Traditional Practices

  • Thread starter Thread starter anruari
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes that was a typo- sorry
the sign reads - “No communion in the Hand!”

the first time I went to receive communion there I had not noticed the sign. I put my hands out, & was rather surprised when the priest pressed the Eucharist between my barely open lips!
 
Yes that was a typo- sorry
the sign reads - “No communion in the Hand!”

the first time I went to receive communion there I had not noticed the sign. I put my hands out, & was rather surprised when the priest pressed the Eucharist between my barely open lips!
good for your priest. thats great.
 
But CITH is allowed in the UK. So unless it was an EF Mass, I don’t think the priest should do that. It should be up to the communicant.
but it is still an indult, AND redemptonis sacramentum says if theres a risk of profanation, it should not be done. i trust that the priest has weighed the cirumstances, and has determined that there is a sufficient risk of profanitation to not allow cith
 
Why is it that we cant have - at least on a deanery level - at least one mass where the GIRM reccomendations are followed properly -
I suspect that if this were done more often fewer people would feel that they have to go all the way back to the Pre-Vatican 2 rites to experience this level of reverence in the Mass.

Am I just looking to have my cake and eat it?
Not necessarily. I would still prefer the EF even if the OF was always celebrated according to the rules. A number of people from my parish feel the same (if not all of them). The reason: because ‘traditionalists’ believe liturgy should not have been changed in the first place and that there is good reason for continuity and tradition in the way we worship.
 
Here are a couple of very interesting posts from ArchBishop Dolan’s blog that talk about this topic. I found them very insightful.

blog.archny.org/?p=1567

blog.archny.org/?p=1691

I was just lamenting to my spiritual director that I do feel that sometimes we have lost a sense of the sacred and of wonder & awe that can be inspired by sacramentals and traditional practices.

In talking to some older friends, to whom many of the things the ArchBishops discusses seem like a giant step backward, they seem to look at these things as silly & superstitious and not what a “mature faith” needs.

I disagree, I feel that there is a place for these things, and that what our job is is to help people to understand their value and want to embrace them, instead of demanding that they do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top