They violated Gods word

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevin_5
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

kevin_5

Guest
They violated God’s word

They violated God’s Word ref- Divine Mercy sister Kowalska

God’s Word is Inviolate our Christian faith is based on his WORD
It cannot be misunderstood it cannot deviate from the truth. God is truth.

This is no longer a private revelation. The Church cannot say you can believe this revelation or not. God’s Word is not open for debate His Word Is Inviolate.
God’s Church on earth has put it’s seal upon God’s Word
GOD’S WORD cannot and most not be trifled with to do so is to commit blasphemy

I need an official response and answer to the question is God‘s word Inviolate.
Then contradict what I am saying

God’s word is inviolate .

From the very start her superiors had no trust in her vision . If her superiors had been spiritual they would have accepted her attempt no matter how poor her picture might have been. But it did not fit their earthly concept of (beauty, goodness) so they portrayed God in their own image.

Earthly hands violated Gods word to fit their own earthly vision of goodness their actions were blasphemous
These words are now as Holy Scripture. God’s Church on earth has placed it’s seal on them.

These word’s have been given to God’s Church on earth and accepted.
The Churches actions affirms this.
First apparition as recorded 22nd February 1931.
As she knelt Our Lord Spoke.

“ Paint a picture according to the vision you see” and with the inscription: “ Jesus I Trust in Thee”
I desire that this picture be venerated first in your chapel and then throughout the world.

A picture is now in God’s House on earth but it is not the picture commanded by God. It is an image made in mans own image. Blasphemy in God’s own house.
It bears the inscription “Jesus I Trust in Thee” God’s word taken from the revelation to Sister Kowalska. Now confirmed as Saint Faustina .
God’s word in God’s House is not open to debate His word is inviolate.

The first part of the vision is a Command from God directed at her and her only. Sister Kowalska to” paint a picture according to the vision you see.” Sister Kowalska. No one else can paint this picture. (no one else can see what she saw).

And with the inscription Jesus I Trust in thee.
This is open for any one in any land or language to inscribe.

The second part does not command but requests (desires) that this picture be venerated first in your chapel and then thought the world. We are given a choice treated as God’s friend’s not servants God trust’s us to do his will.
The picture she paint’s must be venerated and no other.

Her original attempt must become the picture on display.
The official picture on display is made in man’s own image it relates to earthly beauty (goodness) it pertains to the senses and is blasphemous.
The original picture to spiritual beauty (goodness) it pertains to humility.
“The pure (humble)in heart shall see God.

Satan was thrown out of heaven for disobeying God’s Word.
He wanted to make God in his own Image also

Every Kingdom divided against itself is laid waste
and house falls upon house.
The established church cannot condone this
Blasphemy in one of it’s houses

Paint a picture according to the vision you see”

God’s word is inviolate our Christian faith is based on his word. It cannot be misunderstood it cannot deviate from the truth. God is truth

Any one who alters the meaning deliberately commits Blasphemy
Quote: vision you see—Sister Faustina

The official picture is based on a lie it is Blasphemous

And must be removed.

You are correct it is a photocopy of the first page of a pamphlet issued by Our blessed Lady’s press Swansea SA5 D5.uk
This is the information given out in the Leeds dioceses to the laity to promote the cause for Beatification of sister Faustina from 1996-98. This pamphlet was still been used in England and Scotland in 2002.

Quite recently I found an article on the internet I was shocked to see that the format had been changed. The original information given to the laity “Paint a picture according to the vision you see“ Has now become Paint a Image according to the Pattern you see. This has given me the spur try again. My article is based on the original information given to the laity over a long period of time.

The point I am trying to make in my article is that the original picture should be venerated.
From the very start her superiors had no trust in her vision . If her superiors had been spiritual they would have accepted her attempt no matter how poor her picture might have been.
In her first vision Jesus instructed HER to “Paint a picture according to the vision you see.” God’s Word is in Inviolate. Her superior’s would have know this

( at first she tried to sketch it her self she was no artist and failed after many trials someone was found who could and did paint it)

but they could not accept God been portrayed in this manner so they portrayed ( made) God in their own image.
Earthly hands violated Gods word to fit their own vision of goodness their actions were blasphemous.

