To "Be Eucharist" to others

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nan_S
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The pope gives a clear definition of what he means by “become the Eucharist”. He means that, as the Eucharist is the Body of Christ, and we receive the Eucharist in Holy Communion, we must be(come) the Body of Christ in our self-sacrifice.
Thanks, Japhy

Burdensome1, that description you gave is numbing. Totally void, totally empty, totally effortless, totally simplistic, If THAT’S what you were taught it meant to “Be Eucharist” no wonder it troubles you. Name It and Claim It. No effort needed. So shallow that it’s meaningless. Burdensome, they couldn’t have been more wrong.

What I am coming to understand is that to “Be Eucharist” requires a whole lot more. Being fallible humans we are doomed to fall short of the perfection that is Christ Jesus, but we must put forth the effort to get as close as possible.

I found this essay by Fr. Dan Crosby, OFM Cap., which he presented at the 50th International Eucharistic Congress, in Dublin, Ireland, in June 2012. It is titled Become the Eucharist We Celebrate
I was grateful to finally be a priest, able to celebrate the Eucharist: to take the bread into my hands, say the words of Jesus, “This is my body,” and know that it truly did become his Body. Then to take the cup, say the words of Jesus over the wine, “This is my blood,” and know again that it truly did become his Blood. I did this everyday. And you know what happened? I’m embarrassed as a priest to admit this, but God knows it’s the truth. **Within only a few months after my ordination, celebrating the Eucharist became **boring. You see, all I had to do was take the bread into my hands, say the words, and it was the Body of Jesus. Take the cup, say the words, and it was the Blood of Jesus. That’s all I had to do – and while it sounds awful to admit it, it got boring.

But not only boring. **The more I celebrated the Eucharist during these months after ordination, the more *****magical ***it began to seem. Again, just take the bread and say the words – it’s the Body of Christ; just take the cup and say the words – it’s the Blood of Christ. Doesn’t that seem kind of magical?

As bad as all this sounds, there was a third thing going on which I didn’t like. In addition to the Eucharist becoming *boring and magical for me, ***I began to be haunted (or maybe taunted) by the words of a common expression: **this is no skin off my back. All I had to do was put the bread and cup into my hands, say the words, and the mystery took place: the Body and Blood of Christ were there, in my hands, for all people to see. Simply do it, say the words, and it happens. No skin off my back. 3

As I said, all this happened within three or four months after I was ordained. But thanks be to God, it bothered me immensely. I knew what I was experiencing: the Eucharist felt boring, magical, and no skin off my back. But I also knew that’s not how the Eucharist is supposed to be. How could the most precious gift Jesus gave us ever be boring, magical and no skin off our back? What was I doing wrong? I was simply celebrating Mass and understanding it the way I had been taught. How could I stay in the priesthood if this is how it was going to be?** Even worse, if I as a new priest found the Eucharist boring, magical and no skin off my back, how could it be anything but more boring, more magical and perhaps even less skin off the back of ordinary Catholics?** A deep darkness and confusion enveloped me – as well as shame. What was the matter with me? Never in all my life or all my training for the priesthood had I expected to feel like this.

continued…
 
Fr. Dan Crosby’s words continue
As I look back, it was God’s mercy entirely that this experience of pain and confusion came to me so early in my priesthood. It forced me to do much praying and much searching of Scripture, begging the Lord to send light into my darkness. Psalm 30 proclaims, “I will praise you, Lord, you have rescued me, I will praise you, Lord, for your mercy!” That psalm became my prayer, for the Lord did come to rescue me from my confusion through simply praying over, reading over the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ Last Supper. All of a sudden the light went on – I saw what I had never seen before.

This is what I mean. As I read the Gospel accounts, I tried to envision myself there with the disciples and Jesus at the Last Supper. It’s the night before Jesus died. As he reclines at table, he takes the bread, says the words and it becomes his Body. He takes the cup, says the words, and it becomes his Blood. As I prayerfully watched Jesus do this, I found myself saying (or maybe it was the Spirit of Jesus saying within me): "Remember, this was the night before Jesus died. Do you suppose when he said “This is my body which will be given for you,” that he was referring only to what he was holding in his hands? Of course not! It was the night before he died! In addition to what was in his hands, the very real flesh and blood body standing right there in front of the disciples – *this *body was going to be broken, given out of love for them the very next day.

As I continued to pray, I asked myself the same question with what Jesus did next. He took the cup in his hands and said, “This is the cup of my blood of the new covenant. It will be shed on behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins.” Again, the Spirit prompted me to ask: "Do you suppose that on the night before he died Jesus was referring only to the cup in his hands when he said, ‘This is my blood which will be poured out for you?’ Of course not! The real blood flowing at that moment through his veins and arteries: *this *blood was going to be poured out the very next day for the disciples – and for everyone!" He was not referring only to what was in his hands, nor only to his actual body and blood: it was both!

After my prayerful reflection, the “clincher” quickly came with Jesus’ final words at the Last Supper. After saying the words over the bread and cup, he told the disciples, “DO this in memory of me!” Again the Spirit confronted me: "Do you suppose when Jesus said, ‘Do this,’ that he was referring only to what he was holding in his hands? Is that all he wanted us to “do in memory of him”? Of course not! That’s doing only 50%! Jesus was saying, “Do the WHOLE thing that I’m doing! Yes, like me, take the bread and say the words. Yes, like me, take the cup and say the words. But also like me, take your own body and let it be broken out of love for others. Like me, take your blood and let it be poured out in love for others, especially for those who do not like you, who betray you and even kill you. Do the WHOLE thing in memory of me, not just 50%!” Don’t make my Body and Blood in the Eucharist simply an object of devotion; I’m giving it to you so that you BECOME what you eat. I’m giving it to you so that you can be drawn into an entirely new way of living – into my way of living: DO this in memory of me!

