The "Why are you still single?" quiz, sorta

  • Thread starter Thread starter chevalier
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t know, I think it relates. It’s just like any other skill, whether its conversation skill, listening skill, comforting-your-partner skill. A more enjoyable experience would be more unitive I would think.
I suppose so but I was talking about focus on technique, not about having or not having a good one! Being technical is not quite loving and exalting the importance of pleasure beyond it’s true place reduces the importance given to the more important things. This is not so much about people trying to learn technique but those making technical expectations of the other. Wet Blanket offline.
 
Wow- this is what happens when I take a weekend off. Happy New Year. Country singer- the fat girl you mentioned at Starbuck’s isn’t a date- she is a victim. She doesn’t know it yet but her spirit is being damaged. Better to be alone than be a victim. When we are comfortable with being alone God will provide our partner.
 
Well I did respond check to most of those…so apparently being an intelligent, confident, faithful woman makes you un-datable in many eyes…

A couple more

You want to travel…check
You want to have kids right away…check ( apparently scary to some)
That last one for some can be a really big one, I’d be careful in how you bring up that subject… First and formost poorly handled it can come off as desperation to get married and have kids, even well handled some guys still just feel overwhelmed.

It depends on the guy though, I’m not single anymore (getting married 6/18) but personally I want kids right away so that wouldn’t have been a problem for me lol. Our current plan is to hold off for 4ish years though, ah well. That said I did stay single for a great long while, I think it was a mix of things, including some extreme shyness I had (still on the shy side) and me looking for the wrong things in a singificant other.

Anyone finding them selves in this situation and fustrated, I’d say just hang in there. You’ll find that perfect someone when the time is right.
 
When will guys realize that plain girls are easy to date? If you give a plain/ugly girl attention, they will melt and do anything you ask. The hot ones have many suitors, and are picky, and are harder to please.
I like plain girls. The problem is that most plain girls seem to floating in their own orbit and I in mine, which I think is inevitable after frequent disappointment and/or rejection.

The reason why I’m single is precisely because I’ve been single for so long and have developed certain habits, routines, and an independence which I must admit I’m reluctant to give up even though I often find myself alone and lonely and wanting to love and be loved.

I’ve found myself frequenting Catholic Match more in the past week, though, than ever before. I’m generally turned off by dating sites, though. In all honesty, yes, I am unattracted to many of the girls who are interested in me, but this doesn’t mean that I’ve never found physically unattractive girls interesting. Far from it! I actually dated a girl once who had been involved in a horrible car accident years earlier and was still undergoing reconstructive surgery. It’s just that seeing a picture and brief “About Me” on Catholic Match tells me nothing about you, and I’m really not willing to subscribe for $80.00 or however much it is per month in order to learn. Not to mention that such introductions seemed forced and unnatural.

Thus, I remain single.
 
Better to be alone than be a victim. When we are comfortable with being alone God will provide our partner.
Sometimes being alone itself makes you a victim. And if anything, not wanting loneliness is a sign that God has meant someone for you and vice-versa. I mean if you’re all find and dandy by yourself all the time, why do you need companionship for?
 
Sometimes being alone itself makes you a victim. And if anything, not wanting loneliness is a sign that God has meant someone for you and vice-versa. I mean if you’re all find and dandy by yourself all the time, why do you need companionship for?
Well, I think this is going to be a highly psychological explanation against codependency so here goes- stop it Chev (lol). It says the “the two become one.” Not “two halves make a whole.” So therefore to become a whole person one must be able to have some form of independence and stand on their own two feet - especially in today’s society. Once that is achieved and one can look at their situation as I want a relationship to complement the wholeness I have not to make my life whole than one can have a healthy relationship and become one of the two instead of a 1/2 of the whole.
 
Once again, we visit this sensitive topic of marriage vs. single life.

In all seriousness, not all people, nor all Catholics, are suited for marriage.

Some of us are just better at being single, or lack a call to married life

I was one without any desire to marry, or to be a parent. To blunder into marriage would have been a great mistake.

