J
That’s why the Roman Missal enshrined customs like bowing or genuflecting at communion and the Incarnation in the Creed and the slight bow of one’s head at the name of Jesus, etc. Sadly, many of these things are neglected or not even taught.
- To promote active participation, the people should be encouraged to take part by means of acclamations, responses, psalmody, antiphons, and songs, as well as by actions, gestures, and bodily attitudes. And at the proper times all should observe a reverent silence.
That may be “practice” in your parish, or the parish in which you are being instructed, but I would not count on it elsewhere. I’ve not been instructed to kneel since the USCCB established standing as the norm in the US.and to kneel if we were receiving on the tongue.
Hmm… no, not really. Maybe it was a common practice in various regions in the past, but with the new GIRM, the gesture of bowing before receiving the Eucharist in either species is now normative.The “bowing” thing in the USA is regional to a large degree.
No, it’s in the GIRM in the same way that holding hands during the Our Father is not.The “bowing” thing in the USA is regional to a large degree.
So what are you or anyone else going to do about it if they do not? I haven’t seen anyone denied Holy Communion over lack of a bow, ever. Nor have I seen the priests taking them aside and speaking to them, or making an announcement from the pulpit.There is no excuse, including lack of training, that can justify a Catholic not following the instruction for Mass contained in the GIRM.
That may be for you. I would clarify that of all the churches where I saw no bows, maybe 1 or at most 2 of them might have been called “progressive”. The rest were just the usual bunch of working- to middle-class Catholics turning the crank as usual.I live in a very progressive area in a very progressive state on the east coast and our parish is also progressive, which may be why no one bows.