J
Their buddies.lol who “ordained” them?
These people don’t actually want to do God’s work. They want the perceive power, they want to show contempt for authority, and they want to be able to preach their agenda from the pulpit. It’s not about actually being a humble priest.Even though it should be common sense, somebody important ought to issue a statement not to let these people perform any priestly duties, like confession, or it won’t be valid.
Probably not I would just be concerned about people who may be deceived into thinking they are valid. One should never underestimate the ignorance and/or stupidity of people.These people don’t actually want to do God’s work. They want the perceive power, they want to show contempt for authority, and they want to be able to preach their agenda from the pulpit. It’s not about actually being a humble priest.
Yes, good point. I’d love to see a follow up article that says what these people actually went and did after they were “ordained.”Probably not I would just be concerned about people who may be deceived into thinking they are valid. One should never underestimate the ignorance and/or stupidity of people.
They did have Deacons in the past, but the term used to be used in a different way. They have never had Deacons as we currently define them.Perhaps these women should have had Pope Michael ordain them so it would be valid and licit!:bowdown:
Have these female priests told Jesus He was wrong for choosing all men?:bigyikes:
Now on a serious note, isn’t there evidence and precidence for female Deacons? I could swear our Church has had female Deacons in the past. I see no problem with it as long as women are not preists and Bishops - Gods choice not mine.
Women have never in Church Tradition received the sacrament of Holy Orders. Deaconesses in the early centuries were akin to minor orders: the sub-diaconate (now defunct), acolyte or lector–except they were specially designated for Baptism of women, which was at the time done in the nude w/full submersion.Now on a serious note, isn’t there evidence and precidence for female Deacons? I could swear our Church has had female Deacons in the past. I see no problem with it as long as women are not preists and Bishops - Gods choice not mine![]()
After our local news interviewed one of these women, Archbishop Flynn made a statement. Here it is covered in his newspaper:Even though it should be common sense, somebody important ought to issue a statement not to let these people perform any priestly duties, like confession, or it won’t be valid.