R
ralphinal
Guest
So what do you call the pontificating you do towards Catholcs?I agree with Kung; I won’t give God a theology lesson when I stand before His judgment seat.
I only give theology lessons to Calvinists![]()
So what do you call the pontificating you do towards Catholcs?I agree with Kung; I won’t give God a theology lesson when I stand before His judgment seat.
I only give theology lessons to Calvinists![]()
But the chain of salvation is never broken in Romans 8. It seems we are making a distinction between the elect and non-elect. Would you agree that God will save only the elect. And those who apostate and die show themselves to be the non-elect?Not all who believe are predestined to eternal life; only those who endure to the end. This passage is about the elect. The non-elect may believe for a time. Calvinism states they never believed.
Pontificating…but don’t worry, it’s not infallibleSo what do you call the pontificating you do towards Catholcs?![]()
![]()
![]()
But the chain of salvation is never broken in Romans 8. It seems we are making a distinction between the elect and non-elect. Would you agree that God will save only the elect. And those who apostate and die show themselves to be the non-elect?
God will only save the elect, yes. The non-elect, however, may be justified for a time, through faith, but their faith will die.
I was on the Roman Road and took that detour at the fork on the road.I believe in biblical and Lutheran theology. I’m not going to worry whether that lines up with Roman Catholicism or not. My viewpoints do not revolve around being as non-Roman Catholic as possible. If they’re right about falling away from the faith, then kudos to them. You believing in the Trinity must mean you’re on the Roman road![]()
You should’ve made a right toward Wittenberg…those left’s take a hard turn to Geneva. It’s kind of a “limited” option hahaI was on the Roman Road and took that detour at the fork on the road.![]()
LOL…that’s okay because the Wittenberg and Geneva roads merge later on down that narrow road. Guess who’s in the center? And look who’s at the bottom?You should’ve made a right toward Wittenberg…those left’s take a hard turn to Geneva. It’s kind of a “limited” option haha
As evidence, but without the atonement?—not so.They will say the same, of course. But Catholics and Calvinists both look to their works as evidence they are saved. That is not looking at the atonement.
And they’re whitewashed tombs; they’re atheists.Plenty of atheists that go from being down in the dirt to cleaning up their act.
The atonement saves without faith? Eternally? How?Yes. Christ reconciled God with mankind. Faith in the news of reconciliation is the result of the atonement.
They certainly summon spirits, as the scripture states.I’ve read a few different commentaries on that one. Do you believe witches can summon the spirits of the dead?
Nothing they’re not already aware of. :tiphat:I only give theology lessons to Calvinists
I’m the wild boar on the top. I think the bottom guy with the nice smile is a follower of Luther.**Thank you for posting your portrait Reformed. I must say you have good teeth, very good. do you bite?
When are you going to answer Michel’s question?**
But is looking at the atonement enough to demonstrate election?As evidence, but without the atonement?—not so.
Yes.ISTM that it’s your opinion that only you can look to the atonement for salvation; is that correct?
True; and they can’t use it as evidence of anything. Switch that scenario to a reprobate who has deluded himself into thinking he is saved because he is outwardly performing good works. You can see, then, that works are no means of determining one’s standing with God.And they’re whitewashed tombs; they’re atheists.
The person must believe the message. The person’s believing has nothing to do with the grounds of their salvation. It is passive.The atonement saves without faith? Eternally? How?
That begs the question: Is looking at, or doing anything enough to demonstrate election, or any true belief if you don’t believe in election?But is looking at the atonement enough to demonstrate election?
Neither is a rigidly strict theology a determiner of one’s standing with God. At some point, the rubber of your theology must meet the road and be put to a practical test.True; and they can’t use it as evidence of anything. Switch that scenario to a reprobate who has deluded himself into thinking he is saved because he is outwardly performing good works. You can see, then, that works are no means of determining one’s standing with God.
