The wages of (non)reproductive sin

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bubba_Switzler
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What is forgotten in discussions of resources is that human beings are the ultimate resource. Note that the greatest economic growth and the greatest standard of living is found in places within the highest population densities: New York City, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Taiwan, not Wallace Kansas or Holly, Colorado. When declining global fertility rates combine with rising national debt loads, economic stagnation follows.
This is is perhaps my greatest frustration. It is so obiously true but so seldom appreciated.

While Malthusians no longer hold the intellectual high ground, it is still very often the case that people are seen as a burden more than a value.

The Church should be the greatest advocate and voice for this view but I don’t think most clerics really understand this fact.
 
This is is perhaps my greatest frustration. It is so obiously true but so seldom appreciated.

While Malthusians no longer hold the intellectual high ground, it is still very often the case that people are seen as a burden more than a value.

The Church should be the greatest advocate and voice for this view but I don’t think most clerics really understand this fact.
I once said to my mother something like “Well, I guess I owe you about $30,000 for my upbringing.” (Living was cheaper in those days.) She didn’t get what I was talking about. Of course, even if I had repaid her for my upbringing, the point is that I expected to be productive enough over my lifetime to substantially exceed the cost of my upbringing. So do most people. Does anybody think they they will never be productive? If they do, then we need to change their outlook.
 
It would take a castraphy of immense proportions to recreate an agricultural society.
It could very well happen, given that modern society and population levels is entirely dependent on the use of nonrenewable fossil fuels. While I don’t believe cities will disappear, it is an entirely reasonable assumption to believe that the ratio between city dwellers and country dwellers will decrease as the energy to support the artificial city environment becomes less available.
 
It could very well happen, given that modern society and population levels is entirely dependent on the use of nonrenewable fossil fuels. While I don’t believe cities will disappear, it is an entirely reasonable assumption to believe that the ratio between city dwellers and country dwellers will decrease as the energy to support the artificial city environment becomes less available.
I don’t agree that the city environment of today is “artificial” but it is certainly possible that they could depopulate in an econonomic collapse. A lower ratio of city (including suburbs and exurbs) to rural (meaning, primarily, agriculture) will be a symptom of catastrophy, declining standards of living, poverty, despair, etc.
 
The interesting thing to think about is that contraception by itself doesn’t seem to impact total fertility rates very much all by itself. It is only when it is “backed up” by abortion on demand that total fertility is savaged.

Think about it. There have been over 50 million abortions in the USA since Roe. Contraception was available virtually free in nearly every drugstore and gas station during that entire period and yet without abortion, the population would be 17% higher!

Then look at Ireland where abortion is illegal in almost all cases. It is only very recently that Ireland dropped down to replacement rate, even though contraception is widely available there. What’s the difference between Ireland and most other European nations? Abortion is illegal (France has a similar TFR, but it is highly propped up by immigrants from muslim countries).

So I’m starting to think that it is the combination of contraception and legal abortion that produces the mindset that sex has no serious consequences. Contraception in aggregate doesn’t seem to work very well if one of the byproducts is over a million abortions a year, eh? It might work well in laboratory conditions, but it seems to have little to no population level effect in the absence of available abortions. Perhaps because so little sex occurs in laboratories? 😉
 
I once said to my mother something like “Well, I guess I owe you about $30,000 for my upbringing.” (Living was cheaper in those days.) She didn’t get what I was talking about. Of course, even if I had repaid her for my upbringing, the point is that I expected to be productive enough over my lifetime to substantially exceed the cost of my upbringing. So do most people. Does anybody think they they will never be productive? If they do, then we need to change their outlook.
There may be those who are incapable of being productive (severe physical or mental handicap) but most people can find some place even if it is bagging groceries. But the biggest loss is perhaps those who don’t even try or who settle for less than they could be. Most people settle without much thought.

Nowhere is this more obvious than those who choose to go childless.
 
So I’m starting to think that it is the combination of contraception and legal abortion that produces the mindset that sex has no serious consequences.
I concur. The Muslim world is a very prominent example of this phenomena; legal contraception with no abortion except in the most extreme circumstances.
 
