M
mkdl_v17
Guest
In Peter Kreeft’s article “Fourteen Questions About Heaven” catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0462.html:
Your thoughts?
2. Will we all be equal in heaven?
By God’s grace, no! How awful that would be – almost as awful as knowing everything. Having no heroes,[9] being unable to look up to anyone, would be Hell, not Heaven.
We modern egalitarians are tempted to the primal sin of pride in the opposite way from the ancients. The old, aristocratic form of pride was the desire to be better than others. The new, democratic form is the desire not to have anyone better than yourself.[10] It is just as spiritually deadly and does not even carry with it the false pleasure of gloating superiority. Flat, boring, repetitive sameness is simply not the structure of reality in a theistic universe,[11] either on earth or in Heaven. However, in Heaven, as on earth, each of us will be or do something no one else will be or do as well. No one will be superfluous.
If He had no use for all these differences, I do not see why He should have created more souls than one . . . . Your soul has a curious shape because it is a hollow made to fit a particular swelling in the infinite contours of the divine substance, or a key to unlock one of the doors in the house with many mansions . . . each of the redeemed shall forever know and praise some one aspect of the divine beauty better than any other creature can.[12]
God’s justice is not ours. It surprises ours in a double way. On the one hand, the one-hour workers receive the same pay as the all-day workers, in Christ’s parable.[13] “He has put down the mighty from their thrones, and exalted those of low degree; he has filled the hungry with good things and the rich he has sent empty away.”[14] “Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low.”[15] But on the other hand, to him who already has, more will be given, and “from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away”.[16] Human justice is outraged by both halves of Christ’s paradoxical justice.
Justice does not mean equality. In a poem, in the universe, in mathematics, in architecture – everywhere there is natural justice, justice means inequality, yin and yang, male and female, higher and lower, East and West, light and darkness, land and water. No flat, dull repetition but uniqueness. In human relationships too, justice does not mean equality, but treating equals equally and unequals unequally.[17] Is it just to treat a pig like a man? If so, it is also just to treat a man like a pig. One of the astonishing blind spots of modernity is its unquestioning fixation on equality.
Of course there are degrees of perfection in Heaven; it is quite the divine style. There are degrees of perfection in everything God created (though not in everything we create). Equality is a man-made legal fiction designed as a wall of defense against tyranny, a medicine against a disease.
"We must all be guarded by equal rights from one another’s greed, because we are fallen. just as we must all wear clothes for the same reason. But the naked body should be there underneath the clothes, ripening for the day when we shall need them no longer. Equality is not the deepest thing, you know. "
“I always thought that was just what it was. I thought it was in their souls that people were equal.”"You were mistaken … That is the last place where they are equal. Equality before the law, equality of incomes - that is all very well. Equality guards life; it doesn’t make it. It is medicine, not food . . . ""But surely in marriage . . . ?Why is there no jealousy in this hierarchical, aristocratic, nonegalitarian Heaven of authority and obedience? Because all are cells in the same body. The kidney does not rebel because it is not the eye.[19] jealousy is the principle of Hell. There is no Hell in Heaven.“Worse and worse . . . . Courtship knows nothing of it; nor does fruition . . . . It is not your fault. They never warned you. No one has ever told you that obedience - humility - is an erotic necessity.”[18]
Your thoughts?