J
jakasaki
Guest
:compcoff:Have a look at this !
Inexcusable!!!
You are posting this as if there are no women of marring age on earth to satisfy a muslim man and therefore he must “tag” a toddler for his future bride. Pathetic.
:compcoff:Have a look at this !
Cannot tally, inconsistent, looking for lame excuses….In short…your religious books are CORRUPTED.as Ibn hisham says, Ayshaa accepted Islam 3 years after the prphethood hof Prophet Muhammad and married him 10 years after the prophethood of Prophet Muhammad! if in time of marriage she was six years old so how can she accepted Islam 7 years ago?!
If we accept that she was at least 9 years old when she accepted islam, so she must be 16 when she married with prophet.
In the other hand, all revayats which say that she was six or seven or nine when married to prophet are said by Ayshaa! and women like to say married in youngest ages.
Know have a look at your prophets in your bible!! Ebraham married his sister!(Genesis20:12) and Lot Who had sex with his girls!(Genesis19:30-38) and Solomon who has 1000 wives(1Kings11) and David who had sex with a woman who had a husband and killed his husband!(2Samuel11:2-27)
.In short…your religious books are CORRUPTED.as Ibn hisham says, Ayshaa accepted Islam 3 years after the prphethood hof Prophet Muhammad and married him 10 years after the prophethood of Prophet Muhammad! if in time of marriage she was six years old so how can she accepted Islam 7 years ago?!
If we accept that she was at least 9 years old when she accepted islam, so she must be 16 when she married with prophet.
In the other hand, all revayats which say that she was six or seven or nine when married to prophet are said by Ayshaa! and women like to say married in youngest ages.
Know have a look at your prophets in your bible!! Ebraham married his sister!(Genesis20:12) and Lot Who had sex with his girls!(Genesis19:30-38) and Solomon who has 1000 wives(1Kings11) and David who had sex with a woman who had a husband and killed his husband!(2Samuel11:2-27)
QUOTE=friendship;6136506]
It is appeal to number fallacy.
Sunnis aren’t real muslims…Sunnis are more but it does not mean that they are real muslims.
Misinterpretation fallacy. No darling. my text does not mean that!:compcoff:
Inexcusable!!!
You are posting this as if there are no women of marring age on earth to satisfy a muslim man and therefore he must “tag” a toddler for his future bride. Pathetic.
:stretcher:.In short…your religious books are CORRUPTED.
Misinterpretation fallacy. I never said sunnis are bnot real muslims, but vahhabism yes sunnis and shiahs say that they are not muslim. As I showed what done in september11 2001 is aganst Quran and so against Islam. IS it so hard to understand it?Sunnis aren’t real muslims…
Shia aren’t real muslims…
Ahmadi aren’t real muslims…
Wahabi’s aren’t real muslims…
Will the real muslims please stand up… please stand up…!!!
Will the real islam please stand up… please stand up…!!!
Salam my former muslim neghbour. You say it because you need them to show real islam is like them. but I showed that they did against Islam. You can think that they are muslims, but is is true? of course not.
It is appeal to number fallacy. Sunnis are more but it does not mean that they are real muslims.
If you realy want understand the shiah view these links:
al-islam.org
shiatc.org
shiamultimedia.com
valiasr-aj.com
QUOTEQuote: friendship
**Misinterpretation fallacy. I never said sunnis are bnot real muslims, **
Whoa there!!!but vahhabism yes sunnis and shiahs say that they are not muslim. As I showed what done in september11 2001 is aganst Quran and so against Islam. IS it so hard to understand it?
Please provide a support for this claim. It may depend on how you define “non-combatants.” But the killing of women, children, and monks/clergy is clearly forbidden.Islam and Non-Combatants
The argument that Islam forbids the killing of non-combatants is yet another dangerous myth about Islam. The truth is Islamic legal authorities permit the liquidation of non-combatants, provided they live in such a way as to assist the enemies of Islam. In other words, if they are mere citizens or visitors of countries or societies in which Islam’s targets exist, they’re ‘fair-game’.
The “horrific” act in question was a raid on a caravan during a sacred month. This does not warrant the conclusion you draw.**Indeed, it was the Nakhla Raid, extending as far back as the life and times of Muhammad himself, that established a key principle of Jihad: ANY ACT, HOWEVER HORRIFIC, THAT SOMEHOW BENEFITS MUSLIMS, IS JUSTIFIABLE. **
Wahhabi Islam is a reformist movement dating from the late 18th century, attempting to return to what they consider pure, original Islam. They would say that Shi’ites and Sufis are not real Muslims, I believe. “Real Islam,” like “real Christianity,” is defined differently depending on your theological starting point.Al-Qaida & Bin-Ladan are not real muslims. They follow a radical cult which called vahabism.