I concur. The Muslim world is a very prominent example of this phenomena; legal contraception with no abortion except in the most extreme circumstances.
Hmm, maybe I’m wrong then. The muslim world has not been immune to the fertility decline. Iran is below replacement and Turkey has plummeted to right around it. Abortion is illegal there? I did not know that. Back to the puzzling board…
 
Hmm, maybe I’m wrong then.
Most westerners are unaware of this. Interestingly enough, what made me research this was the “contraception leads to abortion” idea that is repeatedly put forth on the forum. That’s when I quickly discovered this was not the case with the Muslim world, which isn’t some anecdote; it’s a huge example that demonstrates this is not always the case. It is my contention that contraception isn’t the issue per se. it is the lack of morals that is the underlying issue, and the Muslim example clearly indicates this is the case.
 
It is my contention that contraception isn’t the issue per se. it is the lack of morals that is the underlying issue, and the Muslim example clearly indicates this is the case.
Contraception started gaining “respectability” in the West a more than 50 years before abortion commonly became legal here. Don’t assume that because abortion is illegal in Islamic countries now it will always be so. Islam fundamentally bans alcohol, but everybody knows Saudis party like rock stars when they go abroad. No reason that they won’t learn to wink at abortion in time too. It will be interesting to see if that develops, or if the double whammy contraception and abortion have had on western TFR is a coincidence.
 
Contraception started gaining “respectability” in the West a more than 50 years before abortion commonly became legal here.
Remember that you are referring only to modern contraception and abortion. Contraception has verifiably existed since the time of Onan, and it is reasonable to assume that it existed before then. Abortion has also existed since time immemorial.
 
Remember that you are referring only to modern contraception and abortion. Contraception has verifiably existed since the time of Onan, and it is reasonable to assume that it existed before then. Abortion has also existed since time immemorial.
Fornication existed prior to the 1920’s too, but it wasn’t respectable anywhere. Certainly contraception has existed nearly forever. But christianity universally considered it an abomination until around the 1920’s when protestant groups caved one by one until by the late 30’s they mostly had switched sides. Roe didn’t happen until the early 70’s. Thus, you can’t say for sure that Islam will indefinately resist the worldly pressures to rationalize abortion. Islam suffers from the same protestant problem of lack of organized authority, so if the people largely WANT to be told abortion is OK, they will eventually go find imams who tell them it is OK.

So the jury is still rather out on the Islamic front. Personally, I suspect that as contraception takes firmer root in the Islamic world, the pressures to accept abortion will mount. We’ll see, I suppose.
 
So the jury is still rather out on the Islamic front. Personally, I suspect that as contraception takes firmer root in the Islamic world, the pressures to accept abortion will mount. We’ll see, I suppose.
I’m one to objectively observe facts and interpret them, not force them into any preconceived notion. As noted earlier, the reason I even researched this was because Catholics were asserting that contraception always leads to abortion. The fact is that modern contraception has existed for decades and the results have varied amongst various cultures. Contraception does not seem to be the cause, but rather the effect. Morals, or the lack thereof, are the common theme. The culture lacking religious morals aborts; the culture that does does not lack such morals does not abort (except in extreme circumstances).

Could things change? Of course. But I’m not going to make assertive statements about hypotheticals.
 
It’s commendable to differentiate between speculation/projection and empirical facts. But that doesn’t make it virtuous to pretend that major cultural changes don’t lead to OTHER cultural changes. Assuming that the status quo will always be so is not prudent or supported by historical observations. I’ll agree that one can’t say outcomes for sure until they’ve happened. I won’t agree that sin doesn’t beget more sin, because it does.
 
Last week, the New York Times ran a piece on the dire demographic problems facing Germany. The short version: Germans aren’t having enough kids, and as a result the economy is in trouble and there are all sorts of logistical problems—vacant buildings that need to be razed; houses that will never be sold, sewer systems which may not function properly because they’re too empty.
weeklystandard.com/blogs/ze-germans-aren-t-coming_749902.html
 
This thread has been dormant for a considerable period. With rare exceptions, reviving threads after a protracted period of inactivity is discouraged because:
  • the issues that spurred them are often no longer “hot” or current topics, explaining why thread activity ceased originally.
  • posters originally involved in the discussion are sometimes no longer active on the forum and, therefore, unavailable to reply to comments added to the thread.
Our experience suggests that, when a topic merits revival, it is best accomplished by initiating a new thread that draws on recent events and can be posted to contemporaneously. This eliminates the baggage of folks being frustrated by asking and not receiving responses to issues raised in early posts (because the new poster didn’t notice that the post he was responding to was made a long time ago).

Posters are very welcome to open a new thread on the subject or any other topic, as well as to actively participate in the myriad active threads in the fora.
**
Thank you to all those who have participated in this discussion. This thread is now closed. **
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top