Time to Engage Iran?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peacemonger
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Peacemonger

Guest
As of today, there is no hard evidence that Iran has a bomb or the fissile material to build one, or the operating facilities to produce the plutonium or highly enriched uranium needed to create one. But there are reasons to believe Iran is entertaining a nuclear option.
Read the article:antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=4086
 
40.png
Peacemonger:
As of today, there is no hard evidence that Iran has a bomb or the fissile material to build one, or the operating facilities to produce the plutonium or highly enriched uranium needed to create one. But there are reasons to believe Iran is entertaining a nuclear option.
Read the article:antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=4086
Click to expand...
Think we talked about this before. Better to support the Persian revolution within Iran.

However, the US will probably unilaterally impose sanctions. You see Russia, France and Germany are actively trading with Iran and helping Iran build their reactors.
 
**US Attack On Iran inconceivable, Says UK Foreign Secretary
****http://www.spacedaily.com/images/straw-khatami-bg.jpg
**September 2001 file photo of Iranian President Mohammad Khatami greeting British Foreign Minister Jack Straw in Tehran.London (AFP) Nov 04, 2004
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said on Thursday it was “inconceivable” that the United States would attack Iran over its nuclear programme and that the world would back such action. “I don’t see any circumstances in which military action would be justified against Iran full stop,” Straw told BBC radio amid speculation that reelected US President George W. Bush may be more hawkish over the Islamic republic.

spacedaily.com/news/nuclear-doctrine-04q.html
 
40.png
Peacemonger:
As of today, there is no hard evidence that Iran has a bomb or the fissile material to build one, or the operating facilities to produce the plutonium or highly enriched uranium needed to create one. But there are reasons to believe Iran is entertaining a nuclear option.
Read the article:antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=4086
Click to expand...
If not for a nuclear bomb why else should Iran even have a nuclear program? They have more then enough oil for power and fuel. Once again the common sense is drowned out by fearfull appeasers.
 
space ghost:
Four More Wars!
Click to expand...
I seriously doubt it. Although you must realize that we are in a global war against Islamofacism. We can’t put our heads in the sand about that.
 
40.png
gilliam:
Think we talked about this before. Better to support the Persian revolution within Iran.

However, the US will probably unilaterally impose sanctions. You see Russia, France and Germany are actively trading with Iran and helping Iran build their reactors.
Click to expand...
I bet Israel deals with the Iran problem as they effectively did with Saddam’s reactor in the 80’s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top