Finally, the light of Christ was shining brightly into my darkness. What a gift that was – and what a gift it continues to be. This experience in the first months of my priesthood marked my own conversion to the FULLNESS of the Eucharist. I can honestly say that ever since then, the Eucharist has never been boring; it has never been magical, and it IS definitely skin off my back! Incidentally, when I tell you about these three feelings I had while celebrating Eucharist early in my priesthood,** isn’t the Holy Father saying basically the same thing when he tells us that too many of our Eucharistic celebrations are “formal and empty, lacking in heartfelt participation”? I** KNOW what he’s talking about. I’ve been there, done that!

What the Lord was teaching me during those hours of prayerful reflection on the Last Supper is the same thing our Holy Father begged us to do in his Corpus Christ homily of 2009: Don’t just go to Mass, don’t just celebrate Eucharist: “Become the Eucharist!” He pleads with us: “May this be our constant desire and commitment, so that the offering of the Body and Blood of the Lord which we make on the altar may be accompanied by the sacrifice of our own existence.” If we have a conversion to the full meaning of Eucharist, how can we ever celebrate Eucharists that are “formal and empty, lacking in heartfelt participation?”
 
Yes, I have heard Capuchins before.

You should attempt to explain sacraments to a class of teenagers, or candidates in a RCIA session. Go on, try it. You will come out of the classroom swearing never to get involved in such silly tricks of language again. You work and work and work to try to help people understand reality, and in the next homily some badly-formed priest trots out the mad libs and sows confusion over all the people.

Enough, I say.

Speak clearly. Poetry is for experts. Our laity are not experts, they are very, very badly Catechized and confused.
 
earlychurchtexts.com/public/augustine_sermon_272_eucharist.htm

Is it not the “one body,” formed from many? Remember: bread doesn’t come from a single grain, but from many. When you received exorcism, you were “ground.” When you were baptized, you were “leavened.” When you received the fire of the Holy Spirit, you were “baked.” Be what you see; receive what you are.

This “be Eucharist” is not a new concept. It goes back to St. Augustine, not realy much of a modernist. And really, the analogy goes back to St. Paul in his letter to Corinth.
 
Yes, I have heard Capuchins before.

You should attempt to explain sacraments to a class of teenagers, or candidates in a RCIA session. Go on, try it. You will come out of the classroom swearing never to get involved in such silly tricks of language again. You work and work and work to try to help people understand reality, and in the next homily some badly-formed priest trots out the mad libs and sows confusion over all the people.

Enough, I say.

Speak clearly. Poetry is for experts. Our laity are not experts, they are very, very badly Catechized and confused.
You sound very bitter. Perhaps the person who misunderstands the meaning of the sacraments is not who you think it is.

A sacrament is not intended to make us merely a shining candle hidden under a bushel basket, illuminating nothing but itself until it sputters out from lack of oxygen. A sacrament fills us with grace, but it is not enough for us to merely cling to that grace like a miser. Unless that grace is put into use for the sake of our fellow man it withers and dies.

If you hold that poetry is only for experts, your comprehension of other people’s learning styles is very limited indeed, and you deprive yourself of an extremely useful tool.
 
Ah, yes, I see now. The reason why so many Catholics today have no knowledge of or faith in the real presence is a dearth of poetry.

:rolleyes: I wish this smiley was bigger, and more sarcastic.

What you fail to understand, and I suspect due to lack of direct experience in catechetics, is that BEFORE one can appreciate the mystical and secondary truth that WE are Eucharist, one must first understand and accept that JESUS is Eucharist.

We have not achieved goal #1 in a long time.
 
What you fail to understand, and I suspect due to lack of direct experience in catechetics, is that BEFORE one can appreciate the mystical and secondary truth that WE are Eucharist, one must first understand and accept that JESUS is Eucharist.

We have not achieved goal #1 in a long time.
Is there something in this entire thread which leads you to believe anyone here thinks Jesus is NOT Eucharist? So far, you are the only person here who mentions a diluted Eucharistic viewpoint which denies Jesus’ supremacy.

You also make a lot of offensive presumptions and hurl slurs about the experience of the other posters here. You are wrong, but I will not take your bait, because you have not established your own credentials.

What, pray tell, are YOUR qualifications in this area?
 
I’m arguing against diluting Eucharistic theology in popular settings, and you diagnose a lack of faith on my part.

Way to be internet to each other.

👍
 
Ah, yes, I see now. The reason why so many Catholics today have no knowledge of or faith in the real presence is a dearth of poetry.

:rolleyes: I wish this smiley was bigger, and more sarcastic.
Do you also judge St. Augustine so harshly? You have absolutely zero knowledge of the experiences or knowledge of others here. This place does not welcome posters who make unchartiable and negative judgements of other posters.
 
I’m arguing against diluting Eucharistic theology in popular settings, and you diagnose a lack of faith on my part.
The connection of the Eucharist to service is not a dilution of theology. It is part of the theology. Failure to recognize this makes the Eucharist less central to our faith, not more, as is the actual dilution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top