S
Servant19
Guest
LOLI’m scared of Eric
Regards Tony
It’s a good thing!
I pray for Eric every day. He has probably the hardest job on the planet in here. All in all he does an exemplary job!
.
LOLI’m scared of Eric
Regards Tony
So, what the Christians call the ‘Bible’, you consider as a story book resource for spiritual insight?Dear Kaninchen,
The Baha’i Faith has no problems in believing the historicity of the Bible, but stresses the need to understand that the purpose of the Bible is not for its historical value, but for it’s spiritual value.
Every word, every teaching, every parable has spiritual application in our lives, and gives us a direction on “what we should DO” in order to be in righteous relationship with G-d.
I think the value of the NT over the OT lies in it’s emphasis in seeing the “spirit” behind our actions, and how that can impact our soul and thereby our drawing us nearer to our Lord.
I didn’t quite say that, dear sisterSo, what the Christians call the ‘Bible’, you consider as a story book resource for spiritual insight?
And that’s why new religions are born dear Kaninchen.By the way, I think the ‘spiritual’ side of the religious ‘garden’ can be the part full of the most vibrant colour and glorious blooms - the trouble is that, unless you are diligent with the hoe, it soon gets infested with weeds.
Sometimes one has to ask a question in several ways before one gets clearer answers - we’re a religion of Law, Servant19, it tends to make us all lawyers in one way or another.I didn’t quite say that, dear sister![]()
Predictably, that’s where the ‘house of cards’ I was talking about falls down.I said it’s likely to be all true and an actual rebelling of historical events. But the purpose behind the Apostles writing it down for us all to read today holds “more” spiritual value than historical value, from a Baha’i perspective.
Looking at the world today, wouldn’t you say it’s in need of a good hoe?![]()
Of course you do, I rarely write ‘throwaway lines’, by the way. There’s usually a purpose to it.Baha’is believe we are doing the hoeing, through the power invested in us by the Holy Spirit.
That is what Baha’u’llah has brought back to the Religious Table.By the way, I think the ‘spiritual’ side of the religious ‘garden’ can be the part full of the most vibrant colour and glorious blooms - the trouble is that, unless you are diligent with the hoe, it soon gets infested with weeds.
Oh, orthopraxy is a grand thing, Tony, living in a religion of Law means you’re continually being reminded of what you’re doing and why you’re doing it.That is what Baha’u’llah has brought back to the Religious Table.
Worship is not accepted unless it results in deeds. Baha’u’llah has raised work to the level of Worship. If one undertakes His/Her occupation in the spirit of service to humanity, we can now spend the day in the prayer of work.
Regards Tony
We pray each day to keep God Unconstrained that we find our God Standing within with Laws.Oh, orthopraxy is a grand thing, Tony, living in a religion of Law means you’re continually being reminded of what you’re doing and why you’re doing it.
There’s nothing like a good argument though - which isn’t really terribly self-subduing as an activity.We pray each day to keep God Unconstrained that we find our God Standing within with Laws.
Life is living Gods Laws by subduing self.
Well, I have to say that I rather enjoy these sorts of threads - in asort of way.
![]()
That’s very…helpful.
MJ
For a Jew it’s a little like ‘taste of their own medicine time’.![]()
And I yours or any one, as it is God that Gives to who so ever He chooses.There’s nothing like a good argument though - which isn’t really terribly self-subduing as an activity.
By the way, remember that we Jews don’t believe that people are, in some way, disadvantaged in God’s eyes for not believing as we do. I have no reason, nor desire, to change your mind about what you believe.
In that lays the progression of Religion.
I think the Baha’i:Christian :: Christian:Jewish analogy is the only thing that has kept me at all interested in this thread.
Of course, with that in mind a Christian can always say to a Baha’i what a Jew can say to a Christian: “Uh, yeah, I realize that your religion incorporates our Bible. Why does that make you think I would be interested in your religion?” (or whatever variations on that wording)
![]()
As an outsider, I’d suggest that Christians tend to be very good at ‘intra-religious’ argument and, from time to time, in dealing with ‘non-believers’. Christians, however, have tended to have much less practice in ‘inter-religious’ argument where learning to see a religion through the eyes of its own believers is quite important if one is to avoid ‘talking at’ one another.
I think the Baha’i:Christian :: Christian:Jewish analogy is the only thing that has kept me at all interested in this thread.
Of course, with that in mind a Christian can always say to a Baha’i what a Jew can say to a Christian: “Uh, yeah, I realize that your religion incorporates our Bible. Why does that make you think I would be interested in your religion?” (or whatever variations on that wording)
![]()
We have given you plenty, but it is not enough.i have never been given one sound reason, from anyone, to believe that the bab and bahaullah were sent by almighty God.
Hi sister Kaninchen,Sometimes one has to ask a question in several ways before one gets clearer answers - we’re a religion of Law, Servant19, it tends to make us all lawyers in one way or another.
Predictably, that’s where the ‘house of cards’ I was talking about falls down.
Of course you do, I rarely write ‘throwaway lines’, by the way. There’s usually a purpose to it.
It’s been rather interesting talking to people who come from what might be described as the ‘other end’ of the monotheistic line.
Sorry, it was in a reply to Tony that I’d said:Hi sister Kaninchen,
Would you mind clarifying what exactly is this “house of cards” you mention?
That, of course, is a matter of perspective, I might have put it as the latest great interpreters of “what the Jews didn’t understand about God and stuff.”Also what do you mean the “other end” of the monotheistic line?
Mr Servant, maybe the answer is to not try so hard. If Bahaullah is indeed the ‘Return of the Christ’, the ‘Return of the Mahdi’, the ‘Glory of the Holy Spirit’, the ‘Glory of the Father’ or the ‘Father’ himself (I am not sure which), he will himself reach into our hearts and convince us of his authenticity. Your job maybe to just inform of us of about Bahaullah and leave the convincing to him.We have given you plenty, but it is not enough.
So let me ask you. What is it exactly that you are looking for??
What is the one “sound reason” that you want?
.
Of course you are right, but the miracle of Baha’u’llah will not take place in any heart if prejudice and ignorance about Him exists.Mr Servant, maybe the answer is to not try so hard. If Bahaullah is indeed the ‘Return of the Christ’, the ‘Return of the Mahdi’, the ‘Glory of the Holy Spirit’, the ‘Glory of the Father’ or the ‘Father’ himself (I am not sure which), he will himself reach into our hearts and convince us of his authenticity. Your job maybe to just inform of us of about Bahaullah and leave the convincing to him.
Soon in the less than a couple of years, the Mahdi as well as the Christ will return and then this may not be that important.
Did Moses talk about how He would establish the unification of the human race?Sorry, it was in a reply to Tony that I’d said:
I do tend to get a picture of a ‘house of cards’, with the Baha’i view of Christianity at the bottom then, on top of that, the Baha’i view of Islam as the next level and, on top, the Baha’i view of Baha’i.
Of course, you might add to a description of Judaism’s belief structure: “the Jewish view of Mesopotamian triple-goddess religion,” and you might well be right but it would be a theological whataboutery really.
That, of course, is a matter of perspective, I might have put it as the latest great interpreters of “what the Jews didn’t understand about God and stuff.”