This article has developed into an article about spiritual corruption at the highest level.
Our Christian Theologians are supposed to have Theological virtues (those virtues that are infused into a man by a special grace of God.
God’s word is Inviolate
We have to ask the question where are they? How can this happen?
Where are the defender’s of the faith? the protectors of the flock.
This violation of the Word of God cannot go unanswered
No Christian can defend the indefensible
If our Theologian do not uphold this sacred belief the establish church would be lost
This group of Christians has on it’s main site page
The protector of the sons of light against the son’s of darkness
St Michael the Archangel
There is a war is raging within and without the church
If we do not hold tightly to are belief’s we put are souls at risk
Code: 
        Is God’s Word Inviolate

                   Yes or No
kevin
In Christ
 
There are different translations of the book. The Church has approved of the devotion to God’s Mercy. You cannot say someone who paints Jesus differently is blasphemious. Read up on the devotion to the Divine Mercy here: ewtn.com/Devotionals/mercy/index.htm
 
Even though this is fully approved by the Church and Sr. Faustina has been canonized, it is still private revelation. Private revelation is subject to variations of interpretation. Even the most honorable private revelation is not the Word of God.
 
James.S. Saint.
  1. The vision and God’s Word were given to Sister Kowalska and not to myself’
    This vision and command to sister Kowalska to paint a picture according to the vision she saw have been accepted by God’s Church on earth and now belong to God’s people on earth.
Your quote.

Clarify and verify the incentive towards grater momentum of pure harmony of the living.
( That which remains in harmony cannot perish)

You have asked me to clarify and verify the above quote. I am a lay catholic I learnt my catechism by rote Leaving school at fifteen with a very basic education I have listened to the Gospel’s and sermon’s at mass over many years I can only give you my understanding of what God’s Word means to myself from these teachings and reflections.

I base all my arguments on these basic beliefs
God is Love/Truth his Word is Holy it is all powerful cannot err nor be misunderstood it cannot be questioned it is untouchable cannot be altered or trifled with it is inviolate
Sin is any thing We covet in preference to the Love of God.
Jesus was God on earth and is God now in Heaven
The Holy Spirit blows on the divine spark in our hearts to enlighten us and encourage us to search for truth. He is truth and also God
The church on earth has been given God’s authority. What ever it binds on earth is bound in heaven etc.
God’s Church has put it seal upon Sister Kowalska revelations these revelation’s refer to God’s Word. The church cannot trifle with His Word. His Word is inviolate cannot be touched and is now inscribed on God’s Church on earth.

Perhaps you could clarify your qoute and also come to the point that you want to make in regards to my Question

Is God’s Word Inviolate ? Yes or No please answer

Kevin
In Christ
 
kevin_5 said:
Your quote.

Clarify and verify the incentive towards grater momentum of pure harmony of the living.
( That which remains in harmony cannot perish)
.
.
Is God’s Word Inviolate ? Yes or No please answer
Click to expand...
To “Clarify” in case there is a misunderstanding, that quote is a “signature” part of my posts. It was not specific to you, but shows with every post I make. 😉

For me to explain that quote would seriously detract from your OP I think, even though I would love to make the meaning of it very clear to any and all.

As to your “Yes or No” question, I do not believe in yes-or-no questions. Where there is 2 there is ALWAYS a third, that which is both or neither of the 2.

Such is the case with your question. Every “word” is an effort to communicate and communication requires that both the sender and receiver attempt to understand with purity exactly what was intended by the sender and what will be understood by the receiver.

Due to this reality, every word of any Scripture must be carefully examined and studied to ensure that it is being understood, not by common understanding, but by the real intention of the speaker.

I have found, through extensive effort, that the words of the Bible, for example, are not at all to be taken on face value if understanding is to be attained. Many preach to not even try, but merely accept your first impression and have faith in whatever you thought you read. That is how we got a very diverse Protestantism.

I can say “yes” that God’s word is truly and totally inviolate, but I cannot say that you truly understand any of God’s word.

You probably believe that “God’s word” is referring to a Scripture of some sort. You would already be in error of understanding.

You have a choice to make. Either you very deeply study the complexities of ancient language usage and conceptual and connotative intention in communications in order to truly understand the real intention of God and ancient Scriptures. Or you leave that up to the educated and rationally intelligent in that field and take their word for it (have faith in them).

