Time period significance in Revelation 12:14

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kmon23
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Kmon23

Guest
What is the significance of Revelation 12:14 where it mentions the 1260 days (or year, two years, and a half-year)? What is the significance of the time period mentioned here, whether it is in the number itself or what it refers to?
 
In apocalyptic literature,1,260 days is the conventional period for the temporary triumph of evil before the end of the age (see Rev 12:14, and Dan 7:25; 12:7).
 
While there is no dogmatic interpretation regarding this, Catholic scholars tend to view the period as symbolic, representing an undefined period or persecution.

1,260 days is often expressed in other places in Scripture as a period of 42 months (or 3 1/2 years). This is the traditional expression used to describe the period of persecution endured by the Jews under Antiochus IV. It thus got transferred over into apocalyptic narrative to describe any period of persecution endured by the People of God.

The 1,260 days were interpreted literally by the Millerites who used this interpretation to miscalculate the Return of Christ in the late 1800s. The failure caused not only an event known as the Great Disappointment, but inspired what I, in my humble opinion, call the Great Denial–a handful of restorationist movements grew out of this by claiming that Christ did return on this date (or several years following in the early 1900s) but that this return is invisible to the naked eye.
 
Neofight said:
In apocalyptic literature,1,260 days is the conventional period for the temporary triumph of evil before the end of the age (see Rev 12:14, and Dan 7:25; 12:7).
Click to expand...
At the expense of causing confusion, this is in line with the view of scholars I presented. This period of trial has always resulted in triumph for God’s people as it did when the literal 42 months period ended in what is now celebrated as the rededication of the Temple or Chanukah. Thus there is a proverbial light at the end of this “persecution” tunnel.
 
I shall quietly suggest that Revelation was not written by St John the Apostle, and counsel you not to count the days until the apocalypse.
 
Adamgu_Dalibi said:
I shall quietly suggest that Revelation was not written by St John the Apostle, and counsel you not to count the days until the apocalypse.
Click to expand...
From antiquity the authorship of the book of Revelation has been in question. Catholics are not ignorant of this as can be noted by reading any introduction or footnotes found at the beginning of this book in any Church-approved Bible translation. While the book is traditionally attributed to St. John the Apostle (due to some evidence that can support this conclusion), Catholic Biblical scholarship and exegesis is not affected either way nor dependent on this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top