B
bones_IV
Guest
Someone I talk said that the Vatican is a dictatorship. I was beside myself!
…except on earth the Pope gets to define what the King says (at least according to Catholics). In practice an absolute monarchy can be pretty close to a dictatorship.It is not a dictatorship, it is a Kingdom…With Jesus Christ as the loving, benevolent King. The Pope is but the Chancellor and has no authority other than what the King gives him.
Truth is not determined by a majority vote.…except on earth the Pope gets to define what the King says (at least according to Catholics). In practice an absolute monarchy can be pretty close to a dictatorship.
Jesus Christ the King, is ruler of our Church. This is absolute monarch as Jesus as King. The Pope is his steward. If you want to accuse the Vatican as dictatorship, you might as well call Jesus a dictator.…except on earth the Pope gets to define what the King says (at least according to Catholics). In practice an absolute monarchy can be pretty close to a dictatorship.
Who said it was?Truth is not determined by a majority vote.
You did, implicitly, in your the pope is a dictator comment.Who said it was?
Actually I didn’t say ***that ***either. What I did say is set forth below:You did, implicitly, in your the pope is a dictator comment.
…except on earth the Pope gets to define what the King says (at least according to Catholics). In practice an absolute monarchy can be pretty close to a dictatorship.
You implied that by your statement that a monarchy is close to a dictatorship.Who said it was?
If one looks up canon law as to the power of the popes, one finds he has the same rights as a dictator.You implied that by your statement that a monarchy is close to a dictatorship.
The implication of your statement is that one of two systems are prefereable to the model of the Catholic Church. Theological anarchy where everyone interprets the Bible on their own. Or that somehow some type of democracy is the way to go.
We can see from the Old Testament that the Lord never established either of these systems of governance, either in the civil affairs of the Jews or in the organization of the Levitical priesthood.
In short, God never really made much a provision for voting on a large scale. And I think it is safe to assume that God does not generally anarchy and chaos.
Thus there is much precedent in the Old Testament for the structure of the Church.
Finally your statement “The Pope gets to define what the King says…” is also not accurate. The Pope cannot **define **this. He can only teach it. There are many things that some in the Church would like to see done. For example, the ordination of women priests. However it has been determined that the Church does not have authority to change this because it is part of the deposit of faith. The Pope just cannot make stuff up.
It’s amazing how much you are able to read into a simple statement.You implied that by your statement that a monarchy is close to a dictatorship.
The implication of your statement is that one of two systems are prefereable to the model of the Catholic Church. Theological anarchy where everyone interprets the Bible on their own. Or that somehow some type of democracy is the way to go.
We can see from the Old Testament that the Lord never established either of these systems of governance, either in the civil affairs of the Jews or in the organization of the Levitical priesthood.
In short, God never really made much a provision for voting on a large scale. And I think it is safe to assume that God does not generally anarchy and chaos.
Thus there is much precedent in the Old Testament for the structure of the Church.
Finally your statement “The Pope gets to define what the King says…” is also not accurate. The Pope cannot **define **this. He can only teach it. There are many things that some in the Church would like to see done. For example, the ordination of women priests. However it has been determined that the Church does not have authority to change this because it is part of the deposit of faith. The Pope just cannot make stuff up.
Well! If you are going to be that way! The only response I can give you is…It’s amazing how much you are able to read into a simple statement.
So, try to interpret this one–
![]()
![]()