Whoa there?!Whoa there!!!
You wrote "Sunnis are more but it does not mean that they are real muslims."
Hi, Edwin. Vahabism is not real islam. you can see more things about it by a Great Muslim scientist here: al-islam.org/wahhabismWahhabi Islam is a reformist movement dating from the late 18th century, attempting to return to what they consider pure, original Islam. They would say that Shi’ites and Sufis are not real Muslims, I believe. “Real Islam,” like “real Christianity,” is defined differently depending on your theological starting point.
I think that arguing over who is a “real Muslim” is unprofitable. Defenders of Islam say that bin Laden isn’t a “real Muslim.” Anti-Islamic polemicists say that bin Laden and friends are the “real Muslims” and more moderate Muslims aren’t really following Islam.
How about we just set this category aside and accept that anyone who identifies themselves with a particular religion is in fact a member of that religion?
Edwin
The book to which you link explicitly speaks of Wahhabism and “other Islamic sects,” which goes against your point.Hi, Edwin. Vahabism is not real islam. you can see more things about it by a Muslim Great scientist here: al-islam.org/wahhabism
And I’m afraid that your post depends on an interpretation of the Qur’an that not all Muslims share. Bin Laden would simply respond that Americans are working mischief in the land, and for that matter are murdering Muslims, and thus can be killed with impunity.And in my post I explained that they work in september11, 2001 is against Quran.
Hi Edwin. darling in that book you can see enough reasons for this fack that vahabism is not the real Islam. If you have any answer for that please say it to me. Our sunni brothers have many books about vahabism like this or this but they are in Arabic.The book to which you link explicitly speaks of Wahhabism and “other Islamic sects,” which goes against your point.
Wahhabism is certainly not traditional Islam. It is a modern movement. I respect your right (if you are a Muslim–your profile just says that you believe in “love”) to refuse to recognize them. But as a non-Muslim I have no ground on which to recognize something called “real Islam.” It isn’t a phrase that means anything to me. There is just a historical phenomenon called Islam, and Wahhabism is clearly part of that. I don’t like Wahhabism. In fact I hate it, and its analogues in Christianity. But that’s not a basis for a statement regarding what is or is not “real Islam.”
I think I’ve answered before. What thay done before and do today is against Quran and that verse shows that they are against Quran.And I’m afraid that your post depends on an interpretation of the Qur’an that not all Muslims share. Bin Laden would simply respond that Americans are working mischief in the land, and for that matter are murdering Muslims, and thus can be killed with impunity.
Edwin
Fight between cults, huh?! Christians will be pleased! It is better we do not talk eatchother about our cults. we just say that this believe or this movement is not the islamic in my believe and so we’ll not have cult’s war!contarini, your posts #48 and #49 are good, about Wahabism. You seem to have good information. Your last sentence in your post was also very good, i.e. any one who says that he is a Muslim is a Muslim.
I will soon post some matter on this subject about Wahabism and who is a real Muslim. Presently, I give one important Hadith on this subject:
The Prophet Muhammad said, “Any one who recites the Kalimah that “there is no God except Allah and Muhammad is a messenger of Allah”, and he eats from our food and he faces the ka’abah for prayers, is a Muslim. There is a guarantee for his safety from Allah and the prophet. So, you all believers, please do not break that pledge of safety.”
At another instance, when census was being carried out in Madinah, the workers asked the prophet Muhammad about whom to count as a Muslim (because there were christians and Jews and pagans living in the city), whom to count as a Muslim, the prophet replied “Whoever calls himself Muslim, count him/her for me as a Muslim.”
Love and Peace, please.
Salam my former muslim neghbour. You say it because you need them to show real islam is like them. but I showed that they did against Islam. You can think that they are muslims, but is is true? of course not.
**
It is appeal to number fallacy. Sunnis are more but it does not mean that they are real muslims.**
If you realy want understand the shiah view these links:
al-islam.org
shiatc.org
shiamultimedia.com
valiasr-aj.com
OT - I feel since you are new here and only with 22 posts, to call members on this forum “darling” is downright rude! And it’s not only this post you used that word!Hi Edwin. **darling **in that book you can see enough reasons for this fack that vahabism is not the real Islam. If you have any answer for that please say it to me. Our sunni brothers have many books about vahabism like this or this but they are in Arabic.
I think I’ve answered before. What thay done before and do today is against Quran and that verse shows that they are against Quran.
Refrain from using the word “darling” when addressing me.Misinterpretation fallacy. No darling. my text does not mean that!