To chew or not to chew?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LatinByzCath
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The hosts used at my parish are too thick and heavy to be dissolved, so there isn’t a choice.
Same here , I’d never get it swallowed to receive the precious blood or even before the end of Mass. I think it’s a little superstitious to believe chewing it is irreverent. Almost positive the disciples chewed the last supper.
 
I think it’s a little superstitious to believe chewing it is irreverent.
Could be, but then some consider chewing on a toothpick or gum or even nothing as rude. At least I’ve been reprimanded on it.
Almost positive the disciples chewed the last supper.
Even before Vatican II, the priest chewed the large consecrated Host. But that misses the point about the strategic design of the smaller thinner wafer.
 
The Lord Himself said that His Flesh is REAL food, not some kind of “spiritual” food that transcends human eating processes.
Hmmm. See post #24 for the Knox take on the Greek.
 
Could be, but then some consider chewing on a toothpick or gum or even nothing as rude. At least I’ve been reprimanded on it.

that’s hardly the same thing. 😉

Even before Vatican II, the priest chewed the large consecrated Host. But that misses the point about the strategic design of the smaller thinner wafer.
Right. The “strategic design” came about because people were obsessing over it.
Apparently they still are. It was a time when everything the laity did was suspect.
People had to separated from the sacred space, etc. The advent of the small host was just one of many things that came about due to mistrust of the people.
 
The advent of the small host was just one of many things that came about due to mistrust of the people.
Could have been a matter of economics as well.

How large does it have to be in order to be valid? AFAIK, the smallest particle will suffice.
 
I doubt economics had ANYTHING to do with it.
Sure it does. I used to take graduate courses in business with priests at a Benedictine University so I know a little about it.
The dying often take a very small piece for the viaticum.
Actually my dad couldn’t even take the smallest piece on his deathbed. So it had to be spiritual.
 
Sure it does. I used to take graduate courses in business with priests at a Benedictine University so I know a little about it.

Ok, dig in your notes and let me know where the 6-11th century the church needed to find a way to save money in the sacristy.

Actually my dad couldn’t even take the smallest piece on his deathbed. So it had to be spiritual.
May his soul, and souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace.
 
This whole topic can border of scrupulosity if thought of too much. Receiving communion is the important thing.
 
Is there any official church document on this?
Or has anybody spoken to a priest or apologist about this?
 
Thanks for posting this, Kathrin. Does this help set your mind at ease? How about the rest of you? I hope so.
It’s consumed either way. Why hurry the process when you have a chance to reflect upon it before it loses its “appearance” per your earlier post where you wrote

“The Church teaches that once the accident no longer have the appearance of Bread and Wine, they are no longer the Body and Blood of Christ.”

???

According to your statement, if you consume before you return to your pew and have a real chance of reflection, you no longer have the Body and Blood of Christ.
 
Wow, and I thought video game fans were nitpicky and argued over the silliest things.

I chew. I was never taught any particular way to consume the wafer. Ever. Really, the fact that this is a four-page thread is mind-boggling.
 
Potentially spitting a piece of the Eucharist onto the ground is not a silly thing.
Does not have to do with chewing whatsoever. I’m amazed there’s been a 4 page argument on not chewing when that is not a Church requirement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top