M
mtr01
Guest
As sort of a follow-up to Tantum Ergo’s post, I don’t think a “funny internal feeling” is a valid way to assess one’s faith. Karl Keating addressed this issue quite well in a recent e-letter:I suppose the difference is in my expectations… and if expectations are not met, then there is disappointment, hence leading to self-doubt, that I am not chosen or called - that I’m just trying to find a way out of my guilt, shame, fear, add as many as make sense.
It has also been said that you get out of it what you put into it. So, one could say to me - Fiz - GO to church - QUIT worrying so much about what you might or might not feel and GO FIND OUT!
Ok, ok, so I already said that to myself. I do tend to analyze everything to pieces before moving on.
Anyone else get that pit in their stomach when it’s time to do something outside of your normal routine - especially considering spiritual matters??!!
Thanks!
=)
Fiz
MINDING THE MIND
In another book, the posthumously published and hard to find “Proving God,” Knox quotes someone who noted that “an unintellectual salvation means an unsaved intellect.” I like that construction.
When it comes to accepting their faith, some Catholics seem to act like Mormons. When Mormons come to your door, they give you a copy of the “Book of Mormon” and ask you to read it. They say you will receive assurance that it is “another testament of Jesus Christ,” and that assurance will come by way of what they call a “burning in the bosom.” Catholic apologist Arnold Lunn used to call this kind of thing “fif,” which stands for “funny internal feeling.” You will know the “Book of Mormon” is true because you will feel all aflutter inside.
**That’s the kind of test not a few Catholics give to their own faith. They know it is true because it makes them feel good. This is an abandonment of the use of the mind. Our faith objectively is true, but truth is known by the intellect, not the emotions. The emotions may motivate us to investigate the truth of something, but they cannot establish its truth. That is a task for the mind.
**
If our faith were proved by “fif,” then those saints who underwent a dark night of the soul–I have in mind such luminaries as John of the Cross and Teresa of Avila–could not be said to have accepted the faith as true. For substantial periods they had the opposite of a “burning in the bosom,” but they never chucked the faith because, despite the lack of emotional highs, they knew it to be true because their minds told them so.
In the end, I wouldn’t put too much stock in the “warm fuzzies”, or lack thereof.All Catholics need to remember that the virtue of faith has to do with the mind, not with the emotions. [emphasis mine]
catholic.com/newsletters/kke_041123.asp