V
VietCatholic83
Guest
I am curious as to how Traditional Catholics feel about the restoration of the Permanant Diaconate. Thanks and God bless 
For most traditional Catholics the stumbling block is the decision to allow deacons to be married. This seems to be an attack on celibacy.I am curious as to how Traditional Catholics feel about the restoration of the Permanant Diaconate. Thanks and God bless![]()
deacons are not allowed to marryFor most traditional Catholics the stumbling block is the decision to allow deacons to be married. This seems to be an attack on celibacy.
t.
For some others, the difficulties include:For most traditional Catholics the stumbling block is the decision to allow deacons to be married.
Actually, poverty and chastity are inherent in religious life.For most traditional Catholics the stumbling block is the decision to allow deacons to be married. This seems to be an attack on celibacy.
Celibacy is not inherent to the priesthood, and a deacon is not a priest, but in our present promiscuous culture, where it is taught that it is necessary to have a “relationship” to be a fulfilled human being, it is a very powerful symbol. Not as powerful as monasticism, however, to which poverty and celibacy are inherent.
Married priests are also not an attack on celibacy. The Eastern Catholic Churches have also preserved the tradition of a married secular clergy.deacons are not allowed to marry
married men may be ordained as deacons
since the practice is ancient and preserved in Eastern Christianity I cannot see a basis for an objection on that basis. Deacons are not priests, so it is not an attack on celibacy.
I might think it is a bad idea to have milk monitors at school.As a permanent deacon, married with 5 children and 13 grand-children, I can only say that I love my vocation and thank God for the opportunity to be of service to Him by serving his people.
God bless you! What a wonderful testimony!. Thank you for all your service to the Church and to God.As a permanent deacon, married with 5 children and 13 grand-children, I can only say that I love my vocation and thank God for the opportunity to be of service to Him by serving his people. I have been a deacon for 16 years. While we are clergy, we live married lives as normal Catholic husbands and are called to be examples of what married families should be. I am not so naive as to say that we all succeed, as we are human just as everyone else. We say the divine office daily, (morning and evening prayers) and are called to a life of prayer. My wife and I pray daily and would encourage everyone to do so. My biggest privileges were to witness the weddings of my children and to baptize my grand-children. Whenever we see someone come back to the church because of God using us, it is profoundly humbling. I know that this vocation is not for all men, but would encourage them to consider how to best serve God in their lives. Our wives had to give permission for us to be ordained and we (deacons) vow that if we become widowers, we will not remarry. We do so, with a solemn trust that God will not give us anything that, with his grace, we cannot endure. After these 16 years, I can only look back and wonder why God has chosen one so unworthy to give such great blessings. Please pray for us.
God Bless
Deacon Ed B
Personally I say it’s time we drop the Celibacy requirement for Priests and just leave it at the Bishop level and above. Seriously it’s a discipline not a doctrine.On one hand, the diaconate is a valid step of Holy Orders. Some people may be called to part of it, but not to all of it.
On the other hand, I often wonder if the permanent diaconate diminishes the value of the priesthood in the eyes of the laity. We need priests- badly. In some places, 10 years from now will be too late. Deacons will not help those places much. We need priests. The permanent diaconate is no substitute for the priesthood, and I think it is often seen as such. Men who feel called to some sort of ministry don’t have to make a choice- they can get married and be a deacon, rather than make a sacrifice and choose between marriage and the priesthood. I think, in that sense, the permanent diaconate diminishes the concept of sacrifice.
Deacon Ed, thank you for your answer to God’s call in your life, as a Deacon, a husband and father. I am confident that your witness has and will continue to touch the lives of many. I thought of this question because my archbishop just ordained 21 men to the Diaconate on Saturday (11/17) including a man from my parish. You and your brother Deacons are in my prayers. May the Holy Spirit continue to fill your hearts with zeal and love for Lord. And may you be fearless witnesses to the Gospel. PAXAs a permanent deacon, married with 5 children and 13 grand-children, I can only say that I love my vocation and thank God for the opportunity to be of service to Him by serving his people. I have been a deacon for 16 years. While we are clergy, we live married lives as normal Catholic husbands and are called to be examples of what married families should be. I am not so naive as to say that we all succeed, as we are human just as everyone else. We say the divine office daily, (morning and evening prayers) and are called to a life of prayer. My wife and I pray daily and would encourage everyone to do so. My biggest privileges were to witness the weddings of my children and to baptize my grand-children. Whenever we see someone come back to the church because of God using us, it is profoundly humbling. I know that this vocation is not for all men, but would encourage them to consider how to best serve God in their lives. Our wives had to give permission for us to be ordained and we (deacons) vow that if we become widowers, we will not remarry. We do so, with a solemn trust that God will not give us anything that, with his grace, we cannot endure. After these 16 years, I can only look back and wonder why God has chosen one so unworthy to give such great blessings. Please pray for us.
God Bless
Deacon Ed B
I agree.For some others, the difficulties include:
As with so many other facets of present-day liturgical life, the problem lies not in the Church having done something incorrect or inappropriate (which, by definition is not possible), but rather in the misdirected application of the process.
- Selection Criteria - In too many places in too many cases, the candidates were selected (especially in the early days of the ministry’s re-establishment) based on their prominent participation in parish activities (Head Usher, President of the Men’s Club, etc.) or some other human consideration rather than on some vocation discernment process.
- Formation - In some dioceses, the training and formation of candidates appears woefully lacking. There are active deacons whose instruction in Scripture and Church History is clearly inadequate, whose formation in moral theology is questionable, and whose homiletic and public speaking skills are nowhere in evidence.
I cannot speak to other Diocese, but I do know that for mine it is not a popularity contest. By the time the group that I am part of is ordained, we will spent seven years of dicernment and formation. Although there are many called, the procecess has taken a group of over 200 to less than 50 for the years of formal formation. We went through at least three interviews including a phycological test. Our wives were also intervered. The classes are college classes given through the local Catholic University in which most of our wives take with us. The studies cover all aspects of the church, Theology, History, Liturgy, Bibical studies, Homoletics, morallity, just to a few. The process for formation is spelled out in documents concerning the Diaconate (sorry I don’t remember the name) available on the US Bishop’s web site.For some others, the difficulties include:
.
- Selection Criteria - In too many places in too many cases, the candidates were selected (especially in the early days of the ministry’s re-establishment) based on their prominent participation in parish activities (Head Usher, President of the Men’s Club, etc.) or some other human consideration rather than on some vocation discernment process.
- Formation - In some dioceses, the training and formation of candidates appears woefully lacking. There are active deacons whose instruction in Scripture and Church History is clearly inadequate, whose formation in moral theology is questionable, and whose homiletic and public speaking skills are nowhere in evidence.