Z
zerinus
Guest
OK, I have just replied to your post.
zerinus
OK, I have just replied to your post.
Personally, I think the more names you have for God the better. It is a reminder that God is much more than one can define with a name. I think this may be one of the reasons that muslims sometimes meditate on the 99 names of God.**Well these are what he calls himself, just attributes or names and almost 99 of them but none them is God Almighty himself. So you see we Muslims donāt make the descriptions God accept what he calls himself and instructed all believers to call him his names or attributes.
Moreover, most widely pronounced attributes of Allah in the Quran are Most compassionate and Most Merciful. these start with every Chapter of the Quran and every regular contact prayers (5 times a day of multiple repetitions).
itās that simple. **
****Well these are what he calls himself, just attributes or names and almost 99 of them but none them is God Almighty himself. **
Why would God instruct believers to call HIm by a name that is not His?So you see we Muslims donāt make the descriptions God accept what he calls himself and instructed all believers to call him his names or attributes.
So Allah is the Most Compassionate and the Most Compassionate is Allah. Is that what you mean? Sounds like you give Allah the names of His attributes.Moreover, most widely pronounced attributes of Allah in the Quran are Most compassionate and Most Merciful. these start with every Chapter of the Quran and every regular contact prayers (5 times a day of multiple repetitions).
**Yeah, it is. Iām glad to have helped you figger it out.itās that simple.
The way he said it kind of confusing:De Maria,
if i recall well, AbeOman does believe that the attributes and nature of God are equal in the sense that they belong only to God. God is all-hearer, nobosy else is all-hearer, hence the attribute is Godās nature.
I still donāt understand that statement.Code:Originally Posted by **AbeOman** [forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif](http://forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=2886434#post2886434) **Well these are what he calls himself, just attributes or names and almost 99 of them but none them is God Almighty himself. **
Iām glad you are sorry, because that has got to be one of the most ugliest prayers Iāve ever had the displeasure of reading.**ā¦I pray to the almighty that anyone who insults anyone these chosen men of God rots in hell and lives life-after a lives in wretched life on this earth.
Sorry praying to god for such a cruel prayer but this really upsets me so muchā¦and there is nothing in my power accepts prayers.![]()
**
It is very nice of you to apologize, but you didnāt derail the thread. Zerinus did in order to give attention to his blog.Sorry for derailing this thread earlier everyoneā¦
What is a little passion between friends?I got a bit heated, i apologize![]()
[Revelation 3:16](http://www.whereinthebible.org/index.php?bookId=73&chapterId=3&verseId=16&page=1#x)
But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, not hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth.
Oh, your the one that DOES keep up the good work!Keep up the good work.
Sincerely,
De Maria
**
God is one. That is the Catholic Teaching. God is also Triune. Three Divine Persons in one God. That is Catholic Teaching.
Sincerely,
De Maria**
Dear De Maria,
Somehow I feel quite uneasy when we use the term āPerson(s)ā when we talk about the Trinity. Your term Triune is better, I think. The term āPersonā actually comes from the term āPersonaā which is somehow translated into āPersonā. Persona literally means āmaskā which carry the meaning of how human perceive God, as He dwell among us. God the Father by His own nature cannot be out of his holiness condition. So, in order to dwell and being close to human (the sinners), He sent his word and his word became human, and we perceive such human as Jesus. So, Jesus can also be interpreted as āthe mask of Godā as God presents among us. In Greek, the single most correct word is āhypostasisā which means the presence of God as perceived by human senses. I got this from a theologist Karl Rahner.
The way he said it kind of confusing:
I still donāt understand that statement.
Sincerely,
De Maria