L
LiamNL
Guest
Very interesting book. Deals with a jewish man (Simon Wiesenthal) who’s in a concentration camp in Poland. While on work duty, off of the camp’s grounds, at a school he used to attend when he was younger (which is now a military hospital) he gets called into a hospital room by a nurse.
He’s brought to an SS man who’s very close to dying. This SS man wants to essentially confess some terrible things he has done to Simon (a Jew) and possibly be granted some type of forgiveness from Simon.
The SS man relays a terrible story to Simon. Mind you, Simon is still currently a prisoner in a concentration camp. After the man, who is as contrite as one can be, finishes his story and his request Simon simply walks away… saying nothing to the SS man. Forcing him to die tormented (assuming God didn’t grant him the grace of a peaceful mind after that confession… independent of Simon’s response to it).
The rest of the book has respondents writing to Simon as to how they would have acted in that situation. If forgiveness should have been granted. Simon actually solicts them for advice after he got out of the camp. People ranging from Jean Avery to The Dali Lama to Dennis Prager and to Cardinal Koenig (Konig).
Maybe I’m coming at this all wrong… but sometimes the responses are frustrating. And, it’s almost always from a Catholic respondent who seems almost embarrassed and angry at the Church’s response to the Holocaust.
One respondent (Alan L. Berger) essentially says (paraphrased) “if the Catholic Church was so deficient so as to not be able to impress its morality upon young men who would eventually become Nazi’s then shame on that Church”.
Numerous things can contribute to the weakend impact that a faith should have on its adherents. The same Church who he feels should take the blame is also the same Church that produced a Maximillian Kolbe.
Curious if anyone else has read this book… how they feel about it. maybe if they even have some corrections for the way that I’m reacting to the respondents.
Thank you.
He’s brought to an SS man who’s very close to dying. This SS man wants to essentially confess some terrible things he has done to Simon (a Jew) and possibly be granted some type of forgiveness from Simon.
The SS man relays a terrible story to Simon. Mind you, Simon is still currently a prisoner in a concentration camp. After the man, who is as contrite as one can be, finishes his story and his request Simon simply walks away… saying nothing to the SS man. Forcing him to die tormented (assuming God didn’t grant him the grace of a peaceful mind after that confession… independent of Simon’s response to it).
The rest of the book has respondents writing to Simon as to how they would have acted in that situation. If forgiveness should have been granted. Simon actually solicts them for advice after he got out of the camp. People ranging from Jean Avery to The Dali Lama to Dennis Prager and to Cardinal Koenig (Konig).
Maybe I’m coming at this all wrong… but sometimes the responses are frustrating. And, it’s almost always from a Catholic respondent who seems almost embarrassed and angry at the Church’s response to the Holocaust.
One respondent (Alan L. Berger) essentially says (paraphrased) “if the Catholic Church was so deficient so as to not be able to impress its morality upon young men who would eventually become Nazi’s then shame on that Church”.
Numerous things can contribute to the weakend impact that a faith should have on its adherents. The same Church who he feels should take the blame is also the same Church that produced a Maximillian Kolbe.
Curious if anyone else has read this book… how they feel about it. maybe if they even have some corrections for the way that I’m reacting to the respondents.
Thank you.