Thus, as it is that you are not fully coherent to the understanding of even the word “word”, The answer to your yes-or-no question is “neither and both”.
 
Corki

Your quote.
Even though this is a fully approved by the church and Sr Faustina has been canonised a saint it is still a private revelation and subject to variations of interpretations.

God Word is not subjective it is either God’ Word or Not

These word’s have been given to God’s Church on earth and accepted.
The Churches actions affirms this.
First apparition as recorded 22nd February 1931.
As she knelt Our Lord Spoke.

“ Paint a picture according to the vision you see” and with the inscription: “ Jesus I Trust in Thee”
I desire that this picture be venerated first in your chapel and then throughout the world.

A picture is now in God’s House on earth but it is not the picture commanded by God. It is an image made in man’s own image. Blasphemy in God’s own house.
It bears the inscription “Jesus I Trust in Thee” God’s word taken from the revelation to Sister Kowalska. Now confirmed as Saint Faustina .God’s word in God’s House is not open to debate His word is inviolate.

Kevin

In Christ
 
Kevin,

That’s not the way private revelation works. The words of a seer are not equal to the Word of God, even if the apparitions are judged to be worthy of belief; even if the seer is canonized as a Saint.

The revelations were recorded in St. Faustina’s diary. Neither St. Faustina, nor her diary is infallible.
 
Corky

These word’s have been given to God’s Church on earth and accepted.
The Churches actions affirms this.
First apparition as recorded 22nd February 1931.
As she knelt Our Lord Spoke.

“ Paint a picture according to the vision you see” and with the inscription: “ Jesus I Trust in Thee”
I desire that this picture be venerated first in your chapel and then throughout the world.

After the first apparition earthly hands manipulated God’s Word to fit their own image of what God wanted.

Quote; The first vision repeated its self several times. Why?

These earthly hand could not accept what God was commanding and pursued there own interests (portraying God in their own image) their actions show that they were untrustworthy. Sister Kowalkska had only three years of very basic education and doubt must be placed on any information given after the first vision. God’s Word is Inviolate it is not open to be questioned it doe’s not contradict it’s self nor can it be misunderstood her superiors would have known this.

God’s Word cannot be trifled with.

Your quote

The words of a seer are not equal to the word of god.

Moses was Commanded by God to give the Ten Commandments to his people
And he did so we accept these commandments as the Word of God.

Sister Kowalkska was Commanded by God to paint a picture according to the vision she saw and requested that it be displayed within God’s house on earth with the inscription “Jesus I Trust in Thee”
Gods church on earth has given God’s Word from this vision to God’s people on earth.
The church has endorsed this Command given by God to sister Kowalski.
Gods Church has put it’s seal upon this Command these words are now written on the face of God’s Church on earth for all time.

“ Paint a picture according to the vision you see” and with the inscription: “ Jesus I Trust in Thee”
I desire that this picture be venerated first in your chapel and then throughout the world.

GOD’S WORD CANNOT BE TRIFLED WITH TO DO SO IS TO COMMIT BLAPHEMY.

kevin
In Christ
 
kevin_5 said:
They violated God’s word

They violated God’s Word ref- Divine Mercy sister Kowalska

God’s Word is Inviolate our Christian faith is based on his WORD
It cannot be misunderstood it cannot deviate from the truth. God is truth.

This is no longer a private revelation. The Church cannot say you can believe this revelation or not. God’s Word is not open for debate His Word Is Inviolate.
God’s Church on earth has put it’s seal upon God’s Word
GOD’S WORD cannot and most not be trifled with to do so is to commit blasphemy

I
Click to expand...
yes Sr Faustina’s diary and the divine Mercy devotion was, is and remains private revelation, the status now is simply that it is approved by the Church as being free from error and likely of divine origin. Now individuals, parishes and Catholic groups are permitted to read and benefit from the book and to practice the devotion. There is no document or proclamation anywhere that makes this devotion mandatory or that promotes her writings as public revelation. Public revelation ceased with the death of the last apostle and is transmitted and protected by the Church through sacred tradition and sacred scripture in her magesterial teaching office.

Private devotions and revelations, even when declared free from error and of likely supernatural origin, remain just that a revelation made to a small group of persons at a particular place and time, with relevance to those persons in that place and time. They may have relevance beyond that place and time because the message therein contains reminders of what has always been Church teaching in public revelation: repentance for sins, prayer, good works, reliance on God’s love and mercy etc. But NEVER has a private revelation been made the basis for a mandatory discipline or acceptance of belief on the part of all Catholics, and NEVER has it been incorporated into public revelation.

Catholics are always free to accept or reject any private revelation.

and in any case this is not a topic relevant to philosophy but to spirituality and as usual we are on the wrong forum
 
James St John.

Your Quote
Either you very deeply study the complexities of ancient language usage and conceptual and connotative intent. etc

99.99 % of the laity including myself in trust rely upon God’s Church to give us God’s Word through Holy scripture and the Gospel’s which have been translated form ancient text into many different modern languages and yourself with your considerable knowledge will have to refer to translations by others.
I have been taught that God’s Word is Inviolate

The Church has the keys to unlock or lock the interpretation of God’s Word and to give to God’s people on earth. But it cannot alter or violate God’s Word A full explanation has to be given with every new interpretation based on sound logic with the guidance from Holy Spirit to the Church/laity.

The church cannot and must not contradict God’s Word. His Word is Inviolate. To do so would undermine the authority of God’s Church on earth it’s authority stems from the fact that God’s Word is inviolate
If this Holy belief was transgressed The established church would be lost
The church bases it’s authority on the fact that God’s Word is inviolate.
The church cannot display God’s Word in God’s House and say it is a private revelation you can take it or leave it God’s Word cannot be trifled with His word is Inviolate

If God’s Word was not inviolate What would the Church base it authority on ?

A full official explanation needs to be given concerning God’s Word below to the laity.
God’s Word below cannot ever be altered His Word is inscribed on the face of the Church for all time.
These word’s have been given to God’s Church on earth and accepted.
The Churches actions affirms this.
First apparition as recorded 22nd February 1931.
As she knelt Our Lord Spoke.

“ Paint a picture according to the vision you see” and with the inscription: “ Jesus I Trust in Thee”
I desire that this picture be venerated first in your chapel and then throughout the world.

God’s Word In God’s House before God’s people is not open for debate God’s word is inviolate.

kevin
In Christ.
 
Puzzleannie

Your Quote.

Catholics are free to accept or reject private revelation.

Catholics presented with God’s Word endorsed by the Church In God’s House cannot accept or reject them.
They now belong to the laity and are no longer private.

God’s Word is Inviolate
These word’s have been given to God’s Church on earth and accepted.
The Churches actions affirms this.
First apparition as recorded 22nd February 1931.
As she knelt Our Lord Spoke.

“ Paint a picture according to the vision you see” and with the inscription: “ Jesus I Trust in Thee”
I desire that this picture be venerated first in your chapel and then throughout the world.

After the first apparition earthly hands manipulated God’s Word to fit their own image of what God wanted.

Quote; The first vision repeated its self several times. Why?

These earthly hands could not accept what God was commanding and pursued there own interests (portraying God in their own image) their actions show that they were untrustworthy. Sister Kowalkska had only three years of very basic education and doubt must be placed on any information given after the first vision. God’s Word is Inviolate it is not open to be questioned it doe’s not contradict it’s self nor can it be misunderstood her superiors would have known this.

God’s Word cannot be trifled with

Moses was Commanded by God to give the Ten Commandments to his people
And he did so. We accept these commandments as the Word of God.

Sister Kowalkska was Commanded by God to paint a picture according to the vision she saw and requested that it be displayed within God’s house on earth with the inscription “Jesus I Trust in Thee”
Gods church on earth has given God’s Word from this vision to God’s people on earth.
The church has endorsed this Command given by God to sister Kowalski.
Gods Church has put it’s seal upon this Command these words are now written on the face of God’s Church on earth for all time.

“ Paint a picture according to the vision you see” and with the inscription: “ Jesus I Trust in Thee”
I desire that this picture be venerated first in your chapel and then throughout the world.

GOD’S WORD CANNOT BE TRIFLED WITH TO DO SO IS TO COMMIT BLAPHEMY.

kevin
In Christ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top