Living happily single is much better than livng miserably married, in my opinion.

If some people are happier single and childfree, then they ought ignore critics of that lifestyle.

We live with the consequences of our decisions, both good and bad. It is shortsighted to grant others the power to make your decisions, because you are the one who must live with those consequences.
 
Some of us are just better at being single, or lack a call to married life

I was one without any desire to marry, or to be a parent. To blunder into marriage would have been a great mistake.

Living happily single is much better than livng miserably married, in my opinion.
While true, some of us wouldn’t even have a clue as to whether we would be more miserable married than single since it’s been so long since we’ve been in a relationship - much less one where the two people involved are operating from similar premises.

As I mentioned above, I’ve unfortunately become “comfortable” in my routines, but that doesn’t mean I would like to experience a true relationship and change those routines for what might be a brief respite.
 
While true, some of us wouldn’t even have a clue as to whether we would be more miserable married than single since it’s been so long since we’ve been in a relationship - much less one where the two people involved are operating from similar premises.

As I mentioned above, I’ve unfortunately become “comfortable” in my routines, but that doesn’t mean I would like to experience a true relationship and change those routines for what might be a brief respite.
I for one, know that I’m only really content in a relationship. I’ve been in enough serious ones to know that (I was engaged at one point until the man died). My life is one trying to get ready for marriage (even my degree is in education, very child based and flexible for a family). 🙂
 
I for one, know that I’m only really content in a relationship. I’ve been in enough serious ones to know that (I was engaged at one point until the man died). My life is one trying to get ready for marriage (even my degree is in education, very child based and flexible for a family). 🙂
And I, too, am trying to work on getting ready for marriage. I mean, I’m trying to take care of myself, trying to have money in the bank, trying to advance my career, trying to put money back for retirement. Not to mention my willingness to cook and clean! 😛 Of course, all of these things are good for me, single or married, but I’m not slacking.

I enjoy being single, yes, but if I don’t enjoy it then I’m miserable because I can’t land a relationship and haven’t been able to for years. I have to be independent and comfortably so because, again, if I’m not then I’d antagonize myself to death. Just because I’m single and have fallen into the routine of doing my own thing doesn’t mean I don’t want to be with someone and do alternate things with them. Heck, I’ll even go shopping with her if we get along in many other areas! 😛
 
And I, too, am trying to work on getting ready for marriage. I mean, I’m trying to take care of myself, trying to have money in the bank, trying to advance my career, trying to put money back for retirement. Not to mention my willingness to cook and clean! 😛 Of course, all of these things are good for me, single or married, but I’m not slacking.

I enjoy being single, yes, but if I don’t enjoy it then I’m miserable because I can’t land a relationship and haven’t been able to for years. I have to be independent and comfortably so because, again, if I’m not then I’d antagonize myself to death. Just because I’m single and have fallen into the routine of doing my own thing doesn’t mean I don’t want to be with someone and do alternate things with them. Heck, I’ll even go shopping with her if we get along in many other areas! 😛
Once I get my degree, I won’t have trouble earning a living. 😃 Going into Special Educations, every child with a problem is paying your paycheck. J/k. 😛 I wish I could be more independent, but I have such a need to nurture that my employees (I’m the team leader) get all the food they can eat. It’s sad really.
 
Well, I think this is going to be a highly psychological explanation against codependency so here goes- stop it Chev (lol). It says the “the two become one.” Not “two halves make a whole.” So therefore to become a whole person one must be able to have some form of independence and stand on their own two feet - especially in today’s society. Once that is achieved and one can look at their situation as I want a relationship to complement the wholeness I have not to make my life whole than one can have a healthy relationship and become one of the two instead of a 1/2 of the whole.
Okay, so let me see if I got this right (rattles head), are you saying that it’s better to be whole and want a relationship that complements your wholeness? Wouldn’t that just be a bit of an oxymoron? I mean if you’re whole, then you’re complete and you don’t need or want anything. You are content, basically. Why would you want something more?

