L
Leopard
Guest
Correct, which is why I qualified my statement by saying that an individual’s personal culpability for sinfulness in any action depends on his ability to freely choose that action.Well, I admit I am Scrupulous and I go to Confession frequently (usually a minimum of once a week…more often if I can get the Priests that won’t give me a lecture on going to Confession too much). As a youth, I was a frequent hand-washer and stuff and as a Protestant, I prayed frequently for forgiveness (basically doing an examination of conscience or whatever you want to call it).
Remember, Scrupulosity (OCD) is not a condition that one can ‘bring on’ like drunkenness (a person chooses to guzzle booze, one does not choose a Scrupulous condition)…
Scrupulosity itself is not sinful. Knowingly and freely refusing to take reasonable care of one’s health, including mental health issues, may be sinful. Some scrupulous persons may through no fault of their own be unable to evaluate or control their moral behaviors. These persons would not be morally culpable for their moral decisions to the extent that they are unable to freely act regarding these.…nor is it a sinful condition (remember, getting drunk is itself sinful, being Scrupulous) and I really is not an occasion of sin…
Other persons may be less severely affected by scrupulosity, may be aware of their condition, may be aware of what they should do to alleviate their condition, may be capable of undertaking these therapeutic actions, but still freely choose not to do this but instead to nurture their scrupulous condition. This may be comparable to a person who, before he tales a first drink, knows he has a drinking problem, knows that if he takes that first drink he may place himself in a condition where he can not control his moral decisions and/or his actions, is as yet capable of sufficient self control not to take that first drink, but still freely chooses to do so. Such persons who freely choose to place themselves in a new condition or to cultivate an existing condition in which they can not make or control moral decisions or actions, and not follow good medical or pastoral advice regarding lessening this condition, may be morally culpable for the initial decision to place themselves into or aggravate the condition, to the extent that they are freely able to make that initial decision at the time that decision is made.
Obviously for some persons, this culpability is zero. Others may bear some personal responsibility. Self-diagnosis is difficult in any matter where one’s own judgment is impaired, so the scrupulous person is well advised to follow the advice of a good confessor and physician, psychologist and/or other qualified therapist familiar with his case.
Not as such, although any action inadvisably undertaken freely and knowingly that results in damage to one’s own health may be sin against one’s duty to care for one’s health.…After all, while going to Confession too much (unless it gets to wear it is taking up so much time…such as going hourly or something) may mess up someone’s psyche further (i.e. make them more Scrupulous possibly in their actions), it really does not lead to sin…
This is correct. Such factors can reduce or eliminate personal culpability.…Now, what causes me trouble is that besides the Scrupulosity, I deal with a masturbation issue. Obviously, I know what the Church teaches on the issue (it, along with the accompanying lust, is a mortal sin, but that there can be things that lesson the consent such as habit [addiction] and other issues)…
(continued)
