Those Persistent Stoics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr_Ley
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Dr_Ley

Guest
Those Persistent Stoics

Stoicism was born in a world falling apart. Invented in Athens just a few decades after Alexander the Great’s conquests and premature death upended the Greek world, Stoicism took off because it offered security and peace in a time of warfare and crisis. The Stoic creed didn’t promise material security or a peace in the afterlife; but it did promise an unshakable happiness in this life.

Stoicism tells us that no happiness can be secure if it’s rooted in changeable, destructible things. Our bank accounts can grow or shrink, our careers can prosper or falter, even our loved ones can be taken from us. There is only one place the world can’t touch: our inner selves, our choice at every moment to be brave, to be reasonable, to be good.
The world might take everything from us; Stoicism tells us that we all have a fortress on the inside. The Stoic philosopher Epictetus, who was born a slave and crippled at a young age, wrote: “Where is the good? In the will…If anyone is unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone.”
While it’s natural to cry out at pain, the Stoic works to stay indifferent to everything that happens on the outside, to stay equally happy in times of triumph and disaster. It’s a demanding way of life, but the reward it offers is freedom from passion – freedom from the emotions that so often seem to control us, when we should control them. A real Stoic isn’t unfeeling. But he or she does have a mastery of emotions, because Stoicism recognizes that fear or greed or grief only enter our minds when we willingly let them in.
A teaching like that seems designed for a world on edge, whether it’s the chaotic world of ancient Greece, or a modern financial crisis. But then, Epictetus would say that – as long as we try to place our happiness in perishable things – our worlds are always on edge.
 
Those Persistent Stoics

Stoicism was born in a world falling apart. Invented in Athens just a few decades after Alexander the Great’s conquests and premature death upended the Greek world, Stoicism took off because it offered security and peace in a time of warfare and crisis. The Stoic creed didn’t promise material security or a peace in the afterlife; but it did promise an unshakable happiness in this life.

Stoicism tells us that no happiness can be secure if it’s rooted in changeable, destructible things. Our bank accounts can grow or shrink, our careers can prosper or falter, even our loved ones can be taken from us. There is only one place the world can’t touch: our inner selves, our choice at every moment to be brave, to be reasonable, to be good.
The world might take everything from us; Stoicism tells us that we all have a fortress on the inside. The Stoic philosopher Epictetus, who was born a slave and crippled at a young age, wrote: “Where is the good? In the will…If anyone is unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone.”
While it’s natural to cry out at pain, the Stoic works to stay indifferent to everything that happens on the outside, to stay equally happy in times of triumph and disaster. It’s a demanding way of life, but the reward it offers is freedom from passion – freedom from the emotions that so often seem to control us, when we should control them. A real Stoic isn’t unfeeling. But he or she does have a mastery of emotions, because Stoicism recognizes that fear or greed or grief only enter our minds when we willingly let them in.
A teaching like that seems designed for a world on edge, whether it’s the chaotic world of ancient Greece, or a modern financial crisis. But then, Epictetus would say that – as long as we try to place our happiness in perishable things – our worlds are always on edge.
Sounds a lot like what Scientology claims to be about.
 
In what way? If anything, stoicism seems more like Christianity.
Scientology claims to be about bringing out the betterment of one’s self. To try and bring someone to their fullest potential while giving up on material things (like money, lots of money) to attempt to make one fully happy, to the exclusion of God (despite what they claim). And that the only truth and good is found within one’s self. I’m not saying it is a perfect match, but it does sound like the claims made by Scientology, or at least the people outside with those “stress tests”.

In a way, it also somewhat reflects Buddhism, and yes to some extent Christianity. Christianity, however, tells us that truth and goodness come from God, not ourselves.
 
The Stoics were the epitome of humanism and atheism, well mixed and blended with a mirror-like exterior that indeed reflected Christian principles. However, they merely reflected some Christian ideals, but did not follow them or promote anything like Christianity. The stoics were anti-Christian and only cared about what they could get from this world. Initially, to the new prospects, it sounded wonderful and seemed to offer the answers they were seeking. In essence it was a movement developed in the minds of men to pacify the masses while simultaneously injecting apathy and complacency. Pleasure and personal gain became the focus as one got deeper and deeper into the crafty theology. All that was wrong in their lives and with the world around them was gradually replaced by personal desire. Additionally the new converts were taught to believe that the answer to many issues lay within them. If they were unhappy it was because they failed to find the happiness that was inside them all along. That is one of many reasons Stoicism is listed as a cult and /or false religion. In some ways this type of outlook was exemplified in the 60’s here in the US. Unfortunately in some academic circles this has become most appealing and indeed influences teaching methods and content of lessons presented. I found this to be most true in our institutions that profess Christian ethics and foundation. I say this in respect to my experiences in schools and universities around the world. I have only attended or been associated with 37 schools since 1977. But then what else would one expect in a secular society that is increasingly affecting Christianity from without and within.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top