Because you’re not really content. I mean I can understand the bit about independence. I could very well graduate and get myself a job, live normally, and make a good career on writing on the side. I’d be independent in the most basic sense. Still, is that it? Am I just going to stop there?

One of my favorite lines from the Pirates of the Caribbean series is: “What is it that you want most?”

I believe that when people feel empty, it’s when they realize they can’t obtain fulfillment by themselves. If they didn’t feel empty, why would they want something? “No man is an island” is what this sad loner always hears from his both his family and peers.
Once again, we visit this sensitive topic of marriage vs. single life.

In all seriousness, not all people, nor all Catholics, are suited for marriage.

Some of us are just better at being single, or lack a call to married life

I was one without any desire to marry, or to be a parent. To blunder into marriage would have been a great mistake.

Living happily single is much better than livng miserably married, in my opinion.

If some people are happier single and childfree, then they ought ignore critics of that lifestyle.

We live with the consequences of our decisions, both good and bad. It is shortsighted to grant others the power to make your decisions, because you are the one who must live with those consequences.
It can go the other way around you know. Fervent religious, mortified by the diminishing number in the priesthood, become desperate in pointing whatever single man they find in a direction they may not be destined for. They try to downplay any romantic longing in these, yet undecided, single youths in the hopes of leading them to the convent or the seminary.

I myself had an encounter on this site almost like that. The person kept telling me to drop my fantasies and devote myself to religious work. Apparently that person is unaware that asking me to do that is like asking Michael Bay to direct a children’s Christmas play. (By the way, I feel that I sympathize with you Country Singer in feeling that I’m not cut out for a religious life. The only difference though is while your imagination is “sensual” mine is eh, “cantankerous” meaning violent. You can say I’m like the Catholic-Asian version of Frank Miller. :rolleyes:)
 
Lost wanderer:
Sometimes being alone itself makes you a victim. And if anything, not wanting loneliness is a sign that God has meant someone for you and vice-versa. I mean if you’re all find and dandy by yourself all the time, why do you need companionship for?
There are different types of companionship – some one to do things in common with, someone to discuss ideas with, someone to talk with. A decision or desire not to get married doesn’t usually mean that we do not want and value family and friends.
40.png
Magickman:
In all seriousness, not all people, nor all Catholics, are suited for marriage.

Some of us are just better at being single, or lack a call to married life.

I was one without any desire to marry, or to be a parent. To blunder into marriage would have been a great mistake.

Living happily single is much better than living miserably married, in my opinion.

If some people are happier single and childfree, then they ought ignore critics of that lifestyle.

We live with the consequences of our decisions, both good and bad. It is shortsighted to grant others the power to make your decisions, because you are the one who must live with those consequences.
All I would add it marrying could result in other people (eg spouse/children) being unhappy.

I wouldn’t want to be married to me but I would happy to be my friend!
40.png
Epistemes:
While true, some of us wouldn’t even have a clue as to whether we would be more miserable married than single since it’s been so long since we’ve been in a relationship - much less one where the two people involved are operating from similar premises.
I get a clue from the length of time I can happily live in the same house as someone else (friend, relative) – up to four days is fine after than I am ready to go home.
Lost Wanderer:
Okay, so let me see if I got this right (rattles head), are you saying that it’s better to be whole and want a relationship that complements your wholeness? Wouldn’t that just be a bit of an oxymoron? I mean if you’re whole, then you’re complete and you don’t need or want anything. You are content, basically. Why would you want something more?
Just because someone has decided they are called to be single does not mean that we that we do not want other people on our lives or that we want to live as a hermit. Some may, I think more don’t.
 
Anyone ever see the movie “Shallow Hal”? These two average looking guys, who will only date gorgeous girls. And one of them dumps this girl becasue she has one toe longer than the other.
One of my guy friends is like this, he will only date pretty girls. And he whines that he can’t find a girl with good morals. He whines that there is no girls out there. I tried to set him up with someone, and he rejected her because she was a brunette. And he’s still single, I wonder why?
Omg! Nope, haven’t seen Shallow Hal…that would be interesting. Have you ever seen In the Company of Men? These two coworkers plan to both hit on a deaf girl and string her along both at the same time and then drop her at the same time to see what it would be like to crush her for the heck of it. (Supposedly to make themselves feel better for the way women have treated them). And they definitely succeed in crushing her. It was a strange movie…
 
Duh … like I was living in Afghanistan and on airplanes and in classes and in Iraq and in Somalia and other unmentionable places. NOT A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY TO DATE AND GET TO KNOW SOMEONE OR EVEN MEET SOMEONE. Especially if you’re Catholic.

