T
twopekinguys
Guest
How can I put this delicately, and politely?Better to read the book on line for free. fairlds.org/authors/bickmore-barry/restoring-the-ancient-church-joseph-smith-and-early-christianity
Here’s the author starting to discuss apostasy
What exactly was this “apostasy,” and when was it supposed to happen? According to LDS scholar Kent Jackson, the word apostasy is derived from the Greek word “apostasia,” which means “‘rebellion,’ ‘mutiny,’ ‘revolt,’ or ‘revolution,’ and is used in ancient contexts with reference to uprisings against established authority.”4 Thus, the apostasy was to be a rebellion against God’s established authority on earth.
Latter-day Saints believe that the apostasy was underway even while the Apostles were alive, and that it inevitably completed its course after the last Apostles were gone. While the New Testament does not give many specifics about the timetable of the rebellion in its predictions, it contains a number of clues pointing to the fact that a massive rebellion was taking place in the Church, and that there was not much time left.
Now that’s funnier than “threadjacking ways”
A book reviewer on amazon.com says
Finally, the book’s chapter on the alleged “apostasy” fails to take into account the traditional Catholic teaching on the nature of the Church’s indefectibility and infallibility. The author leaves a footnote to discuss the “gates of hell” passage in Matthew 16:18 but this, if I understand correctly is a reference to the indefectibility of Peter’s faith (an by extension, the Catholic Church’s). . In contrast, the idea of the indefectibility of the Church as a whole is based primarily on the belief that the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ, in spiritual union with Him, and that the Holy Spirit is the Soul of the Church. From this leads the notion of ecclesial indefectibility (this is how I understand the Catholic view. It is not simply that Peter was given a promise in Matthew 16:18).** This view of the Catholic Church’s indefectibility, however, is nowhere treated in Bickmore’s discussion of the alleged “apostasy”, a fact which further weakens his already hopelessly unsubstantiated case.**
What’s also telling is the author is a science professor not a theologian. That would at least help explain a lack of Catholic teaching and theology in his book. IMHO he needs to focus on his science teaching as his own students don’t grade him very highly.
ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=173550
All in all, this book appears to be a very good source for Catholic apologetics.![]()
hmmmmmm
Can I get an AMEN up in here!?!?!