OKThe person must believe the message. The person’s believing has nothing to do with the grounds of their salvation. It is passive.
Christ’s work is objectively true because the reality of God’s verdict takes place completely in the realm of God, entirely apart from man’s involvement. Man has nothing to do with it, and man’s subjective perception or opinion does not change it. There are two causes for man’s salvation: (1) the grace of God and (2) the merits of Jesus Christ. Neither of these two causes has anything to do with the participation of sinful human beings. Both causes exist completely in God’s sphere.
Perhaps I’m misunderstanding you, but what purpose does it serve if no one believes it?From the cross Jesus said “It is finished” (John 19:30). What is finished is his life of active obedience, his passion and suffering, all his work of bearing and atoning for the sin of the world. This truth of Jesus’ completed work stands as an objective truth, whether a human being believes it or not. There is nothing that any human being can do to change what happened outside Jerusalem nearly 2,000 years ago. No doubt or disbelief can change the fact that the lifeless Lord Jesus Christ came back to life on Easter Sunday and left behind an empty tomb. Jesus’ triumphal cry from the cross, “It is finished,” stands forever as the objective declaration that Christ’s work of salvation is complete.
No; Christ is the mirror of our election.That begs the question: Is looking at, or doing anything enough to demonstrate election?
Absolutely.Neither is a rigidly strict theology a determiner of one’s standing with God. At some point, the rubber of your theology must meet the road and be put to a practical test.
Demonstrating faith is natural to possessing faith. It is like water to a fish in that it is naturally done.How do you practically demonstrate faith in the atonement? Put the way you’ve been putting it, do you even need to demonstrate your faith?
What would be the point of entertaining such a hypothetical? Since God determines whom the elect are, it was part of the plan of redemption that someone would believe the message.Perhaps I’m misunderstanding you, but what purpose does it serve if no one believes it?
***The blind leading the blind!LOL…that’s okay because the Wittenberg and Geneva roads merge later on down that narrow road. Guess who’s in the center? And look who’s at the bottom?
http://www.americanvision.org/images/reformers.jpg
Cazayoux of course - remember that question you have been avoiding?I’m the wild boar on the top. I think the bottom guy with the nice smile is a follower of Luther.Who’s Michel? (just kidding)
Here is the uniform testimony of those infamous Protestant Reformers:***The blind leading the blind!***
We must do through whom?Those pesky conditionals and commands keep showing up…
The Whole Armor of God
Eph 6
Finally, **be strong **in the Lord and in the strength of his might. **Put on **the whole armor of God, that you *may *be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. Therefore **take up **the whole armor of God, that *you may be able *to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm. Stand therefore, **having fastened **on the belt of truth, **and having put **on the breastplate of righteousness, and, as shoes for your feet, **having put on **the readiness given by the gospel of peace. In all circumstances **take up **the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming darts of the evil one; and **take the **helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, **praying at all times **in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication. To that end keep alert with all perseverance, making supplication for all the saints, and also for me, that words *may *be given to me in opening my mouth boldly to proclaim the mystery of the gospel, for which I am an ambassador in chains, that I may declare it boldly, as I ought to speak.
The question, as is usually the case in our conversations, HOW do we put on the armor of God?
This passage explains what we must DO, and what is POSSIBLE (not guaranteed).
michel
The mirror?No; Christ is the mirror of our election.
But it’s only valid in those who have faith in the atonement, and not for those who must “look inward” or to their works for assurance of their standing with God?Demonstrating faith is natural to possessing faith. It is like water to a fish in that it is naturally done.
That’s why I said perhaps I’m misunderstanding.What would be the point of entertaining such a hypothetical? Since God determines whom the elect are, it was part of the plan of redemption that someone would believe the message.
Of course they’re not, but they are a valid means of assurance; Christ and the apostles cited objective and experiential (subjective) guidelines for assurance.The subjective (faith) aspect of salvation is not the grounds of our justification.