J
JReducation
Guest
We have to be careful. Teresa was a personality all her own. It is true that she learned a great deal from her Franciscan mentors, but she does not deviate from the original Carmelite hermits. What she learned from the Franciscans, especially Francisco of Osuna and Pedro of Alcantara was the power of prayer. However, her theology is her own.I didn’t know the publisher still had hardbound versions, as I’ve only seen the softbound one. My copy is a good 25 years old, and was bought directly from the publisher when they had their annual summer inventory reduction sale and warehouse sale of imperfect books (they had minor problems that they couldn’t sell normally as new, most are cosmetic blemishes that are hardly noticeable). I ended up buying a number of books from the series that way. They had many books at 50% off. Those were the days…
Teresa was indebted to Franciscans, and certainly influenced by them and their spirituality; Peter of Alcantara, the Third Spiritual Alphabet, and the Poor Clares who advised and supported her in her reform of Carmel. Reading Teresa, one can see her Carmelite spirituality imbued with the Franciscan one. Francis has probably influenced more spirituality’s and religions than any other saint. She’s definitely one of my favorites to read, and I wouldn’t have known about Osuna if she hadn’t spoken so favorably about this wonderful book.
I have always said that she drank from the same well as the Franciscans, but the outcome was very different. If we look at a Discalced Carmelite monastery and a Poor Clare monastery there are remarkable differences.
Clare leans more on Francis, while Teresa leans more on Albert. Clare’s focus is on poverty and Teresa’s focus is on contemplation. Teresa uses detachment as a means to contemplation. Clare uses contemplation as a means to detachment.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF