Thomas Dewesslow

[cjforJesus]

As I was browsing some videos on youtube I was drawn to a particular one concerning an art historian and his analysis of the shroud of Turin.

This man claims he can prove the image was formed by a decomposing body and that the resurrection was just symbolic! After he said that I promptly discontinued viewing it.

Has anyone heard of this man,Thomas Dewesslow? I had never heard that anyone thought the image was caused by decomposition.From what i recall the STURP team officially declared it was a scorch caused by a huge burst of energy.

Just thought I would warn anyone who studies the shroud that they might run into articles by this former catholic.

 

[dshix]

As I was browsing some videos on youtube I was drawn to a particular one concerning an art historian and his analysis of the shroud of Turin.

This man claims he can prove the image was formed by a decomposing body and that the resurrection was just symbolic! After he said that I promptly discontinued viewing it.

Has anyone heard of this man,Thomas Dewesslow? I had never heard that anyone thought the image was caused by decomposition.From what i recall the STURP team officially declared it was a scorch caused by a huge burst of energy.

Just thought I would warn anyone who studies the shroud that they might run into articles by this former catholic.

No, I’ve never heard of him, nor do I care to. Nor do I think he’ll be remembered in about 20 years.

How, exactly, can a resurrection be symbolic? How do you *symbolically *resurrect??

Ludicrous I tell you.

 

[opus101]

If the image was formed by a decomposing body (and it wasn’t), then it isn’t the Holy Shroud. If it was formed by a decomposing body, then how does he think he knows it was Christ’s, since then it could be anybody’s. And if it was just anybody’s, why has this particular one maintained an image while others have not?