“So, why aren’t you married? You’re being selfish.”

What part of the first paragraph did you not understand?
 
Duh … like I was living in Afghanistan and on airplanes and in classes and in Iraq and in Somalia and other unmentionable places. NOT A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY TO DATE AND GET TO KNOW SOMEONE OR EVEN MEET SOMEONE. Especially if you’re Catholic.

“So, why aren’t you married? You’re being selfish.”

What part of the first paragraph did you not understand?
I don’t get it - LOL :eek:
 
I for one, know that I’m only really content in a relationship. I’ve been in enough serious ones to know that (I was engaged at one point until the man died). My life is one trying to get ready for marriage (even my degree is in education, very child based and flexible for a family). 🙂
Hah! In a PM exchange with someone today it really occurred to me I would so love to be a father and help children grow, while trying to make the world a better place for everybody else in the process. Reading Tolkien’s letter to his son in one of “these threads” right here today morning doubtlessly must have contributed. Plus, I’ve always had this desire of love with a woman, though at the same time always with a very special woman. It almost never has occurred to me it be just about anyone. This at times has made me wonder whether I weren’t seeing things the romantic way instead of the marriage way, but in fact, I seem to see things the way they are seen by the personalist doctrine (and the new things I read about it seem very much to coincide with how I feel).

On the other hand, I really wouldn’t make a bad cardinal! And I’d probably feel home in the tribunal, darn, the Rota itself! 😛 Except I just can’t imagine forswearing a woman. And I mean “a woman” here, not “women”, because while I’ll attack the soulmate theory on an intellectual level, it’s not as easy emotionally. Same as on some days turning head after the wrong girl feels a bit like cheating on someone who isn’t there yet. Not cheating as much as getting off the track which will need time to get back on as a result.
 
I for one, know that I’m only really content in a relationship. I’ve been in enough serious ones to know that (I was engaged at one point until the man died). My life is one trying to get ready for marriage (even my degree is in education, very child based and flexible for a family). 🙂
I am not content only in a relationship per say…but it does seem to be where I am comfortable. And I obviously have the desire for it (cloister not for me…:). I also choose a career path that would allow me to be flexible enough to start a family, and allow me to prepare for marriage in many ways. I love my job as it is full of my interests, but I am so very restless sometimes knowing that this is not where I fully belong.
 
There are different types of companionship – some one to do things in common with, someone to discuss ideas with, someone to talk with. A decision or desire not to get married doesn’t usually mean that we do not want and value family and friends.
In the context of this thread, I believe I used the term companionship to mean a relationship beyond the Friend and Family Zone? :ehh:
Just because someone has decided they are called to be single does not mean that we that we do not want other people on our lives or that we want to live as a hermit. Some may, I think more don’t.
Where did I say being single means living like a hermit? If I said that, then I’d be mocking our priests wouldn’t I? :rolleyes: Furthermore, given my definition of companionship on this thread, I can’t say you got my point.
 
I am not content only in a relationship per say…but it does seem to be where I am comfortable. And I obviously have the desire for it (cloister not for me…:). I also choose a career path that would allow me to be flexible enough to start a family, and allow me to prepare for marriage in many ways. I love my job as it is full of my interests, **but I am so very restless sometimes knowing that this is not where I fully belong./**QUOTE]

I agree with the bolded part. I feel like I’m in limbo. Like I’m a car that’s in idle, and all I want to do is race. I’m listening to music, and a lyric of one song struck me “how many nights till I get life right?” I must be doing something wrong if all my friends are married and I’m not. :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top