Theologian Küng: Christianity Gets on Many People's Nerves

[Keikiolu]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
*If you don’t believe that Christianity, especially Christianity as practiced by Catholics, isn’t more in line with God’s wishes for us as practice and belief, then you’re simply not a Christian.

If you’re not a Christian, then you have no standing whatsoever in the area of commenting on “internal Christian matters”. Period.*

I disagree again. Everyone of every faith (including a Catholic like myself) has the right to comment and question.

Firstly, you’re no Catholic. That’s obvious. You may call yourself anything you like, but your words betray you.

Your “commentary” is noise, as it is statement based on misunderstanding.

Please do continue to comment, but you should be aware that you’re given no credibility whatsoever for your nonsense. The more you blither, the more we know about you, therefore the less influence you will have.

Keep it up…!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
Your analogy is self serving and not applicable. I would have, as a good Catholic, said that humans are humans and should be treated as humans.

EXACTLY! Now you are on to something. Good job! Why didn’t you say this in the first place for yourself rather than accusing me of being a feminist? As St. Paul wrote, “there is no male or female…we are all one in Christ”. Gender with regards to matters of religion and worship should not factor in at all.

You take Paul’s comment out of context,… like a typical protest-ant. You might look into some actual Catholic education (catechism) to rectify your obvious failings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
You don’t seem to be able to differentiate special cases of human relations, which is not surprising for a liberal (probable libertine) “fuzz-ball”.

Tut tut. Name calling again. How old are you? Four?

Which description of what I’ve heard you say don’t you like?

…most likely the “fuzz-ball” description.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
Then you do misunderstand Christianity, which is The Church’s “version”, in it’s fullest and truest example.

“Fullest”. I agree with you, but for different reasons! lol.

Your anti-Catholicism is showing. That’s a GOOD thing. I prefer it when the actively evil self-identify themselves.

Thanks again…!

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.

 

[Peregrino]

Keep it up…!

I will, thanks!

You take Paul’s comment out of context,… like a typical protest-ant. You might look into some actual Catholic education (catechism) to rectify your obvious failings.

You mean indoctrination don’t you? I think I will pass on a second helping, had enough the first time, thanks! Took me a while to shake it off.

Which description of what I’ve heard you say don’t you like?

…most likely the “fuzz-ball” description.

You aren’t very subtle are you?. Your post:

Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
You don’t seem to be able to differentiate special cases of human relations, which is not surprising for a liberal (probable libertine) “fuzz-ball”.

clearly refers to me personally (as well as your ant comment above), not the content of what I have said. Given that this is the third time, I probably I should refer your postings to a moderator. However, your own inability to argue a point or engage in critical dialogue without resorting to infantile name calling, is IMHO, punishment in itself.

 

[Keikiolu]

Quote:Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif *Keep it up…! *I will, thanks!

Cool…!!

Quote:Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif *You take Paul’s comment out of context,… like a typical protest-ant. You might look into some actual Catholic education (catechism) to rectify your obvious failings.*You mean indoctrination don’t you? I think I will pass on a second helping, had enough the first time, thanks! Took me a while to shake it off.

Angry ex-Catholic anti-Catholic, What a surprise…!!

…due, no doubt, to not being allowed to do everything you wanted to do as a child by the big evil Father, who abused you SO badly.

Typical.

Quote:Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif Which description of what I’ve heard you say don’t you like?

*…most likely the “fuzz-ball” description.*You aren’t very subtle are you?. Your post:

Quote:Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif **You don’t seem to be able to differentiate special cases of human relations, which is not surprising for a liberal (probable libertine) “fuzz-ball”.**clearly refers to me personally (as well as your ant comment above), not the content of what I have said.

My description of you as I percieve you, as a liberal, probable libertine, and a “fuzz-ball”, is my description of YOU as the author of what I’ve “heard” you say here.

What is your point? Do you feel I’m “attacking you”? I’m simply describing you. You have a problem with me describing you? Why?

Given that this is the third time, I probably I should refer your postings to a moderator. However, your own inability to argue a point or engage in critical dialogue without resorting to infantile name calling, is IMHO, punishment in itself.

You quite obviously haven’t read much of my “work”.

I find it very interesting that you feel JUSTIFIED in calling me “unable to argue”, “uncritical in dialogue” and "INFANTILE,…

…yet you won’t allow me the same right.

Typical Stalinist (aka leftist fascist).

Best to you…!

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.