The Truth about the Mormons from a Devout Mormon

  • Thread starter Thread starter BYU-BOY
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
mormon fool:
<>]

This is unsupported speculation.
“Exaltation is eternal life, the kind of life that God lives. He lives in great glory. He is perfect. He possesses all knowledge and all wisdom. He is the father of spirit children. . .we will live in the highest degree of the celestial kingdom of heaven. We will become exalted, just like our Heavenly Father. . .(see D&C 14:7).”

"The Blessings of Exaltation:
  1. They will become gods.
  2. They will have their righteous family members with them and will be able to have spirit children also. These spirit children will have the same relationship to them as we do to our Heavenly Father. . .
  3. They will have everything that our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ have, all power, glory, dominion, and knowledge."
“When you climb up a ladder you must begin at the bottom . . .and go on until you learn all the principles of exaltation. . . This is the way our Heavenly Father became a God . . . he was once a man like us . . .God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ himself did” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp.345-46)."

From Gospel Principles, official publication of the LDS Church, 1988, p. 289-293.

The point of husbands and wives being “sealed” in the Mormon temple is so they can be together in the celestial kingdom. All of a man’s plural wives will become his goddesses when he becomes a god and will bear his spirit children without number – enough to populate his own planet. (He’s just like that other god – Heavenly Father . . .)

As was stated in my previous post:
Since [polygamy is] required for “exaltation,” what is forbidden on earth is now practiced in the Mormon heaven. See Paul DuPre’s post at forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=24862&highlight=mormon+polygamy
<<Polygyny was illegal when Joseph Smith started it in 1839 and it’s still illegal today.>>

I would say Joseph Smith started it into 1833 or 1835, when he was sealed to Fanny Alger. But he really didn’t start it, becuase it was obviously practiced in ancient times. Joseph was not in violation of any bigamy laws, to be so he would have had to have been legally married to more than one wife.
Joseph Smith called what he was doing all with these women “marriage,” whether it was legal or not.
<<The Mormons moved to Utah so they could continue practicing “the principle” >>

This was not the only reason they moved to Utah. Persecution by mobs was another criteria.
The mobs were enraged because Mormons were practicing polygyny. They objected to those plural wives.
<>

This portrayal makes it seem that the mormons easily gave up on the practice. More than just the statehood carrot affected the decision to quit the practice. The Edmonds-Tucker act disenfranchised the LDS church: sacred buildings were being confiscated, members not allowed vote, and husbands lived as fugitives. The LDS held out for decades against persecution while waiting on courts to rule on Constitutionality of the Tucker Act. The 1890 revelation showed that the church would not survive if they did not cease the non-essential practice.
Joe Smith certainly didn’t sell the doctrine as “non-essential” to his followers. And he told Emma (in “scripture”) that God would destroy her if she didn’t accept his other wives. How many? No one is absolutely certain – perhaps as many as 65. Here’s one researcher’s list:

xmission.com/~plporter/lds/jswives/jswives.htm
<<Joseph Smith himself practiced polygyny (one husband, two or more wives) and polyandry (one wife, two or more husbands), since several of his many wives had living husbands.>>

He should be commended for practicing such an unpleasant and faith challenging principle, solely because of his desire to follow a commandment.
Well, Mormon Fool, that’s an interesting way to look at it.😛
It’s also possible (and much more probable), as some historians have speculated, that Smith had a passion for women and justified his lust by having “revelations” to make his inclinations acceptable to his followers. The philandering came first, followed by the “revelations,” then the principle of “plural marriage” continued openly. He obviously did not find it “unpleasant.”

I’m sorry you are leaving us.
 
Okay here is my next question. Since I am moving away from the whole being a god in my next life idea. What do catholics believe we are going to be doing in the next life???

I’ve decided that I can be content with what ever it is but my studies to this point have not really given me a clear picture about what a catholic expects when they leave this time of existance. If you could also provide sources for your opinions that would be great as I don’t want to get led astray anymore.
 
40.png
Jodi:
Okay here is my next question. Since I am moving away from the whole being a god in my next life idea. What do catholics believe we are going to be doing in the next life???

I’ve decided that I can be content with what ever it is but my studies to this point have not really given me a clear picture about what a catholic expects when they leave this time of existance. If you could also provide sources for your opinions that would be great as I don’t want to get led astray anymore.
I believe that we will spend the next life glorifying and praising God in communion with all the faithful. Sorry, this is not a very theological explanation. I will try to do some more research and get a better answer to you.
 
Thank you for the discussion, however, this thread has gone way off topic and consists of several different issues. Please start a new thread or do a search for one already existing for the individual issues included here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top