M
MH84
Guest
Acts 7
55But Stephen, filled with the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at God’s right hand. **56’Look! I can see heaven thrown open,’ he said, ‘and the Son of man standing at the right hand of God.’ **57All the members of the council shouted out and stopped their ears with their hands; then they made a concerted rush at him, 58thrust him out of the city and stoned him. The witnesses put down their clothes at the feet of a young man called Saul. 59As they were stoning him, Stephen said in invocation, ‘Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.’ 60Then he knelt down and said aloud, ‘Lord, do not hold this sin against them.’ And with these words he fell asleep.
Does anyone know why Stephen was inspired to refer to Jesus as “Son of Man” instead of “Son of God” especially as he had already resurrected from the dead? Also, in Acts 3 below, Peter heals the man in the name of “Jesus Christ the Nazarene”. Why do you think that Peter didn’t say something similar to “…in the name of Jesus Christ, the only Son of God”? The titles used sound more like human names than divine names.
Acts 3
5He turned to them expectantly, hoping to get something from them, 6but Peter said, **‘I have neither silver nor gold, but I will give you what I have: in the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, walk!’ **7Then he took him by the right hand and helped him to stand up. Instantly his feet and ankles became firm, 8he jumped up, stood, and began to walk, and he went with them into the Temple, walking and jumping and praising God.
55But Stephen, filled with the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at God’s right hand. **56’Look! I can see heaven thrown open,’ he said, ‘and the Son of man standing at the right hand of God.’ **57All the members of the council shouted out and stopped their ears with their hands; then they made a concerted rush at him, 58thrust him out of the city and stoned him. The witnesses put down their clothes at the feet of a young man called Saul. 59As they were stoning him, Stephen said in invocation, ‘Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.’ 60Then he knelt down and said aloud, ‘Lord, do not hold this sin against them.’ And with these words he fell asleep.
Does anyone know why Stephen was inspired to refer to Jesus as “Son of Man” instead of “Son of God” especially as he had already resurrected from the dead? Also, in Acts 3 below, Peter heals the man in the name of “Jesus Christ the Nazarene”. Why do you think that Peter didn’t say something similar to “…in the name of Jesus Christ, the only Son of God”? The titles used sound more like human names than divine names.
Acts 3
5He turned to them expectantly, hoping to get something from them, 6but Peter said, **‘I have neither silver nor gold, but I will give you what I have: in the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, walk!’ **7Then he took him by the right hand and helped him to stand up. Instantly his feet and ankles became firm, 8he jumped up, stood, and began to walk, and he went with them into the Temple, walking and jumping and praising God.