M
markhiggins01
Guest
Hello,
I am a seminarian looking to spend some of my books grant on some decent books that question some of the assumptions made by the modernist scholars.
So books that re-affirm that St. Matthew’s Gospel was written first, that source Q is a load of nonsense, that scripture is inerrant, that the historical books of the OT are historical, that the prophetic books are prophetic.
Don’t post a reply if you disagree with this or if you contest the label of being a modernist.
What books are there out there and both pre and post conciliar sources.
So far I have found- Fr W Most’s Biblical inerrancy, and Kelly’s New biblical theorists. What else do we have out there?
I am a seminarian looking to spend some of my books grant on some decent books that question some of the assumptions made by the modernist scholars.
So books that re-affirm that St. Matthew’s Gospel was written first, that source Q is a load of nonsense, that scripture is inerrant, that the historical books of the OT are historical, that the prophetic books are prophetic.
Don’t post a reply if you disagree with this or if you contest the label of being a modernist.
What books are there out there and both pre and post conciliar sources.
So far I have found- Fr W Most’s Biblical inerrancy, and Kelly’s New biblical theorists. What else do we have out there?