they [Catholic Culture] equate fidelity with whatever is currently popular rather than timeless tradition.
Shin, could you give me some examples with links to support what you claim?
Well, I’m not in the mood to sift through them and make citations, or start a CC knocking thread – it isn’t all bad, far from it and can be very useful – I will simply expand a little more, you can take it or leave as you choose.
I’ll will say that they can equate criticism of the novus ordo with infidelity in their site reviews, which is not the case – but they do not equate many of the practices of the world with infidelity, immodesty, immoral banner ads, these are often passed over. They love Christopher West for example. Christopher West green vs. OLRL red? Ha!
They’ll knock a site for just using pre-Vatican II resources and not anything later. What is wrong with that? Was the Church up till then somehow off?
If you know what tradition is, and you know what one might call ‘pop Catholicism’ a sort of popular with the world integration of it that gets put out a lot lately, you just well – have to take one look at Catholic Culture, and you can tell they’re not traditional Catholicism, which is the real fully authentic Faith. If you know what traditional Catholicism is, you can pretty much see where it is at a glance or where it isn’t. If you don’t… well, you learn that by experience.
Traditional Catholicism takes chastity more seriously, modesty in dress more seriously, liturgy more seriously, and doesn’t believe tradition is some sort of blank slate that can be rewritten just because it’s not carved in dogmatic stone.
That’s not to say that CC isn’t quite useful in that they give the reasons for their ratings, which allows you to sift through them and ignore the bad bits, and the other good resources… But their brand of Catholicism is clearly a good bit something new, not something timeless… which in the end does not exist.
So I pray for them that they will make more progress, because I have had a lot of good of them.
