J
JohnVIII
Guest
For me it is the Roman Church too. There is a oneness in the EO, but that oneness is in their inter-communion. The true oneness for both EO & RC is the Roman Church. That is what it was before the split, and the split really does not have the power to create a new Church for that universal oneness. The only thing that makes Protestants non-churches is because most do not have bishops, but some do, those that do have bishops are churches.Sure. Jesus’ one established church is either one of the Eastern Orthodox Churches or the Catholic Church. For me, it’s the Catholic Church. What it logically can’t be is one of the Protestant Churches. At best, any one PC can claim to be the reformed church of Christ.
If you think I contradict what I said before what I don’t agree with is that it should have been set up the way it was with Rome as the center, but it was set up that way and the Eastern Churches are forever tied to Rome. I also think there were other Churches that were not part of this deal with Rome, but they have mostly been destroyed. I support the independence of Orthodox and Protestant, but this independence really should get the blessing of Rome so that it can be lawful. - Like that will ever happen!
That’s not what I would do, but I do feel that I should pray that God bless you in this virtuous endeavor!Our best bet is to locate the church guided by God, and put our trust in the interpretation of His church.
Once again, that’s not what I would do, but I do feel that I should pray that God bless you in this virtuous endeavor!If everyone faithfully deferred to the authority of the church founded by Jesus then division would cease to exist, as long as His church remained free of dissenters.