does or says, but I you are still my friend.
 
Well I went to a conference kast year Catholic and that is what we wer told. Even have a paper that stated all the Churches that aren’t reconnized.an d Morman was one of them. Doesn’t matter to me you are still my friend and God Bless you on your journey with Christ.:tiphat:
I don’t know about that; but I am not aware of any official statement from the Catholic Church to that effect. If you know of one, perhaps you would be kind enough to share it with me.
 
I don’t know about that; but I am not aware of any official statement from the Catholic Church to that effect. If you know of one, perhaps you would be kind enough to share it with me.
I am on my way to Dinner before I go to Mass, so probably won’t get back to youbefore in the morning. If I can find my paper I will.
 
I think I have loved Zerinus more than you have in regard to what really matters. The truth divides.
That’s really all you have to say for yourself?

I ask you, again, 2nd, how did you become a Calvinist Protestant? Did someone witness to you the same way you have acted towards Zerinus? If that’s the case, ok, then your attitude towards him makes sense. If that’s not the case, then why do you think it’s going to make him want to believe what you believe?

And I’m still waiting for you to acknowledge that you have a double standard. You say that Zerinus has misrepresented Calvinism, but you refuse to acknowledge that you misrepresent the Catholic faith.

Something tells me, though, that I will be waiting a long, long time on that.

So much for the :hug1: Emoticons are easy.

Respectful consideration of the Catholic faith evidently is hard. 😦

❤️ Love is Patient
 
I have a question to ask you now. Which do you love more, Calvinism or the truth? Which do you love more, Calvinism or the Bible?

I think that the answer in both cases is Calvinism.
Pilate said to him, “What is truth?”

So, what is truth Zerinus?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top