There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reformed
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, because Jesus commanded it. Is it strictly necessary for salvation? No. Ordinarily, however, yes.

It’s still a means of grace in the adult convert, too.
Sorry for all these questions. I’m trying to understand what Lutheranism believes in this matter and how Lutheran assurance is different from Calvinist assurance. What occurs when an adult is baptized?

God Bless,
Michael
 
Yes, because Jesus commanded it. Is it strictly necessary for salvation? No. Ordinarily, however, yes.

It’s still a means of grace in the adult convert, too.
Help…what do you mean? Maybe Martin Luther did not reform enough in his lifetime in his undestanding of salvaton by grace alone through faith alone? Are we saved before or after our obdience to be baptized in water?
 
:amen:

It is an error to think that just because God uses a means to impart His grace it is a meritorious work and that the gift that is received through those means is not really a gift. Take for example the following verse:

2 Timothy 1:6

6For this reason I remind you to fan into flame the gift of God, which is in you through the laying on of my hands.

The gift of God is in Timothy through the laying on of Paul’s hands. Does this mean that what Timothy received is not really a gift - even though it is described as such - because he utilized a means (“laying on of hands”) to receive it? Besides, baptismal regeneration was unanimoulsy upheld by all of the Church Fathers ( including Augustine), upheld in the Coucnil of Orange, and was the universal and historic teaching until challenged by John Calvin.

God Bless,
Michael
Amen, mikel.

Indeed, the statement that baptismal regeneration disqualifies salvation by grace alone through faith alone ignores that God ALWAYS works through means. He doesn’t drop faith out of the sky (along with Scripture, haha) and boom it hits you. God works through the things He has made to deliver redemption through His people.

The 500 pound elephant in the room here is the sacrifice of Christ itself. A means.
 
40.png
ralphinal:
I am not saying GIVE everyone eternal life, but offer everyone a chance. You were the one who mentioned hearing the Gospel and rejecting it, implying one can choose to have faith.
Everyone who hears the Gospel has the “chance” to respond to, and does in fact respond to the Gospel either negatively or positively.
40.png
ralphinal:
My own position. It seems like there are times that we just have to say “this is what I beleive” and go from there. It is when we question those things, trying to understand that which we cannot understand on this side of heaven, that we get into trouble.
What isn’t being understood, and by whom?
 
Sorry for all these questions. I’m trying to understand what Lutheranism believes in this matter and how Lutheran assurance is different from Calvinist assurance. What occurs when an adult is baptized?

God Bless,
Michael
Not a problem.

They receive the Holy Spirit and are sealed with forgiveness of sins and are brought into the visible and invisible Church. Granted, this happens too through faith. But God continually, throughout a Christian’s life uses their past Baptism, and the other sacraments and means of grace to strengthen the faith of the Christian and continually shower forgiveness upon them.
 
:confused: A person can be justified by delusional faith?

God bless,
Michael
Well, the delusional faith wouldn’t be an instrument of justification, but what if the delusioned person at some point had faith… they would be justified…and then fall away.
 
Help…what do you mean? Maybe Martin Luther did not reform enough in his lifetime in his undestanding of salvaton by grace alone through faith alone? Are we saved before or after our obdience to be baptized in water?
As an adult, before, when the person is given faith. We are, however, saved continually. You do realize Calvin referred to baptism as a means of grace, yes?
 
Everyone who hears the Gospel has the “chance” to respond to, and does in fact respond to the Gospel either negatively or positively.
Then everyone is given the gift of faith? Is that part of double predestination? What happens if someone who is not of the elect chooses to follow Christ with all of his being?
What isn’t being understood, and by whom?
Let me ask it this way: do you comprehend 100% of your faith? Can you fully understand everything about God and his plan for salvation and how you fit into it?
 
Are you saying that you have no relations to Abraham?
No, I am saying that we cannot mix and match the three different “rock” metaphors used in Scripture. Arguing “Peter can’t be the rock because God is the rock” makes no more sense than arguing “Abraham can’t be the rock because God is the rock.” They are three diverse “rock” metaphors. None is inconsistent with either of the others. God is the rock of our salvation, Peter is the rock on which the Church is built, Abraham is the rock from which the Jewish people were hewn. None of those conflict.
 
When Adam sinned, we all sinned (including Mary). Therefore, we are all born sinners in the hands of an angry God.
Adams sinned.
We bear punishment for that inherited sin, however, it is not a sin that we committed.

If all have sinned, would that include babies? or the mentally challenged?

michel
 
But isn’t delusional faith delusive?
Also, to refer back to the original context of this discussion:

Whether you can look at your own faith to determine whether you are saved. The deluded person may not, in actuality, be justified, from God’s perspective. We’re not, however, talking about God’s perspective…we’re talking about your. If the person is deluded then they think possess saving faith when in actuality they don’t. But if the person is deluded, how will they discern the difference between true and false faith?

That is why looking inward is not a sign of assurance.
 
Also, to refer back to the original context of this discussion:

Whether you can look at your own faith to determine whether you are saved. The deluded person may not, in actuality, be justified, from God’s perspective. We’re not, however, talking about God’s perspective…we’re talking about your. If the person is deluded then they think possess saving faith when in actuality they don’t. But if the person is deluded, how will they discern the difference between true and false faith?

That is why looking inward is not a sign of assurance.
It is the same with sin. I can justify any sin that I have ever commited, even to the point where it was GOOD for me to do it. We are all good at lying to ourselves about all kinds of things, and sin is one. Our standing with God in general is another.
 
Also, to refer back to the original context of this discussion:

Whether you can look at your own faith to determine whether you are saved. The deluded person may not, in actuality, be justified, from God’s perspective. We’re not, however, talking about God’s perspective…we’re talking about your. If the person is deluded then they think possess saving faith when in actuality they don’t. But if the person is deluded, how will they discern the difference between true and false faith?

That is why looking inward is not a sign of assurance.
Buy what if he was baptized in his delusion?
 
No, I am saying that we cannot mix and match the three different “rock” metaphors used in Scripture. Arguing “Peter can’t be the rock because God is the rock” makes no more sense than arguing “Abraham can’t be the rock because God is the rock.” They are three diverse “rock” metaphors. None is inconsistent with either of the others. God is the rock of our salvation, Peter is the rock on which the Church is built, Abraham is the rock from which the Jewish people were hewn. None of those conflict.
Really, the promise was made to the seed of Abraham. And the church is built on the testimony of Peter as Jesus as the Christ. Please consider Romans chapters 9, 10, and 11 in regards to the true Jew.

The Law and the Promise
Code:
15Brothers, let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case. 16The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say "and to seeds," meaning many people, but "and to your seed,"[g] meaning one person, who is Christ. 17What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise. 18For if the inheritance depends on the law, then it no longer depends on a promise; but God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise. 

19What, then, was the purpose of the law? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise referred had come. The law was put into effect through angels by a mediator. 20A mediator, however, does not represent just one party; but God is one. 

21Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law. 22But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe. 

23Before this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until faith should be revealed. 24So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ[h] that we might be justified by faith. 25Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.
Sons of God
26You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, 27for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. - Gal 3
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top