TySixtus:
Fair enough. I can see why you would think that I would support that, and in a way I do. It’s my fault for how I wrote it.
I do think that the universe could’ve popped into existence without a cause. QM certainly supports the theory of particles doing exactly that.
However, the universe contains the law of causality. Causality exists within it. It could be said that the universe does “cause” stuff to happen, inasmuch as everything that happens, happens in the universe. And by your reasoning, I am wrong and you are right.
Please accept my apologies, as I wasn’t clear enough when I wrote my original statement. And thanks for the effort you put into it.
Ty
No problem, Ty, thank you for trying to clarify and for being able to admit that dismissing the classic formulation of an “uncaused cause” out of hand may have been a bit hasty.
As to what, or Who, this uncaused cause is – this non-contingent being – well, that is for another discussion or perhaps for other posters in this thread to undertake.
I enjoyed our exchange, and I would like to commend to you a very good book called
Theology and Sanity by Frank J. Sheed.
Although the author himself states that “This book is being written not to prove the truths of Christianity to those who do not hold them, but to aid those who do hold them in their exploration”, I think that you may find it useful as a very clear and accurate explanation and exploration of the world-view of the Catholic. Since you enjoy debate, you will appreciate Sheed’s ability to lay out the explanations with elegance.
Since it is not written, however, as a book to
convince an atheist or non-Catholic, you may find it a refreshing and alternative view of the ideas we have been discussing.
I look forward to your continued participation on the forum here. Good luck and